Ron Paul never had a chance. It was part him and his abrasiveness, part his foreign policy that he failed to connect with voters on. For me, it was also his pro-choice in the states stance on innocent human life. But one of the reasons Paul never connected with mainstream Republican voters who would normally be drawn to his small government message was his annoying, in your face, loud, obnoxious, and sometimes downright mean supporters.
In fact, much of Paul’s candidacy has seemed like a mean spirited romp that he frankly has had little control over. A perfect example is the racist, black helicopter newsletter that he either edited, or in some cases signed, but claims to have never read.
One thing is clear, the friends of Ron Paul have not helped Ron Paul in this election.
Take note, Mitt Romney, your friends are getting out of hand too. Romney is a great candidate. He is a Reaganite, and I believed even in 2008 in his conversion to pro-life, pro-family issues. He is cool headed on foreign policy, and great on fiscal conservatism. I believe him when he talks about states rights and the tenth amendment separating what he did in Massachusetts from what he would do in the Whitehouse. I’ve said before that I think it is criminal what his opponent did in 2008, insinuating that he was going to cut and run from Iraq. I will admit that I had hoped Newt would run in 2008, but when he didn’t, I supported Mitt Romney.
Now Mitt needs to be careful. His friends are getting a little crazy. I have been chronicling Ann Coulter’s conversion from right wing radical conservatism to mainstream moderate in her love affair support for Mitt Romney, and it appears the conversion is complete. In her latest newsletter, she blasts Rick Santorum as a “right wing zealot” and calls him a Catholic, not a conservative.
Coulter also lists why only Romney is electable. Ready? Pay attention kids. If you were merely a congressman or congresswoman, you can’t win. If you have a Texas accent, you can’t win. If you ever had a business with prominent clients who did bad things later on in life, you can’t win. If you are a Catholic, you can’t win. If you have ever cheated on a spouse, you can’t win. If you’ve been divorced, you can’t win.
Apparently, if you are a Mormon, you can win, but not if you are a Catholic. If you started your career as a pro-choice candidate, you can win, but not if you ever had dinner with a pro-choicer. If you instituted and still defend a personal insurance mandate you are electable, but if you at any time thought one would be a good idea, you are unelectable. If you believe in Global Warming, you are OK by Ann. If you do an ad with a Democrat saying you believe in generic climate change, forget it.
As John McCain taught us yesterday, campaign rhetoric is campaign rhetoric. If Newt or Santorum wins, Coulter will have a lot of backstepping and bridge rebuilding to do. Judging from what she says now, we might be tempted to think she would vote for Obama over Newt or Santorum. Time for a reality check. Coulter is in full campaign mode for Mitt Romney. Give it a few months and we will get back the fiery, anti-liberal conservative Ann Coulter we used to know and love. The question is if she will get us back.
Filed under: Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, Strategy | Tagged: abrassive, ann coulter, climate change, conservative, coulter, coulter attacks catholicism, freddie mac, global warming, leftwing, mitt, Mitt Romney, moderate, Mormon, newt, Newt Gingrich, obama, paul, radical, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, santorum, supporters, Texas |