Months ago, I laid the framework for next year’s primary election with my blog entitled “The Neapolitan Party“. In it, my theory was that Republican voters would fall on three lines, Social Conservative, Fiscal Conservative, and Libertarian. Cain’s rise and Perry’s fall is continued proof that this template is accurate. It also is bad news for Mitt Romney.
An untrained eye might see Perry’s recent fall in the polls and Romney reclaiming front runner status as great news for the Romney campaign. But the numbers tell a different story. Romney is not losing or gaining votes from Social Conservatives. Perry and Cain are moving these votes back and forth. Eventually the race will come down to Romney and the top Social Conservative. At this point, that top Social Conservative will likely win.
Romney will get Huntsman’s voters when Huntsman drops out of the race. Paul and Johnson voters will either go to Romney, stay home, or vote third party. But the rest of the candidates are passing support back and forth between them based on who has the best chance of beating Obama. This is why Santorum and Gingrich continue to fail to gain traction. When they drop out, their votes will go to the top Social Conservative.
Romney’s best hope may be for Perry to regain his momentum. With the attacks leveled by Bachmann and Santorum against Rick Perry, some of their jaded supporters may gravitate to Romney if and when they fall out of the race. Others will see Perry’s illegal immigration stances and choose Romney as the lesser of two evils. However, I believe that Romney may not be able to recoup enough supporters from other Social Conservatives unless he seriously steps up his Social Conservative message. Romney has done well to endorse TEA party objectives and move more to the right socially, but trust is still an issue. On the other hand, Cain is a very likeable and trustable candidate. Libertarians are wary of him because he used to be a board member of a Federal Reserve bank. But the libertarians who would not vote for Cain because of that have far more reasons to not vote for any other viable candidate.
The other factor that could change this would be last minute polling of who would beat Obama. If it comes down to Cain and Romney, but polls show that Romney would have a better chance of beating Obama, that could be a game changer.
Filed under: About the Candidates, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Polls, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, State & National Polls, Strategy, TEA Party | Tagged: bachmann, Barack Obama, cain, conservative, federal reserve, fiscal, florida, Gingrich, GOP, gop 2012, Herman Cain, illegal, illegal alien, instate tuition, Iowa, johnson, libertarian, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, New Hampshire, newt, Newt Gingrich, obama, paul, perry, poll, polls, President Obama, Primary, primary 2012, Rick Perry, Romney, Ron Paul, santorum, social, tea, Tea Party, tuition, vote, votes |