I would think Michele Bachmann would be more gentle with some of her Republican competitors. She herself has faced everything from the bigotry of the Left against conservative women to the watchfulness of the one-eyed media who has gleefully remarked on her every gaffe while turning the blind eye to the Obama/Biden circus.
Yet, to hear from Bachmann at the Foxnews debate, you would think Newt Gingrich was a pro-choice, pro-partial birth abortion candidate who used to run Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, and will be a President to the left of Obama himself. This is no exaggeration. However, her characterizations were.
Now, Newt and Bachmann come from different perspectives on the Republican party. Bachmann would have done well to note that clearly. Newt is not going to close off the Republican party and say ‘no pro-choicers, homosexuals, immigration reformers, anti-war candidates allowed’. Bachmann, as a TEA Party activist, seems to lean more towards that hardline stance. There is definitely a point to be made there. There are many Republicans who desire party purity to the point of ditching the big top and settling for a camping tent. Newt is not one of those. Such a point is sufficient to distinguish Bachmann from Newt.
Newt Gingrich is not pro-choice. He is not pro-partial birth abortion. His firm took an average of $225,000 a year from Freddie Mac in consulting fees over an 8 year period. That is not a whole lot for high end consulting by a multi-member firm in Washington DC for a multi-billion dollar company. Think about it. Freddie Mac represented about 3% of the Gingrich Group’s total revenues. It was an exclusive group with about 300 clients. Clients paid on average $200,000 a year for membership. Newt himself did not do any lobbying for Freddie Mac.
But that isn’t what she said. Bachmann’s characterization was so outlandish that she lost all credibility. What could have been an intellectual differentiation turned into a wild and false assault on one of the two best hopes of defeating Obama in 2012.
Bachmann will not win her way back into the hearts and minds of the Republican majority with this sort of outlandish hyperbole. She certainly won’t win with a kill ’em all attitude towards Republicans who don’t fit her cookie cutter. For this reason, I will make the same call on Bachmann that I have for Huntsman and Johnson:
Michele, you are not going to win. You have done too much already on your own to destroy your own campaign. As far as destroying other candidates campaigns, your attacks are effective only on the ignorant. Now you are no longer contributing value to this primary. You are not contributing fresh ideas, you are not drawing new blood into the campaign. It is time to end your campaign. Whether or not you realize it, it’s already over.
Filed under: Debates, Gary Johnson, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, President Obama, Rick Perry, Strategy, TEA Party | Tagged: abortion, antiwar, bachmann, big tent, debate, fannie mae, fox, foxnews, freddie mac, Gingrich, late term, Michele Bachmann, newt, Newt Gingrich, obama, partial birth abortion, paul, primary 2012, pro-choice, pro-life, reagan, Ron Paul, tea, Tea Party, wh 2012, Whitehouse, whitehouse 2012 |