Six months ago, I wrote an article about Newt Gingrich’s attempt to clarify his views on healthcare. Newt had gotten himself in trouble when it came out that in 1993 Newt agreed with the Heritage Foundation on an insurance mandate. At the time, Newt said that he felt there should be a law that made it so that people would need to either buy health insurance, or post a bond when they receive medical care as a guarantee that they will in fact pay for that care.
At the time, I warned Newt that this would cause problems. Of course, we didn’t have as large a readership back then, so I’m sure he didn’t get my warning. Shortly before that, Newt was secretly my number one pick to eventually win it all.
Sure enough, right about that time Newt called in to Rush Limbaugh’s show and tried to explain exactly what I said in the first paragraph here. Rush didn’t buy it, and the godfather of Social Conservatism cast doubt on his blessing of Newt’s candidacy. Listen to the interview here. The result was that a couple weeks later I was writing about the rubble of Newt 2012. In that article, I said that it would take a miracle to revive Newt, that miracle being upward movement in the polls. Hallelujah, we now know the political gods did not forsake us after 2008.
Today, Rush once again expressed his reservations about Newt. In what he framed as analysis of Newt’s rise to the top, Rush once again mentioned Newt’s baggage including his support of a mandate in 1993. While doing his best not to appear against Newt, Rush laid out everything Conservatives should be careful about with Newt. To be fair though, he did the same for Mitt Romney at the same time.
In the end, Rush chalked up Newt’s rise to the top as two things. Newt doesn’t defend his mistakes (like Romney does with Romneycare), and he does go after the media for their bias.
It’s a little bit more than that. Newt has a proven fiscal conservative track record. He balanced the budget for four years in a row. The Federal budget, not just one of the 50 states. That doesn’t even seem in the realm of reality these days. It would be like saying he walked on water in the context of today’s deficit. But speaking of walking on water, Newt has the social conservative credentials as well.
In a speech in Jacksonville, Florida yesterday (that yours truly had the privilege of attending), Newt said that under his education reforms, teachers who could not adequately explain what it meant to be endowed by your Creator with certain inalienable rights would be asked to resign. This was in response to a question from the audience regarding a neighboring county where the government was putting pressure on a pastor there to stop school flagpole prayer meetings. Newt said that he would seek to end funding for Planned Parenthood and use that money to help promote adoption. He is pro-school choice. He has well rounded conservative credentials and unlike Romney, conservatives trust Newt when he says things like supporting a mandate and sharing a couch with Pelosi were stupid.
Frank Luntz on Sean Hannity’s show this afternoon said that everyone was shocked about Newt’s resurgence. It wasn’t a surprise for me. I predicted that as the Cain-Gingrich debate received acknowledgment and replay, Newt would rise. On November 3rd, I said that people were taking a fresh look at Newt Gingrich. But even better than that, on October 13th, I laid out the path to victory for Newt Gingrich going through South Carolina and Florida. In a blog titled “Yes He Can”, I analyzed how Cain was preparing to fall on his 9-9-9 plan and how Newt would take early states Iowa and South Carolina, leading to a showdown in Florida between Newt/Mitt. So no, it wasn’t a shock. If you’ve been reading this blog, it wasn’t a shock to you either.
In that same article, I said that Newt’s dirty laundry has been airing out for a long time. It doesn’t smell as “fresh” as Cain’s or Perry’s. The same is true for Mitt, although Newt knows when to admit to a mistake. Therefore, in this up and down race where nothing is certain and things change every minute, I am sticking to what I said over a month ago. Newt/Mitt, for the championship, the second to last GOP debate in Florida in Jacksonville. Newt will be carrying South Carolina and maybe Iowa to the table, Mitt will have New Hampshire under his belt. Then the two smartest, most articulate, and strongest leaders will have one last significant chance to make their case.
Rush, Coulter, and any other big-time rightwing players who still think Bachmann, Cain, or Santorum could come back and win, keep dreaming. It’s more likely that Tebow would win the Superbowl.
PS, I have absolutely nothing against Tebow. In fact, after Thursday’s game against Rex Ryan and the Jets, Tebow is my second favorite quarterback.
Filed under: Florida, Herman Cain, Iowa, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, New Hampshire, Newt Gingrich, Paul Ryan, Polls, President Obama, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, State & National Polls, Strategy, TEA Party | Tagged: abortion, adoption, ann coulter, at the flagpole, bachmann, balanced budget, Barack Obama, bias in the media, broncos, cain, can newt win south carolina, clinton, CNBC, coulter, deficit, dittohead, eib, eib network, fctp.org, first coast tea party, florida, florida debate, florida tea party, fox, foxnews, frank luntz, friday, global warming, god, god in school, hannity, healthcare bond, Herman Cain, ike friday, Iowa, jacksonville, jacksonville debate, jacksonville florida, jacksonville townhall, jets, jets versus broncos, luntz, mandate, media, Media bias, Michele Bachmann, mitt, Mitt Romney, msnbc, New Hampshire, newt, newt balanced the budget, Newt Gingrich, newt in the polls, newt versus mitt in florida, newt's rise, obama, pelosi, pelosi couch, perry, planned parenthood, polls, rex ryan, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, rush, rush limbaugh, rush on newt, rush talking about newt, santorum, school choice, sean hannity, South Carolina, superbowl, tea, Tea Party, tebow, tebow touchdown, the eib network, the rush limbaugh show, townhall, yes he can |