Michele Bachmann believes she is the best candidate for the job. She should, she’s running. However, unlike the two front runners, Bachmann has chosen not to differentiate herself based on ideas, but instead to attack the front runners as being more liberal as she is. Her most recent target is Newt Gingrich, but she can also be traced to the fall of Rick Perry.
The two front runners, and Herman Cain, have done a very good job of not attacking other candidates. The “attacks” between Romney and Gingrich over the last week have amounted to points scored on differentiation in back ground and complementary assessments of each others abilities with subtle hints as to who is better because of it.
So why does Bachmann think that attacking the other GOP candidates is a winning proposition? Simply put, she does not believe Barack Obama can win. In Bachmann’s mind, the GOP candidate could be Tom DeLay and Obama would still lose. Technically, she should be right.
The administration got the best news it’s had in three years this past week. Enough people dropped out of the job hunt to join Occupy Wall Street that unemployment (which only measures who is looking for a job) fell to 8.6%. Now, Obama’s justice department has released a new round of incriminating documents on a Friday night to avoid the media cycle and Obama is skipping town for an extended Christmas/New Years vacation that us working schlubs could only dream of.
But Bachmann’s faith in Republicans’ will to vote for the lesser of two evils is unfounded. Just look at how quickly Republican supporters are backing off of Cain after the most recent affair allegation. Sure some of it is fears over electability, some of it is dislike for his 999 plan and foreign policy, but a good portion of it is different standards. It’s the kinds of standards that make Republicans resign for tapping their toes in the men’s room while Democrats can shove a cigar in their young intern’s….well anyway.
Bachmann’s gamble is that since Obama is going to lose anyway, Republicans need to take this glorious opportunity to choose the best candidate for the job (Michele Bachmann) and not settle for a RINO (Mitt Romney), a crony capitalist (Rick Perry), or a flip flopping environmentalist (Newt Gingrich). Instead, we should choose the TEA Party image of perfect conservatism, the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan mixed with Sarah Palin: Michele Bachmann.
Bachmann seems to think her negativity will make her be the first candidate to be a front runner, lose it all and end up in 5%ville, and then rise from the ashes a second time. She needs to be careful that it won’t accomplish that for Obama instead.
Filed under: Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Strategy Tagged: | 8.6%, 999, accusations, affair, allegations, bachmann, Barack Obama, cain, christmas vacation, cigar, clinton, democrats, foreign policy, Gingrich, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, newt, Newt Gingrich, obama, occupy wall street, ows, republicans, Romney, sex, sexual harassment, unemployment, vacation