There are plenty of pundits explaining why Romney is the best candidate to go up against President Obama in November. The effort to find the candidate who has ‘the best chance of beating Obama’ has been the topic of countless editorials and discussion groups. Certainly defeating Obama is a critical goal, but victory in November will have more to do with the weakness of Obama due to his failed policies than anything the GOP puts on the table. When an incumbent is running for re-election it is almost always more of a referendum on that person than about the ideas of the challenger. That being the case, maybe the focus on who has ‘the best change of beating Obama’ is the wrong metric to be using in deciding our nominee.
I submit that the question we should be asking is, “Which candidate has the best chance of undoing Obama’s policies?” When looking at the election that way, Romney comes up short. That’s the real problem with Romney. We could look past his lack of a personality and stammering during almost every debate. We could even look past his flip-flops. But when we look past those things, what do we find? We find a manager. That’s not what the country needs.
Barack Obama has governed as one of the most radical and autocratic Presidents in our history. He has accomplished so much of his radical agenda in the past three years that it truly will take a radical and energetic effort in the opposite direction just to get the country back on an even keel, let alone making real progress. Romney isn’t a radical. He isn’t going to drive us back from Obamanism. He’s more likely to take ‘reasonable’ steps to slowly and thoughtfully back us away from the cliff only to have the next liberal who gets into the White House send us careening back over it.
The only way to undo a radical is either a long steady restoration or a radical restoration. Since Presidential terms are only 4 years long and there is no guarantee of a re-election victory, the slow and steady approach isn’t wise. We can’t afford to suffer under Obama’s policies for more than a year after he leaves office. We need a radical reversal of our nation’s course. We need what happened in Wisconsin and New Jersey where radical leftist nonsense was radically and swiftly thrown into the dumpster so real economic progress could be made.
Romney’s a nice guy and if the past four years had been Reagan’s second term, then Romney would be a great choice. All he’d have to do is be a manager and keep things running smoothly. But, the past four years weren’t Reagan’s second term; they were Obama’s radical experiment in disaster. We’re not running smoothly. We need more than a manager. We need a crusader who will drive to undo what Obama did with even more gusto than Obama used to do it himself.
We need to stop asking who could best defeat Obama and accept the fact that Obama will win or lose on his record. Assuming we do win the election because Obama is such a failure, which candidate will most effectively and quickly undo not just some of what Obama did, but ALL of what Obama did? The answer clearly isn’t Mitt Romney.
Filed under: Mitt Romney | Tagged: 2012 election sites, 2012 election strategy, 2012 Presidential Election, 2012 race for president, 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries, 2012 republican primary, about the republican presidential candidates, Barack Obama, economy, GOP, leftwing, Mitt Romney, race for the white house, radical, republicans running for president in 2012, the 2012 presidential election, the economy, White House 2012, whitehouse2012, Who is running for President, Who will win the presidential election, wordpress political blogs |