Obama Finds the Writing on the Wall in the Sands of the Jersey Shore

Bookmark and Share  On Wednesday, as Barack Obama flew over the devastated coastal section of storm ravaged New Jersey , the White House Press pool released video of the truly heart wrenching images that the President saw.  But as he approached Point Pleasant, one of the locales hardest by Hurricane Sandy, he saw something that the White House advance team missed.  It was the oversized writing in the sand of the name “Romney”.

While the writing in the sands of New Jersey are not a likely indication of which way New Jersey’s electoral votes will go, what it is representative of is the the level of enthusiasm that Romney supporters have for their candidate.   It’s a level of enthusiasm and energy that just might prove to make the difference in the presidential election in several key states such as Ohio, Florida, Virginia, Iowa and Nevada, where the depth of support Romney’s supporters have for Mitt, runs deeper than the level of support and amount of energy and enthusiasm that Obama supporters have for President Obama.

The amount of enthusiasm that supporters have for their candidate is a key component behind the success of any campaign’s Get-Out-The-Vote operation.  GOTV efforts increase the number of the campaign’s supporters who will vote for their candidate in the election.  Typically, the more enthusiastic supporters are for their candidate, the more of them a campaign can “Get-Out-To-Vote” for its candidate.  In 2012, as demonstrated by the Romney voters behind this message for the President in Point Pleasant, Romney supporters are quite passionate in their support of Mitt.

So while the writing in the sand that President Obama saw may not turn back the tide when it comes to which way heavily Democratic New Jersey will vote on November 6th, it was a sign of the writing on the wall that awaits the President when it comes to the collective results of all the sates in the nation.

Meanwhile as the President took time to visit New Jersey as it was trying to recover from Hurricane Sandy, many New Jerseyans like myself are still wondering what good President Obama’s visit did for the Garden State.

Aside from consuming the time and energy of government resources that might have been better used on other pressing matters confronting the people of New Jersey, the visit really did nothing but cost taxpayers money. Yet President Obama decided to “act” presidential and visit the Garden State as New Jerseyans began to piece their lives back together.  From my vantage point here in New Jersey where life has just become much harder, the President’s visit served one purpose and one purpose only.  It allowed the President to act presidential, somenthing which is a change of pace for Obama, who in recent weeks has been acting anything but presidential on the campaign trail where his big issues have been Big Bird, bayonets, and binders, or in the Oval Office where on issues such as Benghazi instead of allowing the buck to stop with him, he has been passing the buck.

Which is why for me, the best part of President Obama’s P.R. stunt was the blunt New Jersey-style, in-your-face, message written for the President amid the ruins of the Jersey Shore.  It proved to me that if Romney supporters are willing to take the time to write Romney’s name in the sands savaged by a super-storm, than they will certainly be turning out to vote for Romney in the quiet calm of the voting booth.

Bookmark and Share

Romney Pulls Ahead of Obama in Ohio

   Bookmark and Share   President Obama’s failure to stop the continued momentum of Mitt Romney in the final days of the election has now allowed Romney to pull ahead of the President in the battleground state of Ohio where according to a new Rasmussen poll, Governor Romney now has a two-point advantage.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of likely Ohio voters shows Romney with 50 percent support to President Obama’s 48 percent. According to the poll, 1 percent likes a third party candidate, while another one percent remains undecided.

Rasmussen also finds that among all Ohio voters, Romney now has a 12-point lead over the President in voter trust – 53 percent to 41 percent – when it comes to the economy. Last week, Romney had just a seven-point advantage among voters in the state when they were asked which candidate they trusted more to deal with the economy.

Romney’s also trusted more by eight points in the areas of job creation and energy policy but leads Obama by just two when it comes to housing
issues.  And when it comes to national security Governor Romney now has a 52 percent to 42 percent advantage on the issue.

All of this is evidence of the fact that Romney continues to ride a wave of momentum which is tipping the election in his favor more and more with the passage of each day.

While White House 2012 knows that Ohio is relatively close, our own analysis of polls, data, and circumstances on the ground in each state and nationally, has projected that Mitt Romney will in fact ultimately see Ohio’s 18 electoral votes go to Romney.  Interestingly, that same analysis produced evidence that upended the existing narrative that Mitt Romney can’t win the presidency without Ohio. WH12’s newest analysis showed just the opposite.

For President Obama, while he has three paths to victory two less than Romney, each of one them requires that to win the election, the President must win Ohio.

For Mitt Romney, of the five routes to victory available to him, only one of them requires that he wins Ohio, and as seen in the graphic below, that path is the one which he needs only if he losses each of the other remaining tossup states.

This latest Rasmussen poll is of course a mere snapshot of opinions at the moment and while there is room for error in the poll and the possibility for  voter sentiments to change within the next 7 days, existing evidence indicates that such a reversal of fortunes for Romney is unlikely.Bookmark and Share

The Liberal Des Moines Register Turns Its Back On Obama and Endorses Romney for President

   Bookmark and Share   Not since Richard Nixon was running for reelection in 1972 has the The Des Moines Register endorsed a Republican for President.  But on Sunday, Iowa’s largest paper did just that after it concluded that Mitt Romney “offers a fresh economic vision”.  The conclusion was essentially arrived because of the opinion that Romney’s business and executive background made him the best candidate to”unlock this nation’s economic potential.”

Despite endorsing the promise of Barack Obama’s hope and change in 2008, in their 2012 endorsement of Mitt Romney, the liberal leaning editorial staff of the Des Moines wrote;

“Voters should give Mitt Romney a chance to correct the nation’s fiscal course and to implode the partisan gridlock that has shackled Washington and the rest of America — with the understanding that he would face the same assessment in four years if he does not succeed,”

While I doubt that any newspaper endorsements actually changes the minds of any significant number of voters, the important element regarding the endorsement of Romney by a liberal based editorial board is that is shows clear evidence  of the fact that even a portion of the President’s liberal base recognize that there is no denying that President Obama’s  failed record and policies do not warrant him a second term in the White House.

From the endorsement:

Ten months ago this newspaper endorsed former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney for the Republican nomination for president. An overarching consideration was which of the party’s candidates could we see occupying the White House, and there was no question that Romney was qualified for the job.

Now, in the closing days of the general election campaign, the question is which of the two contenders deserves to be the next president of the United States.

Both President Barack Obama and Governor Romney are superbly qualified. Both are graduates of the Harvard University Law School who have distinguished themselves in government, in public service and in private life. Both are devoted husbands and fathers.

American voters are deeply divided about this race. The Register’s editorial board, as it should, had a vigorous debate over this endorsement. Our discussion repeatedly circled back to the nation’s single most important challenge: pulling the economy out of the doldrums, getting more Americans back in the workforce in meaningful jobs with promising futures, and getting the federal government on a track to balance the budget in a bipartisan manner that the country demands.

Meanwhile as The Des Moines Register broke it’s 40 year long streak of rubber stamping liberal presidents,  The New York Times unsurprisingly endorsed the President today, thereby extending their unbroken string of endorsements for Democratic candidates to 56 years.

Bookmark and Share

Big Change: Romney’s Major Address on The Economy (Full Speech and Transcript)

   Bookmark and Share  On Friday, as President Barack Obama sat down in the Blue Room of the White House to conduct an in-depth interview with MTV’s Sway, Mitt Romney used his campaign for President as an opportunity to discuss the economy.   (See complete video of the speech below and a transcript of the speech below that).  And as President Obama was telling “Sway” how he thought the most vibrant form of music right now is hip-hop, Mitt Romney stood before a crowd of 2,000 Americans in Ames Iowa, at the site of a construction company, and discussed something that might not have been quite as topical to MTV as the President’s musical tastes.  Romney chose to discuss the economy, an issue President Obama continues to try to avoid talking about.

With some 11 days to go before Election Day, the dichotomy between the topics the two men chose to focus on presented serious voters with evidence of there being a sharp contrast between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama when it comes to their priorities.  As Barack Obama chose to pander to the bubble gum blowing, pop-culture element of the electorate who is more concerned with voting for someone who spends most of their time debating who to vote for on American Idol, Mitt Romney was addressing concerned, responsible, educated voters who are more concerned with electing a President whose priorities include restoring America to greatness, not who the most popular Rap artists is.

Beyond anything else, the contrast is an embarrassing one for our President and for Americans in general.  It is an example not only of vastly different styles and priorities, it is evidence of just how while the Republican challenger for President is more willing to win this election on the issues important to our future, our incumbent President seeks to win this election by hammering together a plurality of voters that is comprised largely of people who have more knowledge about every word in Katy Perry’s latest song than they are of the words in our Constitution.  This should offend voters.  Furthermore; it is a clear indication of the President’s obvious awareness of the fact that he cannot win this election on the issues and on his record.  it is why he has spent most of time on the sofa’s of The View and every late night entertainment program that the mainstream media has to offer.

The Speech

Aside from the contrast between what the two men chose to speak about on Friday, is the content in Mitt Romney’s speech.  It was a speech that served two purposes for Romney.  It helped to remind people of the contrast in campaigns that has Barack Obama’s campaign talking about little things like Big Bird, binders, Mitt Romney is talking about the ideas worthy of a great nation.  In this case Romney addressed our economic future and it was speech worthy of a great future President.  It was a powerful, factual endictment of the President failed reocrd on the economy.   As Romney pointed out;

 “President Obama frequently reminds us that he inherited a troubled economy,” Romney said. But he also “inherited the most productive and innovative nation in history. He inherited the largest economy in the world…. What he inherited wasn’t the only problem; what he did with what he inherited made the problem worse.”

He added;

“Despite all that he inherited, President Obama did not repair our economy, he did not save Medicare and Social Security, he did not tame the spending and borrowing, he did not reach across the aisle to bring us together. Nor did he stand up to China’s trade practices, or deliver on his promise to re-make our relations with the Muslim world, where anti-American extremism is on the rise.”

But the speech was also an inspiring artiuclation of Romney’s economic vision for America, a vision that included concrete proposals to get the economic engine of our nation moving again.

If you have not taken the time to hear this speech, you should.  It may not be as scintilating as watching Mariah Carey and Nicki Minaj having a catfight on American Idol but it is far more imporatant and inspirational.

Complete Transcript of the Speech;

Thank you all.  It’s great to be back in Iowa. And don’t think that this is the last time you are going to see Paul Ryan and me, because you Iowans may well be the ones who decide what kind of America we will have, what kind of life our families will have.

The choice you make this November will shape great things, historic things, and those things will determine the most intimate and important aspects of every American life and every American family. This is an election about America, and it is an election about the American family.

All elections matter. This one matters a great deal. Over the years of our nation’s history, choices our fellow citizens have made have changed the country’s course–they were turning points of defining consequence.

We are at a turning point today. Our national debt and liabilities threaten to crush our future, our economy struggles under the weight of government and fails to create essential growth and employment.

At the same time, emerging powers seek to shape the world in their image–China with its model of authoritarianism and, in a very different way, Jihadists with Sharia, repression, and terror for the world.

This is an election of consequence.  Our campaign is about big things, because we happen to believe that America faces big challenges.  We recognize this is a year with a big choice, and the American people want to see big changes.  And together we can bring real change to this country.

Four years ago, candidate Obama spoke to the scale of the times. Today, he shrinks from it, trying instead to distract our attention from the biggest issues to the smallest–from characters on Sesame Street and silly word games to misdirected personal attacks he knows are false.

The President’s campaign falls far short of the magnitude of the times. And the presidency of the last four years has fallen far short of the promises of his last campaign. Four years ago, America voted for a post-partisan president, but they have seen the most political of presidents, and a Washington in gridlock because of it.

President Obama promised to bring us together, but at every turn, he has sought to divide and demonize. He promised to cut the deficit in half, but he doubled it. And his budget?  It failed to win a single vote, Republican or Democrat, in either the House or the Senate. He said he would reform Medicare and Social Security and save them from pending insolvency, but he shrunk from proposing any solution at all.

And then, where are the jobs?  Where are the 9 million more jobs that President Obama promised his stimulus would have created by now?  They are in China, Mexico, and Canada and in countries that have made themselves more attractive for entrepreneurs and business and investment, even as President Obama’s policies have made it less attractive for them here.

And so today, his campaign tries to deflect and detract, to minimize the failures, and to make this election about small shiny objects.

But this election matters more than that. It matters to your family.

It matters to the senior who needs to get an appointment with a medical specialist but is told by one receptionist after another that the doctor isn’t taking any new Medicare patients, because Medicare has been slashed to pay for Obamacare.

It matters to the man from Waukesha, Wisconsin I spoke with several days ago.  In what were supposed to be his best work years, he used to have a job at $25 an hour with benefits and now has one at $8 an hour, without benefits.

It matters to the college student, graduating this spring, with 10 to 20 thousand dollars in student debt, who now learns that she also will be paying for 50 thousand dollars in government debt, a burden that will put the American Dream beyond her reach.

It matters for the child in a failing school, unable to go to the school of his parent’s choosing, because the teacher’s union that funds the President’s campaign opposes school choice.

The President’s campaign has a slogan: it is “forward.” But to the 23 million Americans struggling to find a good job, these last four years feel a lot more like “backward.” We cannot afford four more years like the last four years.

This election is about big things–like the education of our children, the value of our homes, the take home pay from our jobs, the price of the gasoline we buy, and the choices we have in our healthcare. It is also about the big things that determine these things–like the growth of the economy, the strength of our military, our dependence on foreign oil, and America’s leadership in the world.

President Obama frequently reminds us that he inherited a troubled economy. But a troubled economy is not all that President Obama inherited. He inherited the greatest nation in the history of the earth. He inherited the most productive and innovative nation in history. He inherited the largest economy in the world. And he inherited a people who have always risen to the occasion, regardless of the challenges they faced, so long as we have been led by men and women who have brought us together, called on our patriotism, and guided the nation with vision and conviction.

Despite all that he inherited, President Obama did not repair our economy, he did not save Medicare and Social Security, he did not tame the spending and borrowing, he did not reach across the aisle to bring us together. Nor did he stand up to China’s trade practices, or deliver on his promise to re-make our relations with the Muslim world, where anti-American extremism is on the rise.

What he inherited wasn’t the only problem; what he did with what he inherited made the problem worse.

In just four short years, he borrowed nearly $6 trillion, adding almost as much debt held by the public as all prior American presidents in history.

He forced through Obamacare, frightening small business from hiring new employees and adding thousands of dollars to every family’s healthcare bill.

He launched an onslaught of new regulations, often to the delight of the biggest banks and corporations, but to the detriment of the small, growing businesses that create two-thirds of our jobs.

New business starts are at a 30-year low because entrepreneurs and investors are sitting on the sidelines, weary from the President’s staggering new regulations and proposed massive tax increases.

Many families can’t get mortgages and many entrepreneurs can’t get loans because of Dodd-Frank regulations that make it harder for banks to lend.

The president invested taxpayer money–your money–in green companies, now failed, that met his fancy, and sometimes were owned by his largest campaign contributors. He spent billions of taxpayer dollars on investments like Solyndra, Tesla, Fisker, and Ener1, which only added to our mounting federal debt.

Energy prices are up in part because energy production on federal lands is down.  He rejected the Keystone Pipeline from Canada, and cut in half drilling permits and leases, even as gasoline prices soared to new highs.

No, the problem with the Obama economy is not what he inherited; it is with the misguided policies that slowed the recovery, and caused millions of Americans to endure lengthy unemployment and poverty. That is why 15 million more of our fellow citizens are on food stamps than when President Obama was sworn into office. That is why 3 million more women are now living in poverty. That is why nearly 1 in 6 Americans today is poor.  That is why the economy is stagnant.

Today, we received the latest round of discouraging economic news:  Last quarter, our economy grew at just 2%.  After the stimulus was passed, the White House promised the economy would now be growing at 4.3%, over twice as fast.  Slow economic growth means slow job growth and declining take home pay. This is what four years of President Obama’s policies have produced. Americans are ready for change–for growth, for jobs, for more take home pay.

We have had four presidential and vice-presidential debates. And there is nothing in what the President proposed or defended that has any prospect of meeting the challenges of the times. Raising taxes will not grow jobs or ignite the economy–in fact, his tax plan has been calculated to destroy 700,000 jobs. A new stimulus, three years after the recession officially ended, may spare government, but it will not stimulate the private sector any better than did the stimulus of four years ago. And cutting one trillion dollars from the military will kill jobs and devastate our national defense.

This is not the time to double down on the trickle-down government policies that have failed us; it is time for new bold changes that measure up to the moment, that can bring America’s families the certainty that the future will be better than the past.

If Paul Ryan and I are elected as your president and vice president, we will endeavor with all our hearts and energy to restore America. Instead of more spending, more borrowing from China and higher taxes from Washington, we’ll renew our faith in the power of free people pursuing their dreams.  We’ll start with our plan for a stronger middle class, which has five elements:

One, we will act to put America on track to a balanced budget by eliminating unnecessary programs, by sending programs back to states where they can be managed with less abuse and less cost, and by shrinking the bureaucracy of Washington.

Two, we’ll produce more of the energy we need to heat our homes, fill our cars, and make our economy grow.  We will stop the Obama war on coal, the disdain for oil, and the effort to crimp natural gas by federal regulation of the very technology that produces it. We will support nuclear and renewables, but phase out subsidies once an industry is on its feet. And rather than investing in new electric auto and solar companies, we will invest in energy science and research to make discoveries that can actually change our energy world. And by 2020, we will achieve North American energy independence.

Three, we will make trade work for America.  We’ll open more markets to American agriculture, products, and services. And we will finally hold accountable any nation that doesn’t play by the rules.  I will stand up for the rights and interests of American workers and employers.

Four, we will grow jobs by making America the best possible place for job creators, for entrepreneurs, for small business, for innovators, for manufacturers. This we will do by updating and reshaping regulations to encourage growth, by lowering tax rates while lowering deductions and closing loopholes, and by making it clear from day one that unlike the current administration, we actually like business and the jobs business creates.

Finally, as we create more opportunity, we also will make sure that our citizens have the skills to succeed. Training programs will be shaped by the states where people live, and schools will put the interests of our kids, their parents, and their teachers above the interests of the teachers’ unions.

If we do those five things, our economy will come roaring back. We will create 12 million new jobs in just four years, raise take-home pay, and get the American economy growing at four percent a year—more than double this year’s rate. After all the false promises of recovery and all the waiting, we will finally see help for America’s middle class.

Paul and I won’t stop there. When we take office, we will take responsibility to solve the big problems that everyone agrees can’t wait any longer.

We will save and secure Medicare and Social Security, both for current and near retirees, and for the generation to come. We will restore the $716 billion President Obama has taken from Medicare to pay for his vaunted Obamacare.

We will reform healthcare to tame the growth in its cost, to provide for those with pre-existing conditions, and to assure that every American has access to healthcare. We will replace government choice with consumer choice, bringing the dynamics of the marketplace to a sector of our lives that has long been dominated by government.

These things among others we can only do if we work tirelessly to bridge the divide between the political parties. We will meet with Democrat and Republican leadership regularly, we will look for common ground and shared principles, and we will put the interests of the American people above the interests of the politicians.

I know something about leading because I’ve led before.  In business, at the Olympics, and in Massachusetts, I’ve brought people together to achieve real change.

I was elected as a Republican governor in a state with a legislature that was 85% Democrat. We were looking at a multi-billion dollar budget gap. But instead of fighting with one another, we came together to solve our problems. We actually cut spending–reduced it. We lowered taxes 19 times. We defended school choice. And we worked to make our state business friendly.

Our state moved up 20 places in job growth. Our schools were ranked number one in the nation.  And we turned a $3 billion budget deficit into a $2 billion rainy day fund.

I know it because I have seen it: Good Democrats can come together with good Republicans to solve big problems. What we need is leadership.

America is ready for that kind of leadership. Paul Ryan and I will provide it. Our plan for a stronger middle class will create jobs, stop the decline in take home pay, and put America back on the path of prosperity and opportunity. And this will enable us to fulfill our responsibility as the leader of the free world, to promote the principles of peace. We will help the Muslim world combat the spread of extremism; we will dissuade Iran from building a nuclear bomb; we will build enduring relationships throughout Latin America; and we will partner with China and other great nations to build a more stable and peaceful world.

We face big challenges. But we also have big opportunities. New doors are open for us to sell our ideas and our products to the entire world. New technologies offer the promise of unbounded information and limitless innovation. New ideas are changing lives and hearts in diverse nations and among diverse peoples. If we seize the moment and rise to the occasion, the century ahead will be an American Century.

Our children will graduate into jobs that are waiting for them. Our seniors will be confident that their retirement is secure. Our men and women will have good jobs and good pay and good benefits. And we will have every confidence that our lives are safe, and that our livelihoods are secure.

What this requires is change, change from the course of the last four years. It requires that we put aside the small and the petty, and demand the scale of change we deserve: we need real change, big change.

Our campaign is about that kind of change–confronting the problems that politicians have avoided for over a decade, revitalizing our competitive economy, modernizing our education, restoring our founding principles.

This is the kind of change that promises a better future, one shaped by men and women pursuing their dreams in their own unique ways.

This election is a choice between the status quo — going forward with the same policies of the last four years — or instead, choosing real change, change that offers promise, promise that the future will be better than the past.

If you are ready for that kind of change, if you want this to be a turning point in America’s course, join Paul Ryan and me, get your family and friends to join us, and vote now for the kind of leadership that these times demand.

God bless you. And God bless America.

Bookmark and Share

Is It Over for President Obama?

   Bookmark and Share  My years of awareness in regards to presidential politics goes back to Nixon when as I was all of 8 years old and remember Richard Nixon leaving the White House in disgrace.  From there I remember how Gerald Ford fought but failed to win his own full term in office as President.  And then came 1980 when Ronald Reagan sparked my political interest in a way that led to my own dedication to public policy and politics.  Since then I have seen President’s rise and plummet in the polls.  I remember seeing George H.W. Bush go from a popularity rating in the upper eighties in 1991, to losing the election in the Electoral College in a landslide in 1992.  I have witnessed Bill Clinton fall from grace and rise back to iconoclastic popularity.  But never before have I seen a presidential election where a supposedly very popular President saw his reelection unravel quite as quickly as Barack Obama’s has been seeing in the last month.

Evidence of this became overwhelmingly obvious as over the past few days we have seen polls show a decided shift to Mitt Romney among voters nationally.  Since the beginning of the month we have found that among military voters, Romney has a 2 to 1 margin over the President.  We also understand that the Jewish vote which traditionally supports Democrats is being won by Mitt Romney over the President.  New polls also show that Barack Obama’s once 18 point lead over Romneyamong womern has evaporated and today we learn that Mitt Romney has a 19% lead over Barack Obama among independents, the swing voters whose decisions usually determine the winner in any given election.

But in addition to signs of a tide against Barack Obama turning in to a tidal wave that threatens to drown any chance of his getting reelected, we are seeing a President who acts more and more desperate as we approach Election Day.

Instead of demonstrating how presidential he is, Barack Obama is doing an endless tour of late night talk shows from Jon Stewart to Jay Leno as  our President avoids any hard news outlets in favor of low brow, pop culture entertainment programs.   Then when he is not sitting aside TV personalities discussing his favorite color, he is on the campaign trail discussing little things such as Mitt Romney’s unwillingness to provide Big Bird with a taxpayer funded government handout.  And as we listen to his references to binders and Big Bird and hear about our President claiming to reporters that even six year old children can see Mitt Romney is a “bullshitter”, Americans can’t help but be struck by how truly unpresidential our President has become.

Meanwhile, as the pressure of the election continues to get to the President and reveal the flaws in this once messianic figure of the liberal lore, we are not hearing anything about the 24 million Americans out of work and how he will get them back to work.  We are not hearing anything about the national debt that is now so burdensome it is considered a national security risk.  And speaking of national security we are also not hearing anything about the national security scandal and coverup surrounding the tragic events in Benghazi, Libya.  No, the President refuses to honestly tell us what he knew or when knew it.  He refuses to explain to us why he tried to deny the events in Benghazi were terrorist attacks, even though the evidence shows he did know it was.  Our President refuses to even explain how he never knew that al Qaeda, the terrorist group the President has admitted is our greatest threat in thew world, was establishing itself in Libya after our Ambassador to Libya made the white House aware of that fact in messages sent for as long as two months.

Then this morning I heard from someone who is not running for President.  A man whose only real political activity consists of fulfilling his civic responsibility of making an educated vote.  His name is Charles Woods and he is the father of Tyrone Woods, one of the four Americans killed in the Benghazi terrorist attack. New evidence revealed that Tyrone Woods and the others in the consulate who were killed during the attack, had been pleading for help and the requests were denied.  To this issue Tyrone’s father spoke out.  Charles Woods wants answers.  The revelation did nothing to console the broken hear of father who lost his son. Instead it merely served as a more heartbreak as we are all left wondering who decided to not send in the troops who could have helped save his son and the three other assassinated Americans.  Instead Charles Woods son was left to defend our Ambassador and two other Americans on his own while fighting for his life.

Nothing else matters more than the answers to that right now.  Yet our President is now finishing up a an appearance on MTV after a 48 hour campaign tour that can only be described as a denial tour… denial of the failing economy, denial of no plan to create jobs or cutting our deficit.  Denial of all accountability for every aspect of the failed Obama record, including denials about the facts involving Benghazi.  It is time for our President to take a deep breath and get control of himself.  As our current Commander-In-Chief we need Benghazi explained and the mistakes that allowed Benghazi to come to fruition corrected so that it does not happen again.  We cannot go another day wondering if the pleas for help of another American serving their nation are falling on the deaf ears of a White House and President concerned more with getting virgins to vote for the President than he is with saving the lives of Americans.

So far our President is doing what he does best… avoiding the issue.  Our President refuses to explain any of this.  Instead we are being offered reasons to vote for him based upon sex, false accusations, and promises to deliver in the next four years what he couldn’t deliver in the past four.

While it is premature to suggest the election is over, based upon the more than obvious unravelling of the Obama presidency it is not premature to predict that President Obama is currently on a trajectory that is plummeting to ground faster than a rain drops pouring from the clouds.  And it is not too early to suspect that we are witnessing the makings of the most surprising landslide victory of any challenger to an incumbent President since Reagan overwhelmed Carter.  But more than four years ago, I did predict that Barack Obama was going to be the second coming of Jimmy Carter.  Unfortunately I was wrong.  While Carter’s was a failed presidency, he was not the evil, conniving, liar-in-chief that Barack Obama clearly is.

Bookmark and Share

Is Barack Obama Really a Good Friend to Israel? See the Video

   Bookmark and Share   While Mitt Romney did a good job in the last presidential debate, there was one thing I really think he was remiss in not pointing out.  When the topic of Israel came up, the Governor should have mentioned the unprecedented proposal that President Obama made in 2011 when he told Israel to adopt its 1967 borders. (See the video at the bottom of this post)

With all the attempts by President Obama to claim that he has established the strongest relationship with Israel of any previous President, there are many facts which contradict that claim. Between his refusal to ever visit Israel during his entire term in office, his recent refusal to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while Bebe was visiting the U.S. last month, and a history of Obama snubbing the Prime Minister on many occasions prior to that, it is clear that the American relationship with Israel is not as warm and close as it has been under previous presidents. But one of the most egregious acts against Israel committed by President Obama was his attempt to have Israel return to its indefensible 1967 borders.   It is a point which has not gotten the attention that it should in this election but for good reason, it must.

By trying to have Israel return it’s pre-1967 borders, President Obama was providing Arab states and the Palestinians with the ability to launch ground and missile attacks on the Jewish state with ease.  As explained in this video, a return to those borders would make it impossible for Israel to effectively defend itself against the enemies who surround them and have a great capacity to exploit added opportunities to launch ground and missile attacks.  Yet this is the position that Barack Obama proposed one of closest allies in the world to put themselves in.

During the last presidential debate, Mitt Romney had multiple chances to remind voters of this major Obama foreign policy initiative. And he should have.  At one point Romney reminded voters about Obama’s the apology tour to the Middle East he went on when first coming to office.  Governor Romney reminded us that while the President took the opportunity to fly to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq, he skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region.  It was around then that Romney should have at some point pivoted to President Obama’s 1967 border proposal by adding that while he has apologized to audiences that consisted of our enemies, he has also asked our friends to make fatal concessions to our enemies.  In this case it was a concession that would have moved Israel closer to extinction.

Obama’s attempt to have Israel adopt indefensible borders is a major issue.  It is another sign of his bass ackwards policies.  Policies which seek to placate our enemies and offend our allies.  A policy that is more in the best interests of enemies than our own nation.

When it comes to the Middle East, Israel is the only nation in the region that the United States need not fear a terrorist attack from.  If it is not our only real friend in the Middle East, it is certainly our best.  For that reason alone, it should not have a so-called friend who makes it easier for Israel’s enemies to destroy them.  Yet that is a part of the Obama foreign policy which was not mentioned in any of the debates.  So I have prepared the following video to make the point that Mitt failed to and that others have forget to.

Bookmark and Share

Apology Tour: The New Romney Ad That Highlights Obama’s Bass Ackwards Foreign Policy

Bookmark and Share  In the wake of last night’s final presidential debate of the 2012 election cycle, Mitt Romney has released a new 30 second ad which powerfully explains why many people believe Barack Obama’s foreign policy priorities are as bass ackwards as his failed economic policies

In addition to making its obvious point about the President, the ad also goes a long way in reminding Jewish voters that Barack Obama is not exactly the close friend of Israel that he would like us to believe he is.  That is a critical message for Romney get across to Jewish voters in important battleground states such as Florida where the Jewish is significantly larger than it is in other states.

Bookmark and Share

%d bloggers like this: