Romney won, Bachmann quit, Santorum is rising, Paul is maintaining his status quo, Newt is struggling, Perry has faith, and Huntsman….who? Iowa recapped:
Mitt Romney won in Iowa. Honestly? No big deal. Romney will gain momentum from winning, but when people look at the numbers they will realize that if Michele Bachmann wasn’t in the race, Santorum would have won comfortably. If Santorum wasn’t in the race, Newt and Perry probably would have both outpolled Romney. In Iowa, he got his fiscal conservatives and the social conservatives split the rest. But it’s not all bad for Romney. In fact, while Romney may have come to a predictable finish, he won by choosing his opponent. Gingrich was a shoe in to win Iowa barely more than a week ago. Instead, Santorum now has the social conservative momentum and Romney should easily win New Hampshire and could win South Carolina. So Romney’s win is:
Good for: Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum Bad for: Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Jon Huntsman
A shocking surprise to some, a mild surprise for others, Santorum has Huckabee’d Iowa. With a great ground game, time, hard work, and the luck of Newt Gingrich being destroyed by Romney, Inc, Michele Bachmann, and the Republican establishment, Santorum is finally getting his shot at vetting. Already, he is being called a war monger and “big government conservative”. But Santorum’s rise may be too late in the game for a vetting process to destroy him. Many social conservatives have been waiting for a reason to believe that Santorum could win. From the day he started running the narrative has been that Santorum is simply unelectable on a national scale. So, Santorum’s second place finish is:
Good for: Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney Bad for: Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann
Paul’s third place finish is certainly not what the Paul camp was hoping for. Ron Paul came very close to breaking free from his libertarian ceiling, but in the end social conservatives showed they would rather take a gamble on the unvetted Rick Santorum instead of giving Ron Paul the ‘turn’ he was starting to experience. Paul has been passed over as the anti-Romney. He may be able to turn things around in New Hampshire, but a third or worse finish in New Hampshire should be a clear signal to Paul that the revolution is over. Paul’s third place finish is:
Good for: Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney Bad for: Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich
Even if Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann dropped out of the race and split their votes on a pro rata share, Newt would still not have passed Mitt Romney. The fact is, Romney ran an incredible, strategic dismantling of Newt without even breaking a sweat. In the meantime, Newt refused to go dishonestly negative, but managed plenty of headlines saying “Newt Goes on the Attack”. Newt is realizing in time for New Hampshire, he won’t win with a positive campaign. Can he win with a negative one? New Hampshire will probably go Romney’s way. But Newt needs South Carolina. Without South Carolina, he won’t have the momentum to take Florida and Florida is the key. So Newt’s dismal fourth place finish is:
Good for: Mitt Romney Bad for: Newt Gingrich, Michele Bachmann
Perry’s fifth place win got him to re-think his campaign. But with Michele Bachmann choosing to drop out, perhaps Perry thinks he still has hope. He should have decided to stay in Texas. Perry’s placing is:
Bad for: Rick Perry
Bachmann barely registered. Iowa was her last hope to connect with social and evangelical conservatives and she failed. Fortunately, this provided the wake up call she needed to see the end of the race. Bachmann has decided to drop out of the race and return to Minnesota. Unfortunately for Bachmann, she has not built the cult following that Sarah Palin did. Hopefully she will continue to be a strong voice for the TEA party.
Good for: Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry Bad for: Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney
As for the other contender, Jon Huntsman’s disrespectful snub of Iowa, especially in light of Romney’s stronger finish in the state and momentum, seals Huntsman’s irrelevancy.
Filed under: Florida, Iowa, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, Mitt Romney, New Hampshire, Newt Gingrich, Polls, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin, TEA Party | Tagged: bachmann, Barack Obama, florida, GOP, gop 2012, huntsman, Iowa, Jon Huntsman, Michele Bachmann, mitt, Mitt Romney, New Hampshire, newt, Newt Gingrich, obama, Palin, paul, Primary, primary winner, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, santorum, South Carolina, vetting, vetting process, wh 2012, whitehouse2012 |