The media is shocked to see the pronounced dead TEA Party raking in cash. They shouldn’t be. At the same time, the media is making hay out of Obama contributions compared to Romney’s. This is a false comparison. Romney fundraising compared to Obama fundraising is apples and oranges. Here’s why:
Romney has not positioned himself as an inspiring political figure. He hasn’t made the election about himself. He has made it about Obama’s record. In fact, it should be no surprise at all at all that TEA Party conservatives who consistently split their vote in the primaries for the non-Romney candidates would rather give to the TEA Party than to Romney. Have no fear, they will vote non-Obama in November.
Obama on the other hand is one of the few inspiring characters left in the Democrat party. Don’t expect massive donations to a DNC run by Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. Don’t expect people to be inspired to give when they see Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid’s face. But when Obama starts flashing Forward and talking about how nobody believed in America but him and how he shot Bin Laden and brought our troops home from Iraq, that sells. Democrats aren’t going to shell out for DNC 2012 congressional elections or DNC superpacs, but they’ll buy Obama T-shirts and bumper stickers and pay for a one in a million shot at having a dinner with the President.
When political commentators measure campaign cash, really they should compare Obama to generic conservative groups and Romney to DNC pacs and superpacs. In the end, the people who vote for Obama in 2012 will probably vote “D” down the line, and the people who contribute to the TEA Party and other Republican groups will show up to vote against Obama.
Filed under: Mitt Romney, Polls, President Obama, TEA Party | Tagged: 2012, 529, Barack Obama, Bill Maher, campaign, campaign cash, Congress, dnc, fundraiser, house, maher, Mitt Romney, obama, PAC, pelosi, reid, rnc, Romney, Senate, superpac, tea, Tea Party, wall street journal, Wasserman Schultz, wsj |