As President Obama enters the last three weeks of his reelection effort, he finds himself facing a tide that is turning against him. Between his disastrous debate performance, a still stagnant economy, and continued unbearably high unemployment, polls seem to indicate that President Obama is finally being held accountable for his record. But another recent event that the President has been trying his best to avoid accountability for is proving particularly hard for him to evade. It is the tragic terrorist backed assassinations of four Americans within the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.
Since the murder of Chris Stevens, our Ambassador to Libya, and the three members of his security detail, the Obama Administration has taken a tragic event and turned it into a scandal by trying to deny and hide the facts leading up to the attack and the facts surrounding the distortions and misleading statements from the Administration after the attacks. But on Wednesday, as the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee began hearings in to the matter, Democrats used the opportunity to help President Obama’s reelection effort. Instead of seeking a legitimate line of questioning that would have helped to explain exactly what was behind the Administration’s continued misleading statements about the events in Benghazi, Democrats on the committee did their best to ensure that President Obama was not held accountable for either the apparent vulnerability of our representatives to the violent acts that took place, or the lack of honesty about the attacks in the days and weeks following it.
Leading this liberal reelection strategy for the President during the hearing was Maryland Representative Elijah Cummings and District of Columbia Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton. The two of them used their opening statements to claim that the deaths of the four Americans in Benghazi were due to Republican cuts in the budget… specifically cuts in the levels of funding to embassies and consulates. it’s a charge that was first made back on October 2, by Nancy “We Don’t Know What’s in The Bill” Pelosi.
On the surface, the argument sounds like a plausible factor in the success of the attack on our Libyan consulate. However; when one understands the facts ignored within the claim, they become privy to just how ludicrous the charge is and they also get an insightful look at exactly how hypocritical, deceitful and disingenuous Democrats and their argument are.
Cummings and his fellow liberal liars are referring specifically to the final fiscal year 2012 omnibus appropriations package that included $2.075 billion for the State Departments embassy and consulate security programs. It is a figure that is $567.5 million less than what the Obama administration’s requested. And while it is true that Republicans proposed the bill that contained these cuts, it is also true that while a total of 147 Republicans supported the bill, 149 Democrats also cast their final vote for the bill and the cuts contained in it. And Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democrat member of the House Oversight Committee who is blaming the cuts for the murder of 4 representatives in Benghazi, was one of them.
This raises several major issues.
1.- Were The Cuts Responsible For the Successful Terrorist Attack in Benghazi?
When asked in Wednesday’s hearing if the refusal to provide more security was caused by budget cuts to embassy security, Charlene Lamb, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Programs replied “No, sir”. So according to Lamb, a lack of available financial resources was not behind the lack of proper security in Benghazi.
2.- What Was Responsible For the Lack of Proper Security in Benghazi?
According to Eric Nordstrom, the man responsible for security in Libya, told member of the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday that the Obama Administration decided to “hope everything would” change for the better rather than provide additional security.
“So when I requested resources, when I requested assets, instead of supporting those assets, I was criticized,”
Nordstrum further stated;
“There was no plan. And it was hoped that everything would get better.”
3.- Why Are Democrats Lying?
Democrats know that the President screwed up here. But admitting that would be too detrimental to not only the President’s reelection chances, but to the rest of their ticket in several states where Democrats have tight House and Senate contests that their candidates can’t afford a lack of long presidential coattails in. So in a desperate attempt to change the negative Benghazi narrative that is adding to the President’s recent downward spiral, they are searching for any excuse that could buy them time between now and Election day.
Given the facts cited above though, while it is clear that budget cuts were not responsible for the lack of security provided at our Libyan consulate, it is quite clear that the Obama Administration was ignoring the threat to our consulate and the staff operating in it. There is even evidence that a decision was made within the Administration to deny the construction of a bob wired fence around the consulate because Obama officials did not like the fact that such a measure would look like there was a a problem that required additional security in Benghazi.
All of this is further evidence of a President and Administration that was negligent in the Benghazi terrorist attack and the President, the State Department, and congressional Democrats all know this to be the case. That is why they have been trying to cover every aspect of this tragedy up since it occurred on 9/11/12.
It all started with their denial to admit that it was an attack by terrorists. Why? Becuase the Administration did not want to use the word terrorist, especially in relation to the date… 9/11. The relationship of the word and date makes it hard for the Administration to explain why on the anniversary of the infamous September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on our nation, our embassies and consulates did not experience the type of heightened security that they usually do on that? The need for additional security on that date is something which should not require any increased intelligence from the C.I.A. or F.B.I. It merely requires average intelligence, something which the Obama Administration obviously lacks.
But it gets worse.
Fearful that they would not be able to defend their decision not to increase security on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11 or to follow up on requests for additional security at the consulate during the rest of the year, in their attempt to avoid admitting that the attack was the work of terrorists, the Obama regime tried to claim the assassinations in Benghazi were attributed to a violent protest that was prompted by a video that offended Muslims. The problem is that both initial assertions were wrong and the Administration knew they were wrong. This means those initial statement that came out after the attack were lies. Mounting evidence has demonstrated that the Administration knew there was no protest prior to the attack, knew that terrorists were behind the attack, and they knew that the Benghazi consulate was at high risk of a terrorist attack. But the continued attempts by the Administration to mislead us ever since the attack first took place have now snowballed and are quickly turning a disastrous national security policy decision into a humiliating and possibly criminal coverup scandal. As a result, the Administration is now not only beginning to be held accountable for the negligence of their policies that led to the deaths of our Libyan staff, their continued lies are implicating them more and more each day in the apparent attempt to coverup their negligence.
The recent outrageous and hypocritical attempts by Cummings and others on the left to blame the Benghazi attacks on Republicans sponsored budget cuts is just another example of how desperate Democrats are to ignore the facts and rid themselves and their President of the need to be held responsible for their actions that led to the deaths of our Ambassador and his three man security team, and the attempted coverup of the facts after the attack.
Making matters worse is a media that has now become complicit in this recent lie.
Outlets like the always unreliable Huffington Compost have gone out of their way to feature posts which continue to advance the narrative that Republican budget cuts were responsible for the deaths in Benghazi. If such reporting was intended to be a sincere presentation of facts, how come they refuse to report “all” the facts? All the facts that demonstrate how utterly false the charge is and all the facts that demonstrate even if the charge was true, Democrats, including those who made the charge, supported the budget cuts in numbers greater than Republicans.
Filed under: Obama Scandal | Tagged: 149 democrats voted to cut security funding of our embassies, 2012, 2012 election coverage, 2012 election sites, 2012 election websites, 2012 Presidential Election, 2012 presidential election sites, 2012 race for president, 2012 Republican presidential candidates, 2012 Republican presidential election coverage, Anthony Del Pellegrino, Barack Obama, Benghazi, Benghazi budget cuts, Benghazi coverup, Benghazi scandal, Benghazigate, Consolidated Appropriations Act, democrats, democrats supported funding cuts in embassy security, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for International Programs Charlen Lamb, Eleanor Holmes Norton, election websites, Elijah Cummings, Eric Nordstrom, House Oversight Hearing into Libay, Huffington Compost, Huffington post lies, kempite, legislation cutting security budget for embassies, libya, meet the candidates, Mitt Romney for President, obama, Obama administration, Obama coverup scandal, Obama Libyan scandal, Paul Ryan bio, presidential election coverage, presidential election websites, Romney 2012, Romney Ryan 2012, State Department, the 2012 presidential election, top ten 2012 presidential election websites, United States, United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, What Was Responsible For the lack of Proper Security in Benghazi, Where The Cuts Responsible For the Successful Terrorist Attack in Benghazi?, White House 2012, whitehouse12, whitehouse2012, Who will win the presidential election, why democrats are lying about Libya, wordpress political blogs |