Obama, Holder, Demand Letter #3 And Two Dead Americans

Was Fast and Furious a gun control political initiative? The operation was designed to take down top Mexican drug cartel members. To accomplish this, our government asked American gun shop owners to sell weapons to low-ranking gang members and/or other straw-purchasers. Once the transaction was completed all the ATF had to do was follow the guns and then bust the bad guys. At least, that’s what Obama, Holder and all gun-hating liberals want you to think. Turns out, what really occurred was a wee bit different.

Between 2009 and 2011, some 2,000 guns were bought. During this time, as the operation progressed, shop owners and several ATF agents on the front lines started to express concerns about the validity of the program. Why were they gun shy? Well, the results just weren’t there. For some reason, step #2 of the operation — following the guns to the big fish — just wasn’t happening.

Remember, these are drug guys that play for keeps. They aren’t buying pocketbook pistols or collector pieces. They want assault rifles that mean business. Sure, we arrested some of the errand-boys. But most would agree, selling thousands of guns so you can bust a few gum-chewing teenagers just isn’t the stuff of legendary law enforcement. In fact, as of October 2011, multiple years into the operation, no major cartel leaders had been brought down.

Well, time ticked by. One month slipped into another. Agents here and there moaned and groaned about the operation’s inefficiency but the cash registers kept ringing and Mexicans kept dying. To date, some 300 Mexican deaths have been tied to Fast and Furious guns.

And then in mid-December 2010, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, during a shootout in Arizona, was shot and killed. When the weapon used against Agent Terry was discovered to be a Fast and Furious gun, the reaction was fast and furious.

The story briefly made national headlines — the death of Agent Terry, not the Fast and Furious operation. But the minimal headlines were enough. Whistle blowers came forward. Even when the left-leaning media abandoned the story, those on the right demanded answers to basic questions.

And then in February 2011, just two months after Agent Terry was killed, ICE Special Agent Jaime Zapata was gunned down in Mexico by someone using another Fast and Furious gun.

How did this happen? Holder, America’s top cop, said he knew nothing about Fast and Furious. Who authorized the government to allow illegal gun sales? Obama said he didn’t know anything about it. Who was in charge then? Why weren’t the guns followed? Who came up with the idea? The supreme ruler and the top cop again claimed ignorance.

Remember, there are two Americans dead. There are some 300 Mexicans dead. There are ATF agents crying foul and gun shop owners claiming they were asked to sell the guns. Somebody, somewhere knows something.

At this point, and it’s understandable, Republican Darrell Issa and his House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform had to get involved. The investigation starts. Over time, as the months pass, there are some employee transfers and resignations and people refusing to testify. Most importantly, the top cop is caught in a couple lies, pardon me, miss-statements — about not knowing anything and then knowing something but not until such and such a time. Issa wants documents. The top cop says he sent them. Issa says he didn’t send the correct ones, the top cop says sorry, and so on and so forth.

After some 18 months pass, Issa, now grinding his teeth, tells the top cop, produce the docs or we’re going to hold you in contempt of Congress. Democrats, knowing Holder is now out of time, hit the airwaves in mass claiming the investigation is a witch hunt, it’s a political ploy in an election year and, just yesterday, that it is a racially motivated attack against Holder because he’s black. But, Democrats also know there is more to this than election year politics.

Meanwhile, our top cop runs to the supreme ruler and says, ‘hey, my ass is in it here’. The supreme ruler invokes executive privilege so Holder doesn’t have to hand over the docs. What is the significance of the documents? Why, if it was just an operation gone bad, did Holder withhold documents for over a year? Why, now, on the eve of a contempt vote does the supreme ruler step in and claim executive privilege? Why the doc-lock?

And that brings us to the 2nd Amendment and the twisted need for liberals to have gun control. (Continued)

Holder has a long history of gun control advocacy. Addressing the Women’s National Democratic Club, Holder stated of gun control, “We just have to be repetitive about this. It’s not enough to have a catchy ad on a Monday and then only do it every Monday. We have to do this every day of the week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.”

Obama, for political survival claims to support for the 2nd Amendment. Yet, he supports the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). What’s that? It’s an international treaty — currently being negotiated — that will “impose massive restrictions on U.S. gun rights.” These would include mandatory registration and licenses for firearms, banning of certain firearms, and — in a classic left tactic — would re-define manufacturing so adding accessories to a gun, say a scope, would require the owner to obtain a “manufacturing license”.

So, if you’re a “bitter” American that “clings to guns or religion”, do yourself a favor, and don’t believe the supreme ruler when he’s says he’s supports your right to own a gun. It’s rubbish.

Considering this, is it so outrageous to think the supreme ruler and the top cop hatched a secret scheme to boost gun control? The plan isn’t complicated. Simply flood Mexico with guns and as the bodies pile up, you pile on the anti-gun rhetoric.

In December 2011, Sharyl Attkisson for CBS obtained documents showing the ATF discussed using the covert operation “Fast and Furious” to argue for controversial new rules about gun sales. She wrote, “ATF officials didn’t intend to publicly disclose their own role in letting Mexican cartels obtain the weapons, but emails show they discussed using the sales…to justify a new gun regulation called ‘Demand Letter 3’.” Ms. Attkisson made note that the Justice Department, ATF and specific individuals in her story wouldn’t comment.

Demand Letter 3 would require some 8,500 firearms dealers to report gun sales to the government. It was to apply to four southwest states: Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas. Interesting that all these states border Mexico, isn’t it?

Well, it’s no surprise that on April 25, 2011, ATF announced plans to implement Demand Letter 3 saying it was needed because they had reasonably targeted guns used most often to “commit violent crimes in Mexico, especially by drug gangs.”

So, the ATF kicks in a reporting requirement for American gun dealers based upon their observation that Mexico has huge amounts of high powered American arms. Convenient, yes? The problem is, it’s an illegal attempt to enforce a gun control requirement that Congress never passed.

But, the supreme ruler walks the tight-rope of law like he was trained by the Wallenda family. He feels the Constitution is an irritant and he will distort it, stomp on it or ignore it when he sees fit. Is it really so outrageous to think he and other hard-left liberals would pull a stunt like this to further their ideology? If there’s nothing to this then why the doc-lock?

And here’s another thing to keep in mind. Obama and his people have demonstrated beyond all doubt that they are all politics, all the time. Every chess move Obama makes is with larger political goals and objectives in mind. The left loves him for this. He’s the anointed one. They get tingles running up their legs and their eyes glaze over at the mere thought of Obama’s political prowess.

If he’s really that good, then clearly, he and his imperial wizards could conceive of a simple scheme to flood Mexico with guns and make a case for gun control. Better yet, don’t tell Mexico’s president and eventually he’ll complain. An international complaint just supports your case.

Heck, if you were real good — if you thought you were a world-class political tactician, you could also go soft on border security. That way, you win twice. You pick up support for being an open border guy and, if you get lucky and  the guns make their way back into the states, you can scream they’re an immediate threat to whip up support. Maybe you could even issue some sort of gun control Executive Order. Ultimately, if things unraveled, you could just claim ‘executive privilege’.

You could try this — if you thought you were a world-class political tactician.

Follow at IMCitizen.net

One Response

  1. Who are they trying to buffalo,the OK to do anything of this order had to COME FROM THE TOP.ovomit and holder on down had to know what was going on.The whole sceam was to gather evadence so they “ovomit and holder” and the ATF could say the guns were coming from the U.S. and in order to stop the gun running ovomit would have to suspend the second amendment (take OUR guns)BUT it BACKFIRED on them and when Border Agent Terry got killed they tried to cover it up.The government was doing the gun running they are the ones that killed border agent TERRY.NOBAMA 2012 NOBAMA 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: