GOP Platform

2012

Republican

Party

Platform

Preamble:

The 2012 Republican Platform is a statement of who we are and what we believe as a Party and our vision for a stronger and freer America.

The pursuit of opportunity has defined America from our very beginning. This is a land of opportunity. The American Dream is a dream of equal opportunity for all. And the Republican Party is the party of opportunity.

Today, that American Dream is at risk.

Our nation faces unprecedented uncertainty with great fiscal and economic challenges, and under the current Administration has suffered through the longest and most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Many Americans have experienced the burden of lost jobs, lost homes, and lost hopes. Our middle class has felt that burden most acutely. Meanwhile, the federal government has expanded its size and scope, its borrowing and spending, its debt and deficit. Federalism is threatened and liberty retreats.

For the world, this has been four years of lost American leadership, leadership that depends upon economic vitality and peace through strength.

Put simply: The times call for trustworthy leadership and honest talk about the challenges we face. Our nation and our people cannot afford the status quo. We must begin anew, with profound changes in the way government operates; the way it budgets, taxes, and regulates. Jefferson’s vision of a “wise and frugal government” must be restored.

Providence has put us at the fork in the road, and we must answer the question: If not us, who? If not now, when?

That is the choice facing the American people this November. Every voter will be asked to choose between the chronic high unemployment and the unsustainable debt produced by a big government entitlement society, or a positive, optimistic view of an opportunity society, where any American who works hard, dreams big and follows the rules can achieve anything he or she wants.

The American people possess vast reserves of courage and determination and the capacity to hear the truth and chart a strong course. They are eager for the opportunity to take on life’s challenges and, through faith and hard work, transform the future for the better. They are the most generous people on earth, giving sacrificially of their time, talent, and treasure.

This platform affirms that America has always been a place of grand dreams and even grander realities; and so it will be again, if we return government to its proper role, making it smaller and smarter. If we restructure government’s most important domestic programs to avoid their fiscal collapse. If we keep taxation, litigation, and regulation to a minimum. If we celebrate success, entrepreneurship, and innovation. If we lift up the middle class. If we hand over to the next generation a legacy of growth and prosperity, rather than entitlements and indebtedness.

That same commitment must be present both here at home and abroad. We are a party that knows the difference between international acclaim and world leadership. We will lift the torch of freedom and democracy to inspire all those who would be free. As President Reagan issued the clarion call to “tear down this Wall,” so must we always stand against tyranny and oppression. We will always support and cherish our men and women in uniform who defend our liberties with their lives.

As we embark upon this critical mission, we are not without guidance. We possess an owner’s manual: the Constitution of the United States, the greatest political document ever written. That sacred document shows us the path forward. Trust the people. Limit government. Respect federalism. Guarantee opportunity, not outcomes. Adhere to the rule of law. Reaffirm that our rights come from God, are protected by government, and that the only just government is one that truly governs with the consent of the governed.

The principles written in the Constitution are secured by the character of the American people. President George Washington said in his first inaugural address: “The propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has ordained.” Values matter. Character counts.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan understand these great truths. They share a positive vision for America – a vision of America renewed and strong. They know America’s best days lay ahead. It will take honest results-oriented, conservative leadership to enact good policies for our people. They will provide it.

We respectfully submit this platform to the American people. It is both a vision of where we are headed and an invitation to join us in that journey. It is about the great dreams and opportunities that have always been America and must remain the essence of America for generations to come.

May God continue to shed his grace on the United States of America.

  • Governor Bob McDonnell, Chairman
  • Senator John Hoeven, Co-Chair
  • Congressman Marsha Blackburn, Co-Chair

Photobucket

Restoring the American Dream:Rebuilding the Economy and Creating Jobs:

We are the party of maximum economic freedom and the prosperity freedom makes possible. Prosperity is the product of self-discipline, work, savings, and investment by individual Americans, but it is not an end in itself. Prosperity provides the means by which individuals and families can maintain their independence from government, raise their children by their own values, practice their faith, and build communities of self-reliant neighbors. It is also the means by which the United States is able to assert global leadership. The vigor of our economy makes possible our military strength and is critical to our national security.

This year’s election is a chance to restore the proven values of the American free enterprise system. We offer our Republican vision of a free people using their God-given talents, combined with hard work, self-reliance, ethical conduct, and the pursuit of opportunity, to achieve great things for themselves and the greater community. Our vision of an opportunity society stands in stark contrast to the current Administration’s policies that expand entitlements and guarantees, create new public programs, and provide expensive government bailouts. That road has created a culture of dependency, bloated government, and massive debt.

Republicans believe in the Great American Dream, with its economics of inclusion, enabling everyone to have a chance to own, invest, build, and prosper. It is the opposite of the policies which, for the last three and a half years, have stifled growth, destroyed jobs, halted investment, created unprecedented uncertainty, and prolonged the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. Those policies have placed the federal government in the driver’s seat, rather than relying on energetic and entrepreneurial Americans to rebuild the economy from the ground up. Excessive taxation and regulation impede economic development. Lowering taxes promotes substantial economic growth and reducing regulation encourages business formation and job creation. Knowing that, a Republican President and Congress will jumpstart an economic renewal that creates opportunity, rewards work and saving, and unleashes the productive genius of the American people. Because the GOP is the Great Opportunity Party, this is our pledge to workers without jobs, families without savings, and neighborhoods without hope: together we can get our country back on track, expanding its bounty, renewing its faith, and fulfilling its promise of a better life.

Job Creation: Getting Americans Back to Work  (Top)

The best jobs program is economic growth. We do not offer yet another made-in-Washington package of subsidies and spending to create temporary or artificial jobs. We want much more than that. We want a roaring job market to match a roaring economy. Instead, what this Administration has given us is 42 consecutive months of unemployment above 8 percent, the longest period of high unemployment since the Great Depression. Republicans will pursue free market policies that are the surest way to boost employment and create job growth and economic prosperity for all.

In all the sections that follow, as well as elsewhere in this platform, we explain what must be done to achieve that goal. The tax system must be simplified. Government spending and regulation must be reined in. American companies must be more competitive in the world market, and we must be aggressive in promoting U.S. products abroad and securing open markets for them. A federal-State-private partnership must invest in the nation’s infrastructure: roads, bridges, airports, ports, and water systems, among others. Federal training programs have to be overhauled and made relevant for the workplace of the twenty-first century. Potential employers need certainty and predictability for their hiring decisions, and the team of a Republican President and Congress will create the confidence that will get Americans back to work.

Small Business and Entrepreneurship  (Top)

America’s small businesses are the backbone of the U.S. economy, employing tens of millions of workers. Small businesses create the vast majority of jobs, patents, and U.S. exporters. Under the current Administration, we have the lowest rate of business startups in thirty years. Small businesses are the leaders in the world’s advances in technology and innovation, and we pledge to strengthen that role and foster small business entrepreneurship.

While small businesses have significantly contributed to the nation’s economic growth, our government has failed to meet its small business goals year after year and failed to overcome burdensome regulatory, contracting, and capital barriers. This impedes their growth.

We will reform the tax code to allow businesses to generate enough capital to grow and create jobs for our families, friends and neighbors all across America. We will encourage investments in small businesses. We will create an environment where adequate financing and credit are available to spur manufacturing and expansion. We will serve as aggressive advocates for small businesses.

Tax Relief to Grow the Economy and Create Jobs  (Top)

Taxes, by their very nature, reduce a citizen’s freedom. Their proper role in a free society should be to fund services that are essential and authorized by the Constitution, such as national security, and the care of those who cannot care for themselves. We reject the use of taxation to redistribute income, fund unnecessary or ineffective programs, or foster the crony capitalism that corrupts both politicians and corporations.

Our goal is a tax system that is simple, transparent, flatter, and fair. In contrast, the current IRS code is like a patchwork quilt, stitched together over time from mismatched pieces, and is beyond the comprehension of the average citizen. A reformed code should promote simplicity and coherence, savings and innovation, increase American competitiveness, and recognize the burdens on families with children. To that end, we propose to:

Extend the 2001 and 2003 tax relief packages-commonly known as the Bush tax cuts-pending reform of the tax code, to keep tax rates from rising on income, interest, dividends, and capital gains;

Reform the tax code by reducing marginal tax rates by 20 percent across-the-board in a revenue-neutral manner; Eliminate the taxes on interest, dividends, and capital gains altogether for lower and middle-income taxpayers; End the Death Tax; and Repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax.

American Competitiveness in a Global Economy  (Top)

American businesses now face the world’s highest corporate tax rate. It reduces their worldwide competitiveness, encourages corporations to move overseas, lessens investment, cripples job creation, lowers U.S. wages, and fosters the avoidance of tax liability-without actually increasing tax revenues. To level the international playing field, and to spur job creation here at home, we call for a reduction of the corporate rate to keep U.S. corporations competitive internationally, with a permanent research and development tax credit, and a repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax. We also support the recommendation of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, as well as the current President’s Export Council, to switch to a territorial system of corporate taxation, so that profits earned and taxed abroad may be repatriated for job-creating investment here at home without additional penalty.

Fundamental Tax Principles  (Top)

We oppose retroactive taxation; and we condemn attempts by activist judges, at any level of government, to seize the power of the purse by ordering higher taxes. We oppose tax policies that divide Americans or promote class warfare.

Because of the vital role of religious organizations, charities, and fraternal benevolent societies in fostering benevolence and patriotism, they should not be subject to taxation, and donations to them should continue to be tax deductible.

In any restructuring of federal taxation, to guard against hypertaxation of the American people, any value added tax or national sales tax must be tied to the simultaneous repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment, which established the federal income tax.

Reining in Out-of-Control Spending, Balancing the Budget, and Ensuring Sound Monetary Policy  (Top)

The massive federal government is structurally and financially broken. For decades it has been pushed beyond its core functions, increasing spending to unsustainable levels. Elected officials have overpromised and overspent, and now the bills are due. Unless we take dramatic action now, young Americans and their children will inherit an unprecedented legacy of enormous and unsustainable debt, with the interest alone consuming an ever-increasing portion of the country’s wealth. The specter of national bankruptcy that now hangs over much of Europe is a warning to us as well. Over the last three and a half years, while cutting the defense budget, the current Administration has added an additional $5.3 trillion to the national debt-now approximately $16 trillion, the largest amount in U.S. history. In fiscal year 2011, spending reached $3.6 trillion, nearly a quarter of our gross domestic product. Adjusted for inflation, that’s more than three times its peak level in World War II, and almost half of every dollar spent was borrowed money. Three programs-Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security- account for over 40 percent of total spending. While these levels of spending and debt are already harming job creation and growth, projections of future spending growth are nothing short of catastrophic, both economically and socially. And those dire projections do not include the fiscal nightmare of Obamacare, with over $1 trillion in new taxes, multiple mandates, and a crushing price tag.

We can preempt the debt explosion. Backed by a Republican Senate and House, our next President will propose immediate reductions in federal spending, as a down payment on the much larger task of long-range fiscal control. We suggest a tripartite test for every federal activity. First, is it within the constitutional scope of the federal government? Second, is it effective and absolutely necessary? And third, is it sufficiently important to justify borrowing, especially foreign borrowing, to fund it? Against those standards we will measure programs from international population control to California’s federally subsidized high-speed train to nowhere, and terminate programs that don’t measure up.

Balancing the Budget  (Top)

Cutting spending is not enough; it must be accompanied by major structural reforms, increased productivity, use of technology, and long-term government downsizing that both reduce debt and deficits and ignite economic growth. We must restructure the twentieth century entitlement state so the missions of important programs can succeed in the twenty-first century. Medicare, in particular, is the largest driver of future debt. Our reform of healthcare will empower millions of seniors to control their personal healthcare decisions, unlike Obamacare that empowered a handful of bureaucrats to cut Medicare in ways that will deny care for the elderly. We must also change the budget process itself. From its beginning, its design has enabled, rather than restrained, reckless spending by giving procedural cover to Members of Congress. The budget process gave us the insidious term “tax expenditure,” which means that any earnings the government allows a taxpayer to keep through a deduction, exemption, or credit are equivalent to spending the same amount on some program. It also lumped a broad range of diverse programs under the heading of “entitlement,” as if veterans’ benefits and welfare checks belong in the same category. Far worse, the process assumes every spending program will be permanent and every tax cut will be temporary. It refuses to recognize the beneficial budgetary impact of lower tax rates, and it calls a spending increase a cut if it is less than the rate of inflation. Republican Members of Congress have repeatedly tried to reform the budget process to make it more transparent and accountable, in particular by voting for a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution, following the lead of 33 States which have put that restraint into their own constitutions. We call for a Constitutional amendment requiring a super-majority for any tax increase, with exceptions for only war and national emergencies, and imposing a cap limiting spending to the historical average percentage of GDP so that future Congresses cannot balance the budget by raising taxes.

Inflation and the Federal Reserve  (Top)

A sound monetary policy is critical for maintaining a strong economy. Inflation diminishes the purchasing power of the dollar at home and abroad and is a hidden tax on the American people. Moreover, the inflation tax is regressive, punishes those who save, transfers wealth from Main Street to Wall Street, and has grave implications for seniors living on fixed incomes.

Because the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy actions affect both inflation and economic activity, those actions should be transparent. Moreover, the Fed’s important role as a lender of last resort should also be carried out in a more transparent manner. A free society demands that the sun shine on all elements of government. Therefore, the Republican Party will work to advance substantive legislation that brings transparency and accountability to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Open Market Committee, and the Fed’s dealings with foreign central banks. The first step to increasing transparency and accountability is through an annual audit of the Federal Reserve’s activities. Such an audit would need to be carefully implemented so that the Federal Reserve remains insulated from political pressures and so its decisions are based on sound economic principles and sound money rather than on political pressures for easy money and loose credit.

Determined to crush the double-digit inflation that was part of the Carter Administration’s economic legacy, President Reagan, shortly after his inauguration, established a commission to consider the feasibility of a metallic basis for U.S. currency. The commission advised against such a move. Now, three decades later, as we face the task of cleaning up the wreckage of the current Administration’s policies, we propose a similar commission to investigate possible ways to set a fixed value for the dollar.

Ending the Housing Crisis and Expanding Opportunities for Homeownership  (Top)

Homeownership expands personal liberty, builds communities, and helps Americans create wealth. “The American Dream” is not a stale slogan. It is the lived reality that expresses the aspirations of all our people. It means a decent place to live, a safe place to raise kids, a welcoming place to retire. It bespeaks the quiet pride of those who work hard to shelter their family and, in the process, create caring neighborhoods. Homeownership is best fostered by a growing economy with low interest rates, as well as prudent regulation, financial education, and targeted assistance to responsible borrowers.

The collapse of the housing market over the last four years has been not only a severe blow to the entire economy, but also a personal tragedy to millions of Americans whose homes have lost value and to so many others who have lost their homes. Combined with high unemployment, that decline has left countless homeowners saddled with mortgages exceeding the value of their homes. The response of the current Administration has done little to improve, and much to worsen, the situation. By discouraging private sector investment, it has stalled the housing recovery. Its massive intervention in the housing market, with the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac backing nearly all new mortgages, has hit the taxpayers with a bill for almost $200 billion to bail out the latter two institutions. It has spent billions more on poorly designed and ineffective housing assistance programs. Making matters worse, the Congress, under Democrat control, enacted the Dodd-Frank Act, a massive labyrinth of costly new regulations that deter lenders from lending to creditworthy homebuyers and that disproportionately harms small and community banks. As a result, home sales remain weak, investment in housing remains depressed, construction industry jobs remain down, and mortgage lending has yet to recover to pre-crisis levels.

Rebuilding Homeownership  (Top)

We must establish a mortgage finance system based on competition and free enterprise that is transparent, encourages the private sector to return to housing, and promotes personal responsibility on the part of borrowers. Policies that promote reliance on private capital, like private mortgage insurance, will be critical to scaling back the federal role in the housing market and avoiding future taxpayer bailouts. Reforms should provide clear and prudent underwriting standards and guidelines on acceptable lending practices. Compliance with regulatory standards should provide a legal safe harbor to guard against opportunistic litigation. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were a primary cause of the housing crisis because their implicit government guarantee allowed them to avoid market discipline and make risky investments. Their favored political status enriched their politically-connected executives and their shareholders at the expense of the nation. Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be wound down in size and scope, and their officials should be held to account.

The FHA, tripled in size to more than $1 trillion under the current Administration, has crowded out the private sector and is at risk of requiring a taxpayer bailout. It must be downsized and limited to helping first-time homebuyers and low- and moderate- income borrowers. Taxpayer dollars should not be used to bail out borrowers and lenders by funding principal write-downs. While the federal government must prosecute mortgage fraud and other financial crimes, any settlements received thereby should be directed to individuals harmed by the misconduct, not diverted to pay for unrelated programs. FDIC insurance for bank depositors must be preserved. However, to correct for the moral hazard created by deposit insurance, banks should be well capitalized, which is the best insurance against future taxpayer bailouts.

The federal government has a role in housing by enforcing non-discrimination laws and assisting low-income families and the elderly with safe and adequate shelter, especially through the use of housing vouchers. Homeownership is an important goal, but public policy must be balanced to reflect the needs of Americans who choose to rent. A comprehensive housing policy should address the demand for apartments and multi-family housing. Any assistance should be subject to stringent oversight to ensure that funds are spent wisely.

Infrastructure: Building the Future  (Top)

America’s infrastructure networks are critical for economic growth, international competitiveness, and national security. Infrastructure programs have traditionally been non-partisan; everyone recognized that we all need clean water and safe roads, rail, bridges, ports, and airports. The current Administration has changed that, replacing civil engineering with social engineering as it pursues an exclusively urban vision of dense housing and government transit. In the vaunted stimulus package, less than six percent of the funds went to transportation, with most of that to cosmetic “shovel-ready” projects rather than fundamental structural improvements. All the while, the Democrats’ Davis-Bacon law continues to drive up infrastructure construction and maintenance costs for the benefit of that party’s union stalwarts. What most Americans take for granted-the safety and availability of our water supply-is in perilous condition. Engineering surveys report crumbling drinking water systems, aging dams, and overwhelmed wastewater infrastructure. Investment in these areas, as well as with levees and inland waterways, can renew communities, attract businesses, and create jobs. Most importantly, it can assure the health and safety of the American people.

The nation’s ports have become a bottleneck in international trade. America’s exporters sometimes use Canadian ports in order to reach the world market in a timely manner. With the widening of the Panama Canal, our East Coast and Gulf ports have an extraordinary opportunity to boost container traffic but require major improvement to remain competitive receivers of large vessels.

Interstate infrastructure has long been a federal responsibility shared with the States, and a renewed federal-State partnership and new public-private partnerships are urgently needed to maintain and modernize our country’s travel lifelines to facilitate economic growth and job creation. In the last two years, Congressional Republicans have taken the lead with initiatives like the FAA Modernization and Reform Act; the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act; and the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act. The recent highway bill reforming the federal highway program included some key reforms. It will shorten the project approval process, eliminate unnecessary programs, and give States more flexibility to address their particular needs. It is a return to the principles of federalism, and it contains not a single earmark. It should be followed by reform of the 42-year old National Environmental Policy Act to create regulatory certainty for infrastructure projects, expedite their timetables, and limit litigation against them.

Securing sufficient funding for the Highway Trust Fund remains a challenge given the debt and deficits and the need to reduce spending. Republicans will make hard choices and set priorities, and infrastructure will be among them. In some States with elected officials dominated by the Democratic Party, a proportion of highway funds is diverted to other purposes. This must stop. We oppose any funding mechanism that would involve governmental monitoring of every car and truck in the nation. Amtrak continues to be, for the taxpayers, an extremely expensive railroad. The public has to subsidize every ticket nearly $50. It is long past time for the federal government to get out of way and allow private ventures to provide passenger service to the northeast corridor. The same holds true with regard to high-speed and intercity rail across the country.

International Trade: More American Jobs, Higher Wages, and A Better Standard of Living  (Top)

International trade is crucial for our economy. It means more American jobs, higher wages, and a better standard of living. Every $1 billion in additional U.S. exports means another 5,000 jobs here at home. The Free Trade Agreements negotiated with friendly democracies since President Reagan’s trailblazing pact with Israel in 1985 facilitated the creation of nearly ten million jobs supported by our exports. That record makes all the more deplorable the current Administration’s slowness in completing agreements begun by its predecessor and its failure to pursue any new trade agreements with friendly nations.

This worldwide explosion of trade has had a downside, however, as some governments have used a variety of unfair means to limit American access to their markets while stealing our designs, patents, brands, know-how, and technology-the “intellectual property” that drives innovation. The chief offender is China, which has built up its economy in part by piggybacking onto Western technological advances, manipulates its currency to the disadvantage of American exporters, excludes American products from government purchases, subsidizes Chinese companies to give them a commercial advantage, and invents regulations and standards designed to keep out foreign competition. The current Administration’s way of dealing with all these violations of world trade standards has been a virtual surrender.

Republicans understand that you can succeed in a negotiation only if you are willing to walk away from it. Thus, a Republican President will insist on full parity in trade with China and stand ready to impose countervailing duties if China fails to amend its currency policies. Commercial discrimination will be met in kind. Counterfeit goods will be aggressively kept out of the country. Victimized private firms will be encouraged to raise claims in both U.S. courts and at the World Trade Organization. Punitive measures will be imposed on foreign firms that misappropriate American technology and intellectual property. Until China abides by the WTO’s Government Procurement Agreement, the United States government will end procurement of Chinese goods and services.

Because American workers have shown that, on a truly level playing field, they can surpass the competition in international trade, we call for the restoration of presidential Trade Promotion Authority. It will ensure up or down votes in Congress on any new trade agreements, without meddling by special interests. A Republican President will complete negotiations for a Trans-Pacific Partnership to open rapidly developing Asian markets to U.S. products. Beyond that, we envision a worldwide multilateral agreement among nations committed to the principles of open markets, what has been called a “Reagan Economic Zone,” in which free trade will truly be fair trade for all concerned.

A Twenty-First Century Workforce  (Top)

The greatest asset of the American economy is the hard-working American. The high rates of unemployment over the last three and a half years-disastrously high among youth, minorities, and veterans-have thus been a tragic waste of energy and ideas, compounded by the waste of billions in “stimulus” funds with no payoff in jobs. The chief cause has been an unprecedented uncertainty in the American free enterprise system due to the overreaching policies of the current Administration. Nothing matters more than getting the American people back to work. In addition to cutting spending, keeping taxes low, and curtailing bureaucratic red tape, we must replace outdated policies and ineffectual training programs with a plan to develop a twenty-first century workforce to make the most of our country’s human capital.

It is critical that the United States has a highly trained and skilled workforce. Nine federal agencies currently run 47 retraining programs at a total cost of $18 billion annually with dismal results. Both the trainees in those programs and the taxpayers who fund them deserve better. We propose consolidation of those programs into State block grants so that training can be coordinated with local schools and employers. That will be critically important if States establish Personal Reemployment Accounts, letting trainees direct resources in ways that will steer them toward long-term employment, especially through on-the-job training with participating employers. We can accelerate the process of restoring our domestic economy-and reclaiming this country’s traditional position of dominance in international trade-by a policy of strategic immigration, granting more work visas to holders of advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math from other nations. Highly educated immigrants can assist in creating new services and products. In the same way, foreign students who graduate from an American university with an advanced degree in science, technology, engineering or math should be encouraged to remain here and contribute to economic prosperity and job creation. Highly skilled, English-speaking, and integrated into their communities, they are too valuable a resource to lose. As in past generations, we should encourage the world’s innovators and inventors to create our common future and their permanent homes here in the United States.

Republicans believe that the employer-employee relationship of the future will be built upon employee empowerment and workplace flexibility, which is why Republicans support employee ownership. We believe employee stock ownership plans create capitalists and expand the ownership of private property and are therefore the essence of a high-performing free enterprise economy, which creates opportunity for those who work and honors those values that have made our nation so strong. Today’s workforce is independent, wants flexibility in working conditions, needs family-friendly options, and is most productive when allowed to innovate and rethink the status quo. The federal government should set an example in making those adaptations, especially in promoting portability in pension plans and health insurance.

Freedom in the Workplace  (Top)

The current Administration has chosen a different path with regard to labor, clinging to antiquated notions of confrontation and concentrating power in the Washington offices of union elites. It has strongly supported the anti-business card check legislation to deny workers a secret ballot in union organizing campaigns and, through the use of Project Labor Agreements, barred 80 percent of the construction workforce from competing for jobs in many stimulus projects. The current Administration has turned the National Labor Relations Board into a partisan advocate for Big Labor, using threats and coercion outside the law to attack businesses and, through “snap elections” and “micro unions,” limit the rights of workers and employers alike.

We will restore the rule of law to labor law by blocking “card check,” enacting the Secret Ballot Protection Act, enforcing the Hobbs Act against labor violence, and passing the Raise Act to allow all workers to receive well-earned raises without the approval of their union representative. We demand an end to the Project Labor Agreements; and we call for repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act, which costs the taxpayers billions of dollars annually in artificially high wages on government projects. We support the right of States to enact Right-to-Work laws and encourage them to do so to promote greater economic liberty. Ultimately, we support the enactment of a National Right-to-Work law to promote worker freedom and to promote greater economic liberty. We will aggressively enforce the recent decision by the Supreme Court barring the use of union dues for political purposes without the consent of the worker.

We salute the Republican Governors and State legislators who have saved their States from fiscal disaster by reforming their laws governing public employee unions. We urge elected officials across the country to follow their lead in order to avoid State and local defaults on their obligations and the collapse of services to the public. To safeguard the free choice of public employees, no government at any level should act as the dues collector for unions. A Republican President will protect the rights of conscience of public employees by proposing legislation to bar mandatory dues for political purposes.

Photobucket

We The People: A Restoration of Constitutional Government

We are the party of the Constitution, the solemn compact which confirms our God-given individual rights and assures that all Americans stand equal before the law. Perhaps the greatest political document ever written, it defines the purposes and limits of government and is the blueprint for ordered liberty that makes the U.S. the world’s freest, most stable, and most prosperous nation. Its Constitutional ideals have been emulated around the world, and with them has come unprecedented prosperity for billions of people.

In the spirit of the Constitution, we consider discrimination based on sex, race, age, religion, creed, disability, or national origin unacceptable and immoral. We will strongly enforce anti-discrimination statutes and ask all to join us in rejecting the forces of hatred and bigotry and in denouncing all who practice or promote racism, anti-Semitism, ethnic prejudice, or religious intolerance. We support efforts to help low-income individuals get a fair chance based on their potential and individual merit; but we reject preferences, quotas, and set-asides as the best or sole methods through which fairness can be achieved, whether in government, education, or corporate boardrooms. In a free society, the primary role of government is to protect the God-given, inalienable, inherent rights of its citizens, including the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Merit, ability, aptitude, and results should be the factors that determine advancement in our society.

The Republican Party includes Americans from every faith and tradition, and our policies and positions respect the right of every American to follow his or her beliefs and underscore our reverence for the religious freedom envisioned by the Founding Fathers of our nation and of our party. As a matter of principle, we oppose the creation of any new race-based governments within the United States.

A Restoration of Constitutional Order: Congress and the Executive  (Top)

We salute Republican Members of the House of Representatives for enshrining in the Rules of the House the requirement that every bill must cite the provision of the Constitution which permits its introduction. Their adherence to the Constitution stands in stark contrast to the antipathy toward the Constitution demonstrated by the current Administration and its Senate allies by appointing “czars” to evade the confirmation process, making unlawful “recess” appointments when the Senate is not in recess, using executive orders to bypass the separation of powers and its checks and balances, encouraging illegal actions by regulatory agencies from the NLRB to the EPA, openly and notoriously displaying contempt for Congress, the Judiciary, and the Constitutional prerogatives of the individual States, refusing to defend the nation’s laws in federal courts or enforce them on the streets, ignoring the legal requirement for legislative enactment of an annual budget, gutting welfare reform by unilaterally removing its statutory work requirement, buying senatorial votes with special favors, and evading the legal requirement for congressional consultation regarding troop commitments overseas. A Republican President and Republican Senate will join House Republicans in living by the rule of law, the foundation of the American Republic.

Protecting America is the first and most important duty of our federal government. The Constitution wisely distributes important roles in the area of national security to both the President and Congress. It empowers the President to serve as Commander in Chief, making him the lead instrument of the American people in matters of national security and foreign affairs. It also bestows authority on Congress, including the powers to declare war, regulate commerce, and authorize the funds needed to keep and protect our Nation. The United States of America is strongest when the President and Congress work closely together – in war and in peace – to advance our common interests and ideals. By uniting our government and our citizens, our foreign policy will secure freedom, keep America safe, and ensure that we remain the “last best hope on Earth.”

Defending Marriage Against An Activist Judiciary  (Top)

A serious threat to our country’s constitutional order, perhaps even more dangerous than presidential malfeasance, is an activist judiciary, in which some judges usurp the powers reserved to other branches of government. A blatant example has been the court-ordered redefinition of marriage in several States. This is more than a matter of warring legal concepts and ideals. It is an assault on the foundations of our society, challenging the institution which, for thousands of years in virtually every civilization, has been entrusted with the rearing of children and the transmission of cultural values.

A Sacred Contract: Defense of Marriage  (Top)

That is why Congressional Republicans took the lead in enacting the Defense of Marriage Act, affirming the right of States and the federal government not to recognize same-sex relationships licensed in other jurisdictions. The current Administration’s open defiance of this constitutional principle – in its handling of immigration cases, in federal personnel benefits, in allowing a same-sex marriage at a military base, and in refusing to defend DOMA in the courts – makes a mockery of the President’s inaugural oath. We commend the United States House of Representatives and State Attorneys General who have defended these laws when they have been attacked in the courts. We reaffirm our support for a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. We applaud the citizens of the majority of States which have enshrined in their constitutions the traditional concept of marriage, and we support the campaigns underway in several other States to do so.

Living Within Our Means: A Constitutional Budget  (Top)

Republican Members of Congress have repeatedly tried to reform the budget process to make it more transparent and accountable, in particular by voting for a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution, following the lead of 33 States which have put that restraint into their own constitutions. We call for a Constitutional amendment requiring a super-majority for any tax increase with exceptions for only war and national emergencies, and imposing a cap limiting spending to the historical average percentage of GDP so that future Congresses cannot balance the budget by raising taxes.

Federalism and The Tenth Amendment  (Top)

We support the review and examination of all federal agencies to eliminate wasteful spending, operational inefficiencies, or abuse of power to determine whether they are performing functions that are better performed by the States. These functions, as appropriate, should be returned to the States in accordance with the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We affirm that all legislation, rules, and regulations must conform and public servants must adhere to the U.S. Constitution, as originally intended by the Framers. Whether such legislation is a State or federal matter must be determined in accordance with the Tenth Amendment, in conjunction with Article I, Section 8. When the Constitution is evaded, transgressed, or ignored, so are the freedoms it guarantees. In that context, the elections of 2012 will be much more than a contest between parties. They are a referendum on the future of liberty in America.

The Republican Party, born in opposition to the denial of liberty, stands for the rights of individuals, families, faith communities, institutions – and of the States which are their instruments of self-government. In establishing a federal system of government, the Framers viewed the States as laboratories of democracy and centers of innovation, as do we. To maintain the integrity of their system, they bequeathed to successive generations an instrument by which we might correct any misalignment of power between our States and the federal government, the Tenth Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

In fidelity to that principle, we condemn the current Administration’s continued assaults on State governments in matters ranging from voter ID laws to immigration, from healthcare programs to land use decisions. Our States are the laboratories of democracy from which the people propel our nation forward, solving local and State problems through local and State innovations. We pledge to restore the proper balance between the federal government and the governments closest to, and most reflective of, the American people. Scores of entrenched federal programs violate the constitutional mandates of federalism by taking money from the States, laundering it through various federal agencies, only to return to the States shrunken grants with mandates attached. We propose wherever feasible to leave resources where they originate: in the homes and neighborhoods of the taxpayers. We call on the federal government to do a systematic analysis of laws and regulations to eliminate costly bureaucratic mandates on the States and the people. With every right comes a responsibility. A few States and their political subdivisions are currently in dire fiscal situations, largely because of their spending, debt, and failure to rein in public employee unions. In the event those conditions worsen, the federal government must not assume the State governments’ or their political subdivisions’ financial responsibility or require the nation’s taxpayers to pay for the misrule of a few State governments. Nor shall the States assume the federal government’s financial responsibility.

The Continuing Importance of Protecting the Electoral College  (Top)

We oppose the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact or any other scheme to abolish or distort the procedures of the Electoral College. We recognize that an unconstitutional effort to impose “national popular vote” would be a mortal threat to our federal system and a guarantee of corruption as every ballot box in every state would become a chance to steal the presidency.

Voter Integrity to Ensure Honest Elections  (Top)

Honest elections are the foundation of representative government. We support State efforts to ensure ballot access for the elderly, the handicapped, military personnel, and all authorized voters. For the same reason, we applaud legislation to require photo identification for voting and to prevent election fraud, particularly with regard to registration and absentee ballots. We support State laws that require proof of citizenship at the time of voter registration to protect our electoral system against a significant and growing form of voter fraud. Every time that a fraudulent vote is cast, it effectively cancels out a vote of a legitimate voter.

Voter fraud is political poison. It strikes at the heart of representative government. We call on every citizen, elected official, and member of the judiciary to preserve the integrity of the vote. We call for vigorous prosecution of voter fraud at the State and federal level. To do less disenfranchises present and future generations. We recognize that having a physical verification of the vote is the best way to ensure a fair election. “Let ambition counter ambition,” as James Madison said. When all parties have representatives observing the counting of ballots in a transparent process, integrity is assured. We strongly support the policy that all electronic voting systems have a voter verified paper audit trail.

States or political subdivisions that use all-mail elections cannot ensure the integrity of the ballot. When ballots are mailed to every registered voter, ballots can be stolen or fraudulently voted by unauthorized individuals because the system does not have a way to verify the identity of the voter. We call for States and political subdivisions to adopt voting systems that can verify the identity of the voter.

Military men and women must not be disenfranchised from the very freedom they defend. We affirm that our troops, wherever stationed, be allowed to vote and those votes be counted in the November election and in all elections. To that end, the entire chain of command, from President and the Secretary of Defense, to base and unit commanders – must ensure the timely receipt and return of all ballots and the utilization of electronic delivery of ballots where allowed by State law.

We support changing the way that the decennial census is conducted, so that citizens are distinguished from lawfully present aliens and illegal aliens. In order to preserve the principle of one-person, one-vote, the apportionment of representatives among the States should be according to the number of citizens.

The First Amendment: The Foresight of Our Founders to Protect Religious Freedom  (Top)

The first provision of the First Amendment concerns freedom of religion. That guarantee reflected Thomas Jefferson’s Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, which declared that no one should “suffer on account of his religious opinion or belief, but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinion in matters of religion….” That assurance has never been more needed than it is today, as liberal elites try to drive religious beliefs – and religious believers – out of the public square. The Founders of the American Republic universally agree that democracy presupposes a moral people and that, in the words of George Washington’s Farewell Address, “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”

The most offensive instance of this war on religion has been the current Administration’s attempt to compel faith-related institutions, as well as believing individuals, to contravene their deeply held religious, moral, or ethical beliefs regarding health services, traditional marriage, or abortion. This forcible secularization of religious and religiously affiliated organizations, including faith-based hospitals and colleges, has been in tandem with the current Administration’s audacity in declaring which faith-related activities are, or are not, protected by the First Amendment – an unprecedented aggression repudiated by a unanimous Supreme Court in its Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC decision. We pledge to respect the religious beliefs and rights of conscience of all Americans and to safeguard the independence of their institutions from government. We support the public display of the Ten Commandments as a reflection of our history and of our country’s Judeo-Christian heritage, and we affirm the right of students to engage in prayer at public school events in public schools and to have equal access to public schools and other public facilities to accommodate religious freedom in the public square. We assert every citizen’s right to apply religious values to public policy and the right of faith-based organizations to participate fully in public programs without renouncing their beliefs, removing religious symbols, or submitting to government-imposed hiring practices. We oppose government discrimination against businesses due to religious views. We support the First Amendment right of freedom of association of the Boy Scouts of America and other service organizations whose values are under assault and condemn the State blacklisting of religious groups which decline to arrange adoptions by same-sex couples. We condemn the hate campaigns, threats of violence, and vandalism by proponents of same-sex marriage against advocates of traditional marriage and call for a federal investigation into attempts to deny religious believers their civil rights.

The First Amendment: Speech that is Protected  (Top)

The rights of citizenship do not stop at the ballot box. They include the free speech right to devote one’s resources to whatever cause or candidate one supports. We oppose any restrictions or conditions that would discourage Americans from exercising their constitutional right to enter the political fray or limit their commitment to their ideals. As a result, we support repeal of the remaining sections of McCain- Feingold, support either raising or repealing contribution limits, and oppose passage of the DISCLOSE Act or any similar legislation designed to vitiate the Supreme Court’s recent decisions protecting political speech in Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. We insist that there should be no regulation of political speech on the Internet. By the same token, we oppose governmental censorship of speech through the so-called Fairness Doctrine or by government enforcement of speech codes, free speech zones, or other forms of “political correctness” on campus.

The Second Amendment: Our Right to Keep and Bear Arms  (Top)

We uphold the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, a right which antedated the Constitution and was solemnly confirmed by the Second Amendment. We acknowledge, support, and defend the law-abiding citizen’s God-given right of self-defense. We call for the protection of such fundamental individual rights recognized in the Supreme Court’s decisions in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago affirming that right, and we recognize the individual responsibility to safely use and store firearms. This also includes the right to obtain and store ammunition without registration. We support the fundamental right to self-defense wherever a law-abiding citizen has a legal right to be, and we support federal legislation that would expand the exercise of that right by allowing those with state-issued carry permits to carry firearms in any state that issues such permits to its own residents. Gun ownership is responsible citizenship, enabling Americans to defend their homes and communities. We condemn frivolous lawsuits against gun manufacturers and oppose federal licensing or registration of law-abiding gun owners. We oppose legislation that is intended to restrict our Second Amendment rights by limiting the capacity of clips or magazines or otherwise restoring the ill-considered Clinton gun ban. We condemn the reckless actions associated with the operation known as “Fast and Furious,” conducted by the Department of Justice, which resulted in the murder of a U.S. Border Patrol Agent and others on both sides of the border. We applaud the Members of the U.S. House of Representatives in holding the current Administration’s Attorney General in contempt of Congress for his refusal to cooperate with their investigation into that debacle. We oppose the improper collection of firearms sales information in the four southern border states, which was imposed without congressional authority.

The Fourth Amendment: Liberty and Privacy  (Top)

Affirming “the right of the people to be secure in their houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” we support pending legislation to prevent unwarranted or unreasonable governmental intrusion through the use of aerial surveillance or flyovers on U.S. soil, with the exception of patrolling our national borders. All security measures and police actions should be viewed through the lens of the Fourth Amendment; for if we trade liberty for security, we shall have neither.

The Fifth Amendment: Protecting Private Property  (Top)

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment- “nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation”-is a bulwark against tyranny; for without property rights, individual rights are diminished. That is why we deplore the Supreme Court’s Kelo v. New London decision, allowing local governments to seize a person’s home or land, not for vital public use, but for transfer to private developers. We call on State legislatures to moot the impact of the Kelo decision in their States by appropriate legislation or constitutional amendments. Equally important, we pledge to enforce the Takings Clause in the actions of federal agencies to ensure just compensation whenever private property is needed to achieve a compelling public use. This includes the taking of property in the form of water rights in the West and elsewhere and the taking of property by environmental regulations that destroy its value.

The Ninth Amendment: Affirming the People’s Rights  (Top)

This speaks most eloquently for itself: “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” This provision codifies the concept that our government derives its power from the people and all powers not delegated to the government are retained by the people. This is an essential feature of our governmental system, and we therefore celebrate the grassroots rediscovery of this and other constitutional guarantees over the last four years and welcome to our ranks all our fellow citizens who are determined to reclaim the rights of the people that have been ignored or violated by government.

The Sanctity and Dignity of Human Life  (Top)

Faithful to the “self-evident” truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children. We oppose using public revenues to promote or perform abortion or fund organizations which perform or advocate it and will not fund or subsidize health care which includes abortion coverage. We support the appointment of judges who respect traditional family values and the sanctity of innocent human life. We oppose the non-consensual withholding or withdrawal of care or treatment, including food and water, from people with disabilities, including newborns, as well as the elderly and infirm, just as we oppose active and passive euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Republican leadership has led the effort to prohibit the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion and permitted States to extend health care coverage to children before birth. We urge Congress to strengthen the Born Alive Infant Protection Act by enacting appropriate civil and criminal penalties on healthcare providers who fail to provide treatment and care to an infant who survives an abortion, including early induction delivery where the death of the infant is intended. We call for legislation to ban sex-selective abortions – gender discrimination in its most lethal form – and to protect from abortion unborn children who are capable of feeling pain; and we applaud U.S. House Republicans for leading the effort to protect the lives of pain-capable unborn children in the District of Columbia. We call for a ban on the use of body parts from aborted fetuses for research. We support and applaud adult stem cell research to develop lifesaving therapies, and we oppose the killing of embryos for their stem cells. We oppose federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

We also salute the many States that have passed laws for informed consent, mandatory waiting periods prior to an abortion, and health-protective clinic regulation. We seek to protect young girls from exploitation through a parental consent requirement; and we affirm our moral obligation to assist, rather than penalize, women challenged by an unplanned pregnancy. We salute those who provide them with counseling and adoption alternatives and empower them to choose life, and we take comfort in the tremendous increase in adoptions that has followed Republican legislative initiatives.

Respect for Our Flag: Symbol of the Constitution  (Top)

The symbol of our constitutional unity, to which we all pledge allegiance, is the flag of the United States of America. By whatever legislative method is most feasible, Old Glory should be given legal protection against desecration. We condemn decisions by activist judges to deny children the opportunity to say the Pledge of Allegiance in its entirety, including “Under God,” in public schools and encourage States to promote the pledge. We condemn the actions of those who deny our children the means by which to show respect for our great country and the constitutional principles represented by our flag.

American Sovereignty in U.S. Courts  (Top)

Subjecting American citizens to foreign laws is inimical to the spirit of the Constitution. It is one reason we oppose U.S. participation in the International Criminal Court. There must be no use of foreign law by U.S. courts in interpreting our Constitution and laws. Nor should foreign sources of law be used in State courts’ adjudication of criminal or civil matters.

The Lacey Act of 1900, designed to protect endangered wildlife in interstate commerce, is now applied worldwide, making it a crime to use, in our domestic industries, any product illegally obtained in the country of origin, whether or not the user had anything to do with its harvesting. This unreasonable extension of the Act not only hurts American businesses and American jobs, but also subordinates our own rule of law to the legal codes of 195 other governments. It must be changed.

Just as George Washington wisely warned America to avoid foreign entanglements and enter into only temporary alliances, we oppose the adoption or ratification of international treaties that weaken or encroach upon American sovereignty.

Photobucket

America’s Natural Resources: Energy, Agriculture and the Environment

We are the party of sustainable jobs and economic growth – through American energy, agriculture, and environmental policy. We are also the party of America’s growers and producers, farmers, ranchers, foresters, miners, and all those who bring from the earth the minerals and energy that are the lifeblood of our nation’s historically strong economy. We are as well the party of traditional conservation: the wise development of resources that keeps in mind both the sacrifices of past generations to secure that bounty and our responsibility to preserve it for future generations.

Domestic Energy Independence: An “All of the Above” Energy Policy  (Top)

The Republican Party is committed to domestic energy independence. The United States and its neighbors to the North and South have been blessed with abundant energy resources, tapped and untapped, traditional and alternative, that are among the largest and most valuable on earth. Advancing technology has given us a more accurate understanding of the nation’s enormous reserves that are ours for the development. The role of public officials must be to encourage responsible development across the board. Unlike the current Administration, we will not pick winners and losers in the energy marketplace. Instead, we will let the free market and the public’s preferences determine the industry outcomes. In assessing the various sources of potential energy, Republicans advocate an all-of-the-above diversified approach, taking advantage of all our American God-given resources. That is the best way to advance North American energy independence.

Our policies aim at energy security to ensure an affordable, stable, and reliable energy supply for all parts of the country and all sectors of the economy. Energy security is intimately linked to national security both in terms of our current dependence upon foreign supplies and because some of the hundreds of billions of dollars we pay for foreign oil ends up in the hands of terrorist groups that wish to harm us. A growing, prosperous economy and our standard of living and quality of life, moreover, depend on affordable and abundant domestic energy supplies.

A strong and stable energy sector is a job generator and a catalyst of economic growth, not only in the labor-intensive energy industry but also in its secondary markets. The Republican Party will encourage and ensure diversified domestic sources of energy, from research and development, exploration, production, transportation, transmission, and consumption in a way that is economically viable and job-producing, as well as environmentally sound. When our energy industry is revitalized, millions more Americans will find work in manufacturing, food production, metals, minerals, packaging, transportation and other fields – because of the jobs that will be created in, and as a result of, the energy sector. We are determined to create jobs, spur economic growth, lower energy prices, and strengthen our energy industry.

Our Nation’s Energy Abundance  (Top)

Coal is a low-cost and abundant energy source with hundreds of years of supply. We look toward the private sector’s development of new, state-of-the-art coal-fired plants that will be low-cost, environmentally responsible, and efficient. We also encourage research and development of advanced technologies in this sector, including coal-to-liquid, coal gasification, and related technologies for enhanced oil recovery.

The current Administration – with a President who publicly threatened to bankrupt anyone who builds a coal-powered plant – seems determined to shut down coal production in the United States, even though there is no cost-effective substitute for it or for the hundreds of thousands of jobs that go with it as the nation’s largest source of electricity generation. We will end the EPA’s war on coal and encourage the increased safe development in all regions of the nation’s coal resources, the jobs it produces, and the affordable, reliable energy that it provides for America. Further, we oppose any and all cap and trade legislation.

All estimates of America’s oil and natural gas reserves indicate an incredible bounty for the use of many generations to come. At a time when unemployment has been above 8 percent for 42 consecutive months, the longest stretch since the Great Depression, and some 23 million Americans are either unemployed, underemployed, or have given up on finding work, we should be pursuing our oil and gas resources both on and offshore. It is nonsensical to spurn real job creation by putting almost all of our coastal waters off limits to energy exploration, while urging other nations to explore their coasts. We call for a reasoned approach to all offshore energy development on the East Coast and other appropriate waters, and support the right of States to a reasonable share of the resulting revenue and royalties. We support opening the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) for energy exploration and development and ending the current Administration’s moratorium on permitting; opening the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for exploration and production of oil and natural gas; and allowing for more oil and natural gas exploration on federally owned and controlled land. We support this development in accordance with applicable environmental, health and safety laws, and regulations.

The current President personally blocked one of the most important energy and jobs projects in years. The Keystone XL Pipeline – which would have brought much needed Canadian and American oil to U.S. refineries – would create thousands of jobs. The current President’s job-killing combination of extremism and ineptitude threatens to create a permanent energy shortage. We are committed to approving the Keystone XL Pipeline and to streamlining permitting for the development of other oil and natural gas pipelines. Nuclear energy, now generating about 20 percent of our electricity through 104 power plants, must be expanded. No new nuclear generating plants have been licensed and constructed for thirty years. We call for timely processing of new reactor applications currently pending at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The federal government’s failure to address the storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel has left huge bills for States and taxpayers. Our country needs a more proactive approach to managing spent nuclear fuel, including through developing advanced reprocessing technologies.

We encourage the cost-effective development of renewable energy, but the taxpayers should not serve as venture capitalists for risky endeavors. It is important to create a pathway toward a market-based approach for renewable energy sources and to aggressively develop alternative sources for electricity generation such as wind, hydro, solar, biomass, geothermal, and tidal energy. Partnerships between traditional energy industries and emerging renewable industries can be a central component in meeting the nation’s long-term needs. Alternative forms of energy are part of our action agenda to power the homes and workplaces of the nation.

Pulling the Plug on American Energy Independence: The Failure of the Current Administration  (Top)

The current Administration has used taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers in the energy sector while publicly threatening to bankrupt anyone who builds a new coal-fired plant and has stopped the Keystone XL Pipeline. The current President has done nothing to disavow the scare campaign against hydraulic fracturing. Furthermore, he has wasted billions of taxpayers’ dollars by subsidizing favored companies like Solyndra, which generated bankruptcies rather than kilowatts.

Since the current President took office in 2009, consumers pay approximately twice as much for gas at the pump. Our common theme is to promote development of all forms of energy, enable consumer choice to keep energy costs low, and ensure that America remains competitive in the global marketplace. We will respect the States’ proven ability to regulate the use of hydraulic fracturing, continue development of oil and gas resources in places like the Bakken formation and Marcellus Shale, and review the environmental laws that often thwart new energy exploration and production. We salute the Republican Members of the House of Representatives for passing the Domestic Energy and Jobs Act, a vital piece of pro-growth legislation now introduced by Republicans in the Senate.

Agriculture  (Top)

Abundant Harvests: Protecting Our Farmers

Agricultural production and agricultural exports are a fundamental part of the U.S. economy, and the vigor of U.S. agriculture is central to our agenda for jobs, growth, and prosperity. Our farmers and ranchers are responsible for millions of jobs and for generating a trade surplus of more than $137 billion annually. Our producers provide America with abundant food, export food to hungry people around the world, and create a positive trade balance. Because of their care for the land, the United States does not depend on foreign imports for sustenance the way we depend on others for much of our energy. However, Americans are concerned about the increasing cost of their food under the current Administration policies that restrict energy production and raise costs for producers due to increased regulation. Our dependence on foreign imports of fertilizer could threaten our food supply, and we support the development of domestic production of fertilizer. The success of our system of risk management policies will enable farmers and ranchers to continue to feed and fuel the nation and much of the world.

Restoring Economic Stability for Our Farmers

Uncertainty is threatening the survival of our nation’s farmers. America’s growers and farmers are aging and much of America’s farmland will be passed to the next generation of farmers with families. Uncertainties in estate and capital gains tax laws threaten the survival of multigenerational family farms. The proposals for tax reforms contained elsewhere in this document will make certain that family farms will not be lost.

The Proper Federal Role in Agriculture

Agricultural producers and the jobs they generate throughout the entire food chain must confront volatility in both the weather and the markets. We support farm programs that enable them to manage the extraordinary risk they meet in the fields every year. These programs should be as cost-effective as they are functional, offering risk management tools that improve producers’ ability to operate when times are tough.

Just as all other federal programs must contribute to the deficit reduction necessary to put our country back on a sound fiscal footing, so must farm programs contribute to balancing the budget.

Programs like the Direct Payment program should end in favor of those, like crop insurance, that help manage risk and are counter-cyclical in nature. We support the historic role of the USDA in agricultural research that has transformed farming here and around the world. Because food safety is a major concern of the American people, we urge Congress to ensure adequate resources for the Department’s responsibilities in that regard.

The U. S. Forest Service controls about 193 million acres of land and employs 30,000 workers. The Forest Service should be charged to use these resources to the best economic potential for the nation. We must limit injunctions by activist judges regarding environmental management. In order to secure one of the country’s most important natural resources, we will review the way the Forest Service handles wildfires. This summer’s lack of rainfall over much of agricultural America highlights the importance of access to water for farmers and ranchers alike. We stand with growers and producers in defense of their water rights against attempts by the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers to expand jurisdiction over water, including water that is clearly not navigable.

The productivity of America’s farmers makes possible the generosity of U.S. food aid efforts around the world. These programs are fragmented between the Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Agency for International Development. They should be streamlined into one agency with a concentration on reducing overhead to maximize delivery of the actual goods.

The food stamp program now accounts for nearly 80 percent of the entire USDA budget. In finding ways to fight fraud and abuse, the Congress should consider block-granting that program to the States, along with the other domestic nutrition programs.

Protecting Our Environment  (Top)

The environment is getting cleaner and healthier. The nation’s air and waterways, as a whole, are much healthier than they were just a few decades ago. Efforts to reduce pollution, encourage recycling, educate the public, and avoid ecological degradation have been a success. To ensure their continued support by the American people, however, we need a dramatic change in the attitude of officials in Washington, a shift from a job-killing punitive mentality to a spirit of cooperation with producers, landowners, and the public. An important factor is full transparency in development of the data and modeling that drive regulations. Legislation to restore the authority of States in environmental protection is essential. We encourage the use of agricultural best management practices among the States to reduce pollution.

Our Republican Party’s Commitment to Conservation  (Top)

Conservation is a conservative value. As the pioneer of conservation over a century ago, the Republican Party believes in the moral obligation of the people to be good stewards of the God-given natural beauty and resources of our country and bases environmental policy on several common-sense principles. For example, we believe people are the most valuable resource, and human health and safety are the most important measurements of success. A policy protecting these objectives, however, must balance economic development and private property rights in the short run with conservation goals over the long run. Also, public access to public lands for recreational activities such as hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting should be permitted on all appropriate federal lands.

Moreover, the advance of science and technology advances environmentalism as well. Science allows us to weigh the costs and benefits of a policy so that we can prudently deal with our resources. This is especially important when the causes and long-range effects of a phenomenon are uncertain. We must restore scientific integrity to our public research institutions and remove political incentives from publicly funded research.

Private Stewardship of the Environment  (Top)

Experience has shown that, in caring for the land and water, private ownership has been our best guarantee of conscientious stewardship, while the worst instances of environmental degradation have occurred under government control. By the same token, the most economically advanced countries – those that respect and protect private property rights – also have the strongest environmental protections, because their economic progress makes possible the conservation of natural resources. In this context, Congress should reconsider whether parts of the federal government’s enormous landholdings and control of water in the West could be better used for ranching, mining, or forestry through private ownership. Timber is a renewable natural resource, which provides jobs to thousands of Americans. All efforts should be made to make federal lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service available for harvesting. The enduring truth is that people best protect what they own.

It makes sense that those closest to a situation are best able to determine its remedy. That is why a site- and situation-specific approach to an environmental problem is more likely to solve it, instead of a national rule based on the ideological concerns of politicized central planning. We therefore endorse legislation to require congressional approval before any rule projected to cost in excess of $100 million to American consumers can go into effect.

The Republican Party supports appointing public officials to federal agencies who will properly and correctly apply environmental laws and regulations, always in support of economic development, job creation, and American prosperity and leadership. Federal agencies charged with enforcing environmental laws must stop regulating beyond their authority. There is no place in regulatory agencies for activist regulators.

Reining in the EPA  (Top)

Since 2009, the EPA has moved forward with expansive regulations that will impose tens of billions of dollars in new costs on American businesses and consumers. Many of these new rules are creating regulatory uncertainty, preventing new projects from going forward, discouraging new investment, and stifling job creation.

We demand an end to the EPA’s participation in “sue and settle” lawsuits, sweetheart litigation brought by environmental groups to expand the Agency’s regulatory activities against the wishes of Congress and the public. We will require full transparency in litigation under the nation’s environmental laws, including advance notice to all State and local governments, tribes, businesses, landowners, and the public who could be adversely affected. We likewise support pending legislation to ensure cumulative analysis of EPA regulations, and to require full transparency in all EPA decisions, so that the public will know in advance their full impact on jobs and the economy. We oppose the EPA’s unwarranted revocation of existing permits. We also call on Congress to take quick action to prohibit the EPA from moving forward with new greenhouse gas regulations that will harm the nation’s economy and threaten millions of jobs over the next quarter century. The most powerful environmental policy is liberty, the central organizing principle of the American Republic and its people. Liberty alone fosters scientific inquiry, technological innovation, entrepreneurship, and information exchange. Liberty must remain the core energy behind America’s environmental improvement.

Photobucket

Reforming Government to Serve the People

We are the party of government reform. At a time when the federal government has become bloated, antiquated and unresponsive to taxpayers, it is our intention not only to improve management and provide better services, but also to rethink and restructure government to bring it into the twenty-first century. Government reform requires constant vigilance and effort because government by its nature tends to expand in both size and scope. Our goal is not just less spending in Washington but something far more important for the future of our nation: protecting the constitutional rights of citizens, sustainable prosperity, and strengthening the American family.

It isn’t enough to merely downsize government, having a smaller version of the same failed systems. We must do things in a dramatically different way by reversing the undermining of federalism and the centralizing of power in Washington. We look to the example set by Republican Governors and legislators all across the nation. Their leadership in reforming and reengineering government closest to the people vindicates the role of the States as the laboratories of democracy.

Our approach, like theirs, is two-fold. We look to government – local, State, and federal – for the things government must do, but we believe those duties can be carried out more efficiently and at less cost. For all other activities, we look to the private sector; for the American people’s resourcefulness, productivity, innovation, fiscal responsibility, and citizen-leadership have always been the true foundation of our national greatness.

For much of the last century, an opposing view has dominated public policy where we have witnessed the expansion, centralization, and bureaucracy in an entitlement society. Government has lumbered on, stifling innovation, with no incentive for fundamental change, through antiquated programs begun generations ago and now ill-suited to present needs and future requirements. As a result, today’s taxpayers – and future generations – face massive indebtedness, while Congressional Democrats and the current Administration block every attempt to turn things around. This man-made log-jam – the so-called stalemate in Washington – particularly affects the government’s three largest programs, which have become central to the lives of untold millions of Americans: Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.

Saving Medicare for Future Generations  (Top)

The Republican Party is committed to saving Medicare and Medicaid. Unless the programs’ fiscal ship is righted, the individuals hurt the first and the worst will be those who depend on them the most. We will save Medicare by modernizing it, by empowering its participants, and by putting it on a secure financial footing. This will be an enormous undertaking, and it should be a non-partisan one. We welcome to the effort all who sincerely want to ensure the future for our seniors and the poor. Republicans are determined to achieve that goal with a candid and honest presentation of the problem and its solutions to the American people.

Despite the enormous differences between Medicare and Medicaid, the two programs share the same fiscal outlook: their current courses cannot be sustained. Medicare has grown from more than 20 million enrolled in 1970 to more than 47 million enrolled today, with a projected total of 80 million in 2030. Medicaid counted almost 30 million enrollees in 1990, has about 54 million now, and under Obamacare would include an additional 11 million. Medicare spent more than $520 billion in 2010 and has close to $37 trillion in unfunded obligations, while total Medicaid spending will more than double by 2019. In many States, Medicaid’s mandates and inflexible bureaucracy have become a budgetary black hole, growing faster than most other budget lines and devouring funding for many other essential governmental functions.

The problem goes beyond finances. Poor quality healthcare is the most expensive type of care because it prolongs affliction and leads to ever more complications. Even expensive prevention is preferable to more costly treatment later on. When approximately 80 percent of healthcare costs are related to lifestyle -smoking, obesity, substance abuse-far greater emphasis has to be put upon personal responsibility for health maintenance. Our goal for both Medicare and Medicaid must be to assure that every participant receives the amount of care they need at the time they need it, whether for an expectant mother and her baby or for someone in the last moments of life. Absent reforms, these two programs are headed for bankruptcy that will endanger care for seniors and the poor.

The first step is to move the two programs away from their current unsustainable defined-benefit entitlement model to a fiscally sound defined-contribution model. This is the only way to limit costs and restore consumer choice for patients and introduce competition; for in healthcare, as in any other sector of the economy, genuine competition is the best guarantee of better care at lower cost. It is also the best guard against the fraud and abuse that have plagued Medicare in its isolation from free market forces, which in turn costs the taxpayers billions of dollars every year. We can do this without making any changes for those 55 and older. While retaining the option of traditional Medicare in competition with private plans, we call for a transition to a premium-support model for Medicare, with an income-adjusted contribution toward a health plan of the enrollee’s choice. This model will include private health insurance plans that provide catastrophic protection, to ensure the continuation of doctor-patient relationships. Without disadvantaging retirees or those nearing retirement, the age eligibility for Medicare must be made more realistic in terms of today’s longer life span.

Strengthening Medicaid in the States  (Top)

Medicaid, as the dominant payer in the health market in regards to long-term care, births, and individuals with mental illness, is the next frontier of welfare reform. It is simply too big and too flawed to be managed in its current condition from Washington. Republican Governors have taken the lead in proposing a host of regulatory changes that could make the program more flexible, innovative, and accountable. There should be alternatives to hospitalization for chronic health problems. Patients could be rewarded for participating in disease prevention activities. Excessive mandates on coverage should be eliminated. Patients with long-term care needs might fare better in a separately designed program.

As those and other specific proposals show, Republican Governors and State legislatures are ready to do the hard work of modernizing Medicaid for the twenty-first century. We propose to let them do all that and more by block-granting the program to the States, providing the States with the flexibility to design programs that meet the needs of their low income citizens. Such reforms could be achieved through premium supports or a refundable tax credit, allowing non-disabled adults and children to be moved into private health insurance of their choice, where their needs can be met on the same basis as those of more affluent Americans. For the aged and disabled under Medicaid, for whom monthly costs can be extremely high, States would have flexibility to improve the quality of care and to avoid the inappropriate institutional placing of patients who prefer to be cared for at home.

Security For Those Who Need It: Ensuring Retirement Security  (Top)

While no changes should adversely affect any current or near-retiree, comprehensive reform should address our society’s remarkable medical advances in longevity and allow younger workers the option of creating their own personal investment accounts as supplements to the system. Younger Americans have lost all faith in the Social Security system, which is understandable when they read the non- partisan actuary’s reports about its future funding status. Born in an old industrial era beyond the memory of most Americans, it is long overdue for major change, not just another legislative stopgap that postpones a day of reckoning. To restore public trust in the system, Republicans are committed to setting it on a sound fiscal basis that will give workers control over, and a sound return on, their investments. The sooner we act, the sooner those close to retirement can be reassured of their benefits and younger workers can take responsibility for planning their own retirement decades from now.

Unlike Social Security, the problems facing private pension plans are both demographic and ethical. While pension law may be complicated, the current bottom line is that many plans are increasingly underfunded by overestimating their rates of return on investments. This in turn endangers the integrity of the Pension Guaranty Benefit Corporation, which is itself seriously underfunded. In both cases, the taxpayers will be expected to pay for a bailout. As the first step toward possible corrective action, we call for a presidential panel to review the private pension system in this country of only those private pensions that are backed by the Pension Guaranty Benefit Corporation and to make public its findings.

The situation of public pension systems demands immediate remedial action. The irresponsible promises of politicians at every level of government have come back to haunt today’s taxpayers with enormous unfunded pension liabilities. Many cities face bankruptcy because of excessive outlays for early retirement, extravagant health plans, and overly generous pension benefits. We salute the Republican Governors and State legislators who have, in the face of abuse and threats of violence, reformed their State pension systems for the benefit of both taxpayers and retirees alike.

Regulatory Reform: The Key to Economic Growth  (Top)

The proper purpose of regulation is to set forth clear rules of the road for the citizens, so that business owners and workers can understand in advance what they need to do, or not do, to augment the possibilities for success within the confines of the law. Regulations must be drafted and implemented to balance legitimate public safety or consumer protection goals and job creation. Constructive regulation should be a helpful guide, not a punitive threat. Worst of all, over-regulation is a stealth tax on everyone as the costs of compliance with the whims of federal agencies are passed along to the consumers at the cost of $1.75 trillion a year. Many regulations are necessary, like those which ensure the safety of food and medicine, especially from overseas. But no peril justifies the regulatory impact of Obamacare on the practice of medicine, the Dodd-Frank Act on financial services, or the EPA’s and OSHA’s overreaching regulation agenda. A Republican Congress and President will repeal the first and second, and rein in the third. We support a sunset requirement to force reconsideration of out-of-date regulations, and we endorse pending legislation to require congressional approval for all new major and costly regulations.

The bottom line on regulations is jobs. In listening to America, one constant we have heard is the job-crippling effect of even well-intentioned regulation. That makes it all the more important for federal agencies to be judicious about the impositions they create on businesses, especially small businesses. We call for a moratorium on the development of any new major and costly regulations until a Republican Administration reviews existing rules to ensure that they have a sound basis in science and will be cost-effective.

Protecting Internet Freedom  (Top)

The Internet has unleashed innovation, enabled growth, and inspired freedom more rapidly and extensively than any other technological advance in human history. Its independence is its power. The Internet offers a communications system uniquely free from government intervention. We will remove regulatory barriers that protect outdated technologies and business plans from innovation and competition, while preventing legacy regulation from interfering with new and disruptive technologies such as mobile delivery of voice video data as they become crucial components of the Internet ecosystem. We will resist any effort to shift control away from the successful multi-stakeholder approach of Internet governance and toward governance by international or other intergovernmental organizations. We will ensure that personal data receives full constitutional protection from government overreach and that individuals retain the right to control the use of their data by third parties; the only way to safeguard or improve these systems is through the private sector.

A Vision for the Twenty-First Century: Technology, Telecommunications and the Internet  (Top)

The most vibrant sector of the American economy, indeed, one-sixth of it, is regulated by the federal government on precedents from the nineteenth century. Today’s technology and telecommunications industries are overseen by the Federal Communications Commission, established in 1934 and given the jurisdiction over telecommunications formerly assigned to the Interstate Commerce Commission, which had been created in 1887 to regulate the railroads. This is not a good fit. Indeed, the development of telecommunications advances so rapidly that even the Telecom Act of 1996 is woefully out of date. An industry that invested $66 billion in 2011 alone needs, and deserves, a more modern relationship with the federal government for the benefit of consumers here and worldwide.

The current Administration has been frozen in the past. It has conducted no auction of spectrum, has offered no incentives for investment, and, through the FCC’s net neutrality rule, is trying to micromanage telecom as if it were a railroad network. It inherited from the previous Republican Administration 95 percent coverage of the nation with broadband. It will leave office with no progress toward the goal of universal coverage – after spending $7.2 billion more. That hurts rural America, where farmers, ranchers, and small business manufacturers need connectivity to expand their customer base and operate in real time with the world’s producers. We encourage public-private partnerships to provide predictable support for connecting rural areas so that every American can fully participate in the global economy.

We call for an inventory of federal agency spectrum to determine the surplus that could be auctioned for the taxpayers’ benefit. With special recognition of the role university technology centers are playing in attracting private investment to the field, we will replace the administration’s Luddite approach to technological progress with a regulatory partnership that will keep this country the world leader in technology and telecommunications.

Protecting the Taxpayers: No More “Too Big to Fail”  (Top)

For more than a century, the U.S. was the world leader in financial services. The visionary management of capital was the lifeblood of the entire economy. By giving responsible access to credit, it helped small businesses grow, created jobs, and made Americans the best-housed people in history. By funding innovation, financial services underwrote our future. Then came the financial collapse of 2008 and a critical reassessment of the role and condition of financial institutions – most of which, it must be said, were responsible and healthy, especially those closest to their investors and borrowers.

In cases of malfeasance or other criminal behavior, the full force of the law should be used. But in all cases, this rule must apply: No financial institution is too big to fail. The taxpayers must never again be on the hook for the losses of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The public must never again be left holding the bag for Wall Street giants, which is why we decry the current Administration’s record of over-regulation and selective intervention, which has already frozen investment and job creation and threatens to make financial institutions the coddled wards of government.

A far better approach – protecting consumers and taxpayers alike – is institutional transparency. Banks need to know that they could be at risk, and investors need clear rules that are not subject to political meddling. The same holds true for the equity market regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. We propose reasonable federal oversight of financial institutions, practical safeguards for consumers, and – what is crucial for this country’s economic rebound – sound spending, tax, and regulatory policies that will allow those institutions to once again become the builders of the next American century. We strongly support tax reform; in the event we do not achieve this, we must preserve the mortgage interest deduction.

Judicial Activism: A Threat to the U.S. Constitution  (Top)

Despite improvements as a result of Republican nominations to the judiciary, some judges in the federal courts remain far afield from their constitutional limitations. The U.S. Constitution is the law of the land. Judicial activism which includes reliance on foreign law or unratified treaties undermines American law. The sole solution, apart from impeachment, is the appointment of constitutionalist jurists, who will interpret the law as it was originally intended rather than make it. That is both a presidential responsibility, in selecting judicial candidates, and a senatorial responsibility, in confirming them. We urge Republican Senators to do all in their power to prevent the elevation of additional leftist ideologues to the courts, particularly in the waning days of the current Administration. In addition to appointing activist judges, the current Administration has included an activist and highly partisan Department of Justice. With a Republican Administration, the Department will stop suing States for exercising those powers reserved to the States, will stop abusing its preclearance authority to block photo-ID voting laws, and will fulfill its responsibility to defend all federal laws in court, including the Defense of Marriage Act.

Restructuring the U.S. Postal Service for the Twenty-First Century  (Top)

The dire financial circumstances of the Postal Service require dramatic restructuring. In a world of rapidly advancing telecommunications, mail delivery from the era of the Pony Express cannot long survive. We call on Congress to restructure the Service to ensure the continuance of its essential function of delivering mail while preparing for the downsizing made inevitable by the advance of internet communication. In light of the Postal Service’s seriously underfunded pension system, Congress should explore a greater role for private enterprise in appropriate aspects of the mail-processing system.

Protecting Travelers and their Rights: Reforming the TSA for Security and Privacy  (Top)

While the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks brought about a greater need for homeland security, the American people have already delivered their verdict on the Transportation Security Administration: its procedures – and much of its personnel – need to be changed. It is now a massive bureaucracy of 65,000 employees who seem to be accountable to no one for the way they treat travelers. We call for the private sector to take over airport screening wherever feasible and look toward the development of security systems that can replace the personal violation of frisking.

The Rule of Law: Legal Immigration  (Top)

The greatest asset of the American economy is the American worker. Just as immigrant labor helped build our country in the past, today’s legal immigrants are making vital contributions in every aspect of our national life. Their industry and commitment to American values strengthens our economy, enriches our culture, and enables us to better understand and more effectively compete with the rest of the world. Illegal immigration undermines those benefits and affects U.S. workers. In an age of terrorism, drug cartels, human trafficking, and criminal gangs, the presence of millions of unidentified persons in this country poses grave risks to the safety and the sovereignty of the United States. Our highest priority, therefore, is to secure the rule of law both at our borders and at ports of entry.

We recognize that for most of those seeking entry into this country, the lack of respect for the rule of law in their homelands has meant economic exploitation and political oppression by corrupt elites. In this country, the rule of law guarantees equal treatment to every individual, including more than one million immigrants to whom we grant permanent residence every year. That is why we oppose any form of amnesty for those who, by intentionally violating the law, disadvantage those who have obeyed it. Granting amnesty only rewards and encourages more law breaking. We support the mandatory use of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (S.A.V.E.) program – an internet-based system that verifies the lawful presence of applicants – prior to the granting of any State or federal government entitlements or IRS refunds. We insist upon enforcement at the workplace through verification systems so that jobs can be available to all legal workers. Use of the E-verify program – an internet-based system that verifies the employment authorization and identity of employees – must be made mandatory nationwide. State enforcement efforts in the workplace must be welcomed, not attacked. When Americans need jobs, it is absolutely essential that we protect them from illegal labor in the workplace. In addition, it is why we demand tough penalties for those who practice identity theft, deal in fraudulent documents, and traffic in human beings. It is why we support Republican legislation to give the Department of Homeland Security long-term detention authority to keep dangerous but undeportable aliens off our streets, expedite expulsion of criminal aliens, and make gang membership a deportable offense.

The current Administration’s approach to immigration has undermined the rule of law at every turn. It has lessened work-site enforcement – and even allows the illegal aliens it does uncover to walk down the street to the next employer – and challenged legitimate State efforts to keep communities safe, suing them for trying to enforce the law when the federal government refuses to do so. It has created a backdoor amnesty program unrecognized in law, granting worker authorization to illegal aliens, and shown little regard for the life-and-death situations facing the men and women of the border patrol.

Perhaps worst of all, the current Administration has failed to enforce the legal means for workers or employers who want to operate within the law. In contrast, a Republican Administration and Congress will partner with local governments through cooperative enforcement agreements in Section 287g of the Immigration and Nationality Act to make communities safer for all and will consider, in light of both current needs and historic practice, the utility of a legal and reliable source of foreign labor where needed through a new guest worker program. We will create humane procedures to encourage illegal aliens to return home voluntarily, while enforcing the law against those who overstay their visas.

State efforts to reduce illegal immigration must be encouraged, not attacked. The pending Department of Justice lawsuits against Arizona, Alabama, South Carolina, and Utah must be dismissed immediately. The double-layered fencing on the border that was enacted by Congress in 2006, but never completed, must finally be built. In order to restore the rule of law, federal funding should be denied to sanctuary cities that violate federal law and endanger their own citizens, and federal funding should be denied to universities that provide in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens, in open defiance of federal law.

We are grateful to the thousands of new immigrants, many of them not yet citizens, who are serving in the Armed Forces. Their patriotism should encourage us all to embrace the newcomers legally among us, assist their journey to full citizenship, and help their communities avoid isolation from the mainstream of society. To that end, while we encourage the retention and transmission of heritage tongues, we support English as the nation’s official language, a unifying force essential for the educational and economic advancement of – not only immigrant communities – but also our nation as a whole.

Honoring Our Relationship with American Indians  (Top)

Based on both treaty and other law, the federal government has a unique government-to-government relationship with and trust responsibility for Indian Tribal Governments and American Indians and Alaska Natives. These obligations have not been sufficiently honored. The social and economic problems that plague Indian country have grown worse over the last several decades; we must reverse that trend. Ineffective federal programs deprive American Indians of the services they need, and long-term failures threaten to undermine tribal sovereignty itself.

American Indians have established elected tribal governments to carry out the public policies of the tribe, administer services to its tribal member constituents, and manage relations with federal, State, and local governments. We respect the tribal governments as the voice of their communities and encourage federal, State, and local governments to heed those voices in developing programs and partnerships to improve the quality of life for American Indians and their neighbors in their communities.

Republicans believe that economic self-sufficiency is the ultimate answer to the challenges confronting Indian country. We believe that tribal governments and their communities, not Washington bureaucracies, are best situated to craft solutions that will end systemic problems that create poverty and disenfranchisement. Just as the federal government should not burden States with regulations, it should not stifle the development of resources within the reservations, which need federal assistance to advance their commerce nationally through roads and technology. Federal and State regulations that thwart job creation must be withdrawn or redrawn so that tribal governments acting on behalf of American Indians are not disadvantaged. It is especially egregious that the Democratic Party has persistently undermined tribal sovereignty in order to provide advantage to union bosses in the tribal workplace.

Republicans recognize that each tribe has the right of consultation before any new regulatory policy is implemented on tribal land. To the extent possible, such consultation should take place in Indian country with the tribal government and its members. Before promulgating and imposing any new laws or regulations affecting trust land or members, the federal government should encourage Indian tribes to develop their own policies to achieve program objectives, and should defer to tribes to develop their own standards, or standards in conjunction with State governments.

Republicans reject a one-size-fits-all approach to federal-tribal-State partnerships and will work to expand local autonomy where tribal governments seek it. Better partnerships will help us to expand economic opportunity, deliver top-flight education to future generations, modernize and improve the Indian Health Service to make it more responsive to local needs, and build essential infrastructure in Indian country in cooperation with tribal neighbors. Our approach is to empower American Indians, through tribal self-determination and self-governance policies, to develop their greatest assets, human resources and the rich natural resources on their lands, without undue federal interference.

Like all Americans, American Indians want safe communities for their families; but inadequate resources and neglect have, over time, allowed criminal activities to plague Indian country. To protect everyone – and especially the most vulnerable: children, women, and elders – the legal system in tribal communities must provide stability and protect property rights. Everyone’s due process and civil rights must be safeguarded.

We support efforts to ensure equitable participation in federal programs by American Indians, including Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians and to preserve their culture and languages that we consider to be national treasures. Lastly, we recognize that American Indians have responded to the call for military service in percentage numbers far greater than have other groups of Americans. We honor that commitment, loyalty, and sacrifice of all American Indians serving in the military today and in years past and will ensure that all veterans and their families receive the care and respect they have earned through their loyal service to America.

Preserving the District of Columbia  (Top)

The nation’s capital city, a special responsibility of the federal government, belongs both to its residents and to all Americans, millions of whom visit it every year. Congressional Republicans have taken the lead in efforts to foster homeownership and open access to higher education for Washington residents. Against the opposition of the current President and leaders of the Democratic Party, they have fought to establish, and now to expand, the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, through which thousands of low-income children have been able to attend a school of their choice and receive a quality education.

D.C.’s Republicans have been in the forefront of exposing and combating the chronic corruption among the city’s top Democratic officials. We join their call for a non-partisan elected Attorney General to clean up the city’s political culture and for congressional action to enforce the spirit of the Home Rule Act assuring minority representation on the City Council. After decades of inept one-party rule, the city’s structural deficit demands congressional attention.

As the center of our government, the District contains many potential targets for terrorist attacks. Federal security agencies should work closely with local officials and regional administrations like the Washington Area Metropolitan Transit Authority. A top priority must be ensuring that all public transportation, especially Metro rails, is functioning in the event of an emergency evacuation. Also, to ensure protection of the fundamental right to keep and bear arms, we call on the governing authority to pass laws consistent with the Supreme Court’s decisions in the District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago cases, which upheld the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

We oppose statehood for the District of Columbia.

Modernizing the Federal Civil Service  (Top)

The federal workforce bears great responsibilities and sometimes wields tremendous power, especially when Congress delegates to it the execution of complicated and far-reaching legislation. We recognize the dedication of federal workers and the difficulty of their thankless task of implementing poorly drafted or open-ended legislation.

Under the current Administration, the civil service has grown by at least 140,000 workers, while the number making at least $150,000 has doubled. At a time when the national debt has increased to over $15.9 trillion under the current Administration, this is grossly irresponsible. The American people work too hard and too long to support a bloated government. We call for a reduction, through attrition, in the federal payroll of at least 10 percent and the adjustment of pay scales and benefits to reflect those of the private sector. We must bring the 130-year old Civil Service System into the twenty-first century. The federal pay system should be sufficiently flexible to acknowledge and reward those who dare to innovate, reduce overhead, optimize processes, and expedite paperwork.

Delinquency in paying taxes and repaying student loans has been too common in some segments of the civil service. A Republican Administration will make enforcement among its own employees a priority and, unlike the current Administration, will name to public office no one who has failed to meet their financial obligations to the government and fellow taxpayers.

America’s Future in Space: Continuing this Quest  (Top)

The exploration of space has been a key part of U.S. global leadership and has supported innovation and ownership of technology. Over the last half-century, in partnership with our aerospace industry, the work of NASA has helped define and strengthen our nation’s technological prowess. From building the world’s most powerful rockets to landing men on the Moon, sending robotic spacecraft throughout our solar system and beyond, building the International Space Station, and launching space-based telescopes that allow scientists to better understand our universe, NASA science and engineering have produced spectacular results. The technologies that emerged from those programs propelled our aerospace industrial base and directly benefit our national security, safety, economy, and quality of life. Through its achievements, NASA has inspired generations of Americans to study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, leading to careers that drive our country’s technological and economic engines.

Today, America’s leadership in space is challenged by countries eager to emulate – and surpass – NASA’s accomplishments. To preserve our national security interests and foster innovation and competitiveness, we must sustain our preeminence in space, launching more science missions, guaranteeing unfettered access, and maintaining a source of high-value American jobs.

Honoring and Supporting Americans in the Territories  (Top)

We honor the extraordinary sacrifices of the men and women of the territories who protect our freedom through their service in the U.S. Armed Forces. We welcome their greater participation in all aspects of the political process and affirm their right to seek the full extension of the Constitution, with all the rights and responsibilities it entails. U.S. territories face serious economic challenges as they struggle to retain existing industries and develop new ones. Development of local energy options is crucial to reduce their dependence on imported fuel and promote economic stability. The Pacific territories should have flexibility to determine the minimum wage, which has seriously restricted progress in the private sector. A stronger private sector can raise wages, reduce dependence on public sector employment, and lead toward local self-sufficiency. All unreasonable economic impediments must be removed, including unreasonable U.S. customs practices.

We support the right of the United States citizens of Puerto Rico to be admitted to the Union as a fully sovereign state if they freely so determine. We recognize that Congress has the final authority to define the constitutionally valid options for Puerto Rico to achieve a permanent non-territorial status with government by consent and full enfranchisement. As long as Puerto Rico is not a State, however, the will of its people regarding their political status should be ascertained by means of a general right of referendum or specific referenda sponsored by the U.S. government.

Photobucket

Renewing American Values to Build Healthy Families, Great Schools and Safe Neighborhoods

We are the party of independent individuals and the institutions they create – families, schools, congregations, neighborhoods – to advance their ideals and make real their dreams. Foremost among those institutions is the American family. It is the foundation of our society and the first level of self-government. Its daily lessons-cooperation, patience, mutual respect, responsibility, self-reliance – are fundamental to the order and progress of our Republic. Government can never replace the family. That is why we insist that public policy, from taxation to education, from healthcare to welfare, be formulated with attention to the needs and strengths of the family.

Preserving and Protecting Traditional Marriage  (Top)

The institution of marriage is the foundation of civil society. Its success as an institution will determine our success as a nation. It has been proven by both experience and endless social science studies that traditional marriage is best for children. Children raised in intact married families are more likely to attend college, are physically and emotionally healthier, are less likely to use drugs or alcohol, engage in crime, or get pregnant outside of marriage. The success of marriage directly impacts the economic well-being of individuals. Furthermore, the future of marriage affects freedom. The lack of family formation not only leads to more government costs, but also to more government control over the lives of its citizens in all aspects. We recognize and honor the courageous efforts of those who bear the many burdens of parenting alone, even as we believe that marriage, the union of one man and one woman must be upheld as the national standard, a goal to stand for, encourage, and promote through laws governing marriage. We embrace the principle that all Americans should be treated with respect and dignity.

Creating a Culture of Hope: Raising Families Beyond Poverty  (Top)

The Republican-led welfare reforms enacted in 1996 marked a revolution in government’s approach to poverty. They changed the standard for policy success from the amount of income transferred to the poor to the number of poor who moved from welfare to economic independence. We took the belief of most Americans – that welfare should be a hand up, not a hand out – and made it law. Work requirements, though modest, were at the heart of this success. That is why so many are now outraged by the current Administration’s recent decision to permit waivers for work requirements for welfare benefits, in other words, to administratively repeal the most successful anti-poverty policy in memory. Instead of undermining the expectation that low-income parents and individuals should strive to support themselves, benefit programs like food stamps must ensure that those benefits are better targeted to those who need help the most.

For the sake of low-income families as well as the taxpayers, the federal government’s entire system of public assistance should be reformed to ensure that it promotes work. Each year, this system dispenses nearly $1 trillion in taxpayer funds across a maze of approximately 80 programs that are neither coordinated nor effective in solving poverty and lifting up families. For many individuals collecting benefits from multiple categorical programs, efforts to work or earn more actually result in less money in their pocket through the resulting loss of benefits. This poverty trap would ensnare even more Americans if Obamacare were implemented. Taking a part time job, working an extra shift, or even just marrying someone who works, would result in a loss of benefits, thereby discouraging the very acts necessary to achieve the American Dream.

Adoption and Foster Care  (Top)

Families formed or enlarged by adoption strengthen our communities and ennoble our nation. We applaud the Republican legislative initiatives that led to a significant increase in adoptions in recent years, and we call upon the private sector to consider the needs of adoptive families on a par with others. Any restructuring of the federal tax code should recognize the financial impact of the adoption process and the commitment made by adoptive families. The nation’s foster care system remains a necessary fallback for youngsters from troubled families. Because of reforms initiated by many States, the number of foster children has declined to just over 400,000. A major problem of the system is its lack of support, financial and otherwise, for teens who age out of foster care and into a world in which many are not prepared to go it alone. We urge States to work with the faith-based and other community groups which reach out to these young people in need.

Making the Internet Family-Friendly  (Top)

Millions of Americans suffer from problem or pathological gambling that can destroy families. We support the prohibition of gambling over the Internet and call for reversal of the Justice Department’s decision distorting the formerly accepted meaning of the Wire Act that could open the door to Internet betting. The Internet must be made safe for children. We call on service providers to exercise due care to ensure that the Internet cannot become a safe haven for predators while respecting First Amendment rights. We congratulate the social networking sites that bar known sex offenders from participation. We urge active prosecution against child pornography, which is closely linked to the horrors of human trafficking. Current laws on all forms of pornography and obscenity need to be vigorously enforced.

Advancing Americans with Disabilities  (Top)

We renew our commitment to the inclusion of Americans with disabilities in all aspects of our national life. In keeping with that commitment, we oppose the non-consensual withholding of care or treatment from people with disabilities, including newborns, as well as the elderly and infirm, just as we oppose euthanasia and assisted suicide, which endanger especially those on the margins of society. Because government should set a positive standard in hiring and contracting for the services of persons with disabilities, we need to update the statutory authority for the Ability One program, a major avenue by which those productive members of our society can offer high quality services. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) has opened up unprecedented opportunities for many students, and we reaffirm our support for its goal of minimizing the separation of children with disabilities from their peers. We urge preventive efforts in early childhood, especially assistance in gaining pre-reading skills, to help many students move beyond the need for IDEA’s protections. We endorse the program of Employment First, developed by major disability rights groups, to replace dependency with jobs in the mainstream of the American workforce.

Repealing Obamacare  (Top)

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – Obamacare – was never really about healthcare, though its impact upon the nation’s health is disastrous. From its start, it was about power, the expansion of government control over one sixth of our economy, and resulted in an attack on our Constitution, by requiring that U.S. citizens purchase health insurance. We agree with the four dissenting justices of the Supreme Court: “In our view the entire Act before us is invalid in its entirety.” It was the high-water mark of an outdated liberalism, the latest attempt to impose upon Americans a euro-style bureaucracy to manage all aspects of their lives. Obamacare has been struck down in the court of public opinion and is falling by the weight of its own confusing, unworkable, budget-busting, and conflicting provisions. It would tremendously expand Medicaid without significant reform, leaving the States to assume unsustainable financial burdens. If fully implemented, it could not function; and Republican victories in the November elections will guarantee that it is never implemented. Congressional Republicans are committed to its repeal; and a Republican President, on the first day in office, will use his legitimate waiver authority under that law to halt its progress and then will sign its repeal. Then the American people, through the free market, can advance affordable and responsible healthcare reform that meets the needs and concerns of patients and providers. Through Obamacare, the current Administration has promoted the notion of abortion as healthcare. We, however, affirm the dignity of women by protecting the sanctity of human life. Numerous studies have shown that abortion endangers the health and well-being of women, and we stand firmly against it.

Our Prescription for American Healthcare: Improve Quality and Lower Costs  (Top)

We believe that taking care of one’s health is an individual responsibility. Chronic diseases, many of them related to lifestyle, drive healthcare costs, accounting for more than 75 percent of the nation’s medical spending. To reduce demand, and thereby lower costs, we must foster personal responsibility while increasing preventive services to promote healthy lifestyles. We believe that all Americans should have improved access to affordable, coordinated, quality healthcare, including individuals struggling with mental illness.

Our goal is to encourage the development of a healthcare system that provides higher quality care at a lower cost to all Americans while protecting the patient-physician relationship based on mutual trust, informed consent, and privileged patient confidentiality. We seek to increase healthcare choice and options, contain costs and reduce mandates, simplify the system for patients and providers, restore cuts made to Medicare, and equalize the tax treatment of group and individual health insurance plans. For most Americans, those who are insured now or who seek insurance in the future, our practical, non-intrusive reforms will promote flexibility in State leadership in healthcare reform, promote a free-market based system, and empower consumer choice. All of which will return direction of the nation’s healthcare to the people and away from the federal government.

To return the States to their proper role of regulating local insurance markets and caring for the needy, we propose to block grant Medicaid and other payments to the States; limit federal requirements on both private insurance and Medicaid; assist all patients, including those with pre-existing conditions, through reinsurance and risk adjustment; and promote non-litigation alternatives for dispute resolution. We call on State officials to carefully consider the increased costs of medical mandates, imposed under their laws, which may price many low-income families out of the insurance market. We call on the government to permanently ban all federal funding and subsidies for abortion and healthcare plans that include abortion coverage.

To achieve a free market in healthcare and ensure competition, we will promote price transparency so that consumers will know the actual cost of treatments before they undergo them. When patients are aware of costs, they are less likely to over-utilize services. We support legislation to cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits, thereby relieving conscientious providers of burdens that are not rightly theirs and addressing a serious cause of escalating medical bills. We will empower individuals and small businesses to form purchasing pools in order to expand coverage to the uninsured. Individuals with pre-existing conditions who maintain continuous insurance coverage should be protected from discrimination. We support technology enhancements for medical health records and data systems while affirming patient privacy and ownership of health information.

Ensuring Consumer Choice in Healthcare  (Top)

Consumer choice is the most powerful factor in healthcare reform. Today’s highly mobile work force requires portability of insurance coverage that can go with them from job to job. The need to maintain coverage should not dictate where families have to live and work. Putting the patient at the center of policy decisions will increase choice and reduce costs while ensuring that services provide what Americans actually want. We must end tax discrimination against the individual purchase of insurance and allow consumers to purchase insurance across State lines. While promoting “co-insurance” products and alternatives to “fee for service,” government must promote Health Savings Accounts and Health Reimbursement Accounts to be used for insurance premiums and should encourage the private sector to rate competing insurance plans. We will ensure that America’s aging population has access to safe and affordable care. Because seniors overwhelmingly desire to age at home, we will make home care a priority in public policy. We will champion the right of individual choice in senior care. We will aggressively implement programs to protect against elder abuse, and we will work to ensure that quality care is provided across the care continuum from home to nursing home to hospice.

Supporting Federal Healthcare Research and Development  (Top)

We support federal investment in healthcare delivery systems and solutions creating innovative means to provide greater, more cost-effective access to high quality healthcare. We also support federal investment in basic and applied biomedical research, especially the neuroscience research that may hold great potential for dealing with diseases and disorders such as Autism, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson’s. If we are to make significant headway against breast and prostate cancer, diabetes, and other killers, research must consider the special needs of formerly neglected groups. We call for expanded support for the stem-cell research that now offers the greatest hope for many afflictions – with adult stem cells, umbilical cord blood, and cells reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells-without the destruction of embryonic human life. We urge a ban on human cloning and on the creation of or experimentation on human embryos. We support restoring the Drug Enforcement Administration ban on the use of controlled substances for physician-assisted suicide. We oppose the FDA approval of Mifeprex, formerly known as RU-486, and similar drugs that terminate innocent human life after conception.

Protecting Individual Conscience in Healthcare  (Top)

No healthcare professional or organization should ever be required to perform, provide for, withhold, or refer for a medical service against their conscience. This is especially true of the religious organizations which deliver a major portion of America’s healthcare, a service rooted in the charity of faith communities. We do not believe, however, that healthcare providers should be allowed to withhold services because the healthcare provider believes the patient’s life is not worth living. We support the ability of all organizations to provide, purchase, or enroll in healthcare coverage consistent with their religious, moral or ethical convictions without discrimination or penalty. We likewise support the right of parents to consent to medical treatment for their children, including mental health treatment, drug treatment, and treatment involving pregnancy, contraceptives and abortion. We urge enactment of pending legislation that would require parental consent to transport girls across state lines for abortions.

Reforming the FDA  (Top)

America’s leadership in life sciences R&D and medical innovation is being threatened. As a country, we must work together now or lose our leadership position in medical innovation, U.S. job creation, and access to life-saving treatments for U.S. patients. The United States has led the global medical device and pharmaceutical industries for decades. This leadership has made the U.S. the medical innovation capital of the world, bringing millions of high-paying jobs to our country and life-saving devices and drugs to our nation’s patients. But that leadership position is at risk; patients, innovators, and job creators point to the lack of predictability, consistency, transparency and efficiency at the Food and Drug Administration that is driving innovation overseas, benefiting foreign, not U.S., patients. We pledge to reform the FDA so we can ensure that the U.S. remains the world leader in medical innovation, that device and drug jobs stay in the U.S., that U.S. patients benefit first from new devices and drugs, and that the FDA no longer wastes U.S. taxpayer and innovators’ resources because of bureaucratic red tape and legal uncertainty.

Reducing Costs through Tort Reform  (Top)

Frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits have ballooned the cost of healthcare for the average American. Physicians are increasingly practicing defensive medicine because of the looming threat of malpractice liability. Moreover, some medical practitioners are avoiding patients with complex and high-risk medical problems because of the high costs of medical malpractice lawsuits. Rural America is hurt especially hard as obstetricians, surgeons, and other healthcare providers are moving to urban settings or retiring, causing a significant healthcare workforce shortage and subsequently decreasing access to care for all patients. We are committed to aggressively pursuing tort reform legislation to help avoid the practice of defensive medicine, to keep healthcare costs low, and improve healthcare quality.

Education: A Chance for Every Child  (Top)

Parents are responsible for the education of their children. We do not believe in a one size fits all approach to education and support providing broad education choices to parents and children at the State and local level. Maintaining American preeminence requires a world-class system of education, with high standards, in which all students can reach their potential. Today’s education reform movement calls for accountability at every stage of schooling. It affirms higher expectations for all students and rejects the crippling bigotry of low expectations. It recognizes the wisdom of State and local control of our schools, and it wisely sees consumer rights in education – choice – as the most important driving force for renewing our schools.

Education is much more than schooling. It is the whole range of activities by which families and communities transmit to a younger generation, not just knowledge and skills, but ethical and behavioral norms and traditions. It is the handing over of a personal and cultural identity. That is why education choice has expanded so vigorously. It is also why American education has, for the last several decades, been the focus of constant controversy, as centralizing forces outside the family and community have sought to remake education in order to remake America. They have not succeeded, but they have done immense damage.

Attaining Academic Excellence for All  (Top)

Since 1965 the federal government has spent $2 trillion on elementary and secondary education with no substantial improvement in academic achievement or high school graduation rates (which currently are 59 percent for African-American students and 63 percent for Hispanics). The U.S. spends an average of more than $10,000 per pupil per year in public schools, for a total of more than $550 billion. That represents more than 4 percent of GDP devoted to K-12 education in 2010. Of that amount, federal spending was more than $47 billion. Clearly, if money were the solution, our schools would be problem-free.

More money alone does not necessarily equal better performance. After years of trial and error, we know what does work, what has actually made a difference in student advancement, and what is powering education reform at the local level all across America: accountability on the part of administrators, parents and teachers; higher academic standards; programs that support the development of character and financial literacy; periodic rigorous assessments on the fundamentals, especially math, science, reading, history, and geography; renewed focus on the Constitution and the writings of the Founding Fathers, and an accurate account of American history that celebrates the birth of this great nation; transparency, so parents and the public can discover which schools best serve their pupils; flexibility and freedom to innovate, so schools can adapt to the special needs of their students and hold teachers and administrators responsible for student performance. We support the innovations in education reform occurring at the State level based upon proven results. Republican Governors have led in the effort to reform our country’s underperforming education system, and we applaud these advancements. We advocate the policies and methods that have proven effective: building on the basics, especially STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering, and math) and phonics; ending social promotions; merit pay for good teachers; classroom discipline; parental involvement; and strong leadership by principals, superintendents, and locally elected school boards. Because technology has become an essential tool of learning, proper implementation of technology is a key factor in providing every child equal access and opportunity.

Consumer Choice in Education  (Top)

The Republican Party is the party of fresh and innovative ideas in education. We support options for learning, including home schooling and local innovations like single-sex classes, full-day school hours, and year-round schools. School choice – whether through charter schools, open enrollment requests, college lab schools, virtual schools, career and technical education programs, vouchers, or tax credits – is important for all children, especially for families with children trapped in failing schools. Getting those youngsters into decent learning environments and helping them to realize their full potential is the greatest civil rights challenge of our time. We support the promotion of local career and technical educational programs and entrepreneurial programs that have been supported by leaders in industry and will retrain and retool the American workforce, which is the best in the world. A young person’s ability to achieve in school must be based on his or her God-given talent and motivation, not an address, zip code, or economic status.

In sum, on the one hand enormous amounts of money are being spent for K-12 public education with overall results that do not justify that spending. On the other hand, the common experience of families, teachers, and administrators forms the basis of what does work in education. We believe the gap between those two realities can be successfully bridged, and Congressional Republicans are pointing a new way forward with major reform legislation. We support its concept of block grants and the repeal of numerous federal regulations which interfere with State and local control of public schools.

The bulk of the federal money through Title I for low-income children and through IDEA for disabled youngsters should follow the students to whatever school they choose so that eligible pupils, through open enrollment, can bring their share of the funding with them. The Republican-founded D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program should be expanded as a model for the rest of the country. We deplore the efforts by Congressional Democrats and the current President to kill this successful program for disadvantaged students in order to placate the leaders of the teachers’ unions. We support putting the needs of students before the special interests of unions when approaching elementary and secondary education reform.

Because parents are a child’s first teachers, we support family literacy programs, which improve the reading, language, and life skills of both parents and children from low-income families. To ensure that all students have access to the mainstream of American life, we support the English First approach and oppose divisive programs that limit students’ ability to advance in American society. We renew our call for replacing “family planning” programs for teens with abstinence education which teaches abstinence until marriage as the responsible and respected standard of behavior. Abstinence from sexual activity is the only protection that is 100 percent effective against out-of-wedlock pregnancies and sexually-transmitted diseases including HIV/AIDS when transmitted sexually. It is effective, science-based, and empowers teens to achieve optimal health outcomes and avoid risks of sexual activity. We oppose school-based clinics that provide referrals, counseling, and related services for abortion and contraception. We support keeping federal funds from being used in mandatory or universal mental health, psychiatric, or socio- emotional screening programs.

We applaud America’s great teachers, who should be protected against frivolous litigation and should be able to take reasonable actions to maintain discipline and order in the classroom. We support legislation that will correct the current law provision which defines a “Highly Qualified Teacher” merely by his or her credentials, not results in the classroom. We urge school districts to make use of teaching talent in business, STEM fields, and in the military, especially among our returning veterans. Rigid tenure systems based on the “last in, first out” policy should be replaced with a merit-based approach that can attract fresh talent and dedication to the classroom. All personnel who interact with school children should pass background checks and be held to the highest standards of personal conduct.

Improving Our Nation’s Classrooms  (Top)

Higher education faces its own challenges, many of which stem from the poor preparation of students before they reach college. One consequence has been the multiplying number of remedial courses for freshmen. Even so, our universities, large and small, public or private, form the world’s greatest assemblage of learning. They drive much of the research that keeps America competitive and, by admitting large numbers of foreign students, convey our values and culture to the world.

Ideological bias is deeply entrenched within the current university system. Whatever the solution in private institutions may be, in State institutions the trustees have a responsibility to the public to ensure that their enormous investment is not abused for political indoctrination. We call on State officials to ensure that our public colleges and universities be places of learning and the exchange of ideas, not zones of intellectual intolerance favoring the Left.

Addressing Rising College Costs  (Top)

College costs, however, are on an unsustainable trajectory, rising year by year far ahead of overall inflation. Nationwide, student loan debt now exceeds credit card debt, roughly $23,300 for each of the 35,000,000 debtors, taking years to pay off. Over 50 percent of recent college grads are unemployed or underemployed, working at jobs for which their expensive educations gave them no training. It is time to get back to basics and to higher education programs directly related to job opportunities.

The first step is to acknowledge the need for change when the status quo is not working. New systems of learning are needed to compete with traditional four-year colleges: expanded community colleges and technical institutions, private training schools, online universities, life-long learning, and work-based learning in the private sector. New models for acquiring advanced skills will be ever more important in the rapidly changing economy of the twenty-first century, especially in science, technology, engineering, and math. Public policy should advance the affordability, innovation, and transparency needed to address all these challenges and to make accessible to everyone the emerging alternatives, with their lower cost degrees, to traditional college attendance.

Federal student aid is on an unsustainable path, and efforts should be taken to provide families with greater transparency and the information they need to make prudent choices about a student’s future: completion rates, repayment rates, future earnings, and other factors that may affect their decisions. The federal government should not be in the business of originating student loans; however, it should serve as an insurance guarantor for the private sector as they offer loans to students. Private sector participation in student financing should be welcomed. Any regulation that drives tuition costs higher must be reevaluated to balance its worth against its negative impact on students and their parents.

Justice for All: Safe Neighborhoods and Prison Reform  (Top)

The most effective forces in reducing crime and other social ills are strong families and caring communities supported by excellent law enforcement. Both reinforce constructive conduct and ethical standards by setting examples and providing safe havens from dangerous and destructive behaviors. But even under the best social circumstances, strong, well-trained law enforcement is necessary to protect us all, and especially the weak and vulnerable, from predators. Our national experience over the last several decades has shown that citizen vigilance, tough but fair prosecutors, meaningful sentences, protection of victims’ rights, and limits on judicial discretion can preserve public safety by keeping criminals off the streets.

Liberals do not understand this simple axiom: criminals behind bars cannot harm the general public. To that end, we support mandatory prison sentencing for gang crimes, violent or sexual offenses against children, repeat drug dealers, rape, robbery and murder. We support a national registry for convicted child murderers. We oppose parole for dangerous or repeat felons. Courts should have the option of imposing the death penalty in capital murder cases.

In solidarity with those who protect us, we call for mandatory prison time for all assaults involving serious injury to law enforcement officers. Criminals injured in the course of their crimes should not be able to seek monetary damages from their intended victims or from the public.

While getting criminals off the street is essential, more attention must be paid to the process of restoring those individuals to the community. Prisons should do more than punish; they should attempt to rehabilitate and institute proven prisoner reentry systems to reduce recidivism and future victimization. We endorse State and local initiatives that are trying new approaches, often called accountability courts.

Government at all levels should work with faith-based institutions that have proven track records in diverting young and first time, non-violent offenders from criminal careers, for which we salute them. Their emphasis on restorative justice, to make the victim whole and put the offender on the right path, can give law enforcement the flexibility it needs in dealing with different levels of criminal behavior. We endorse State and local initiatives that are trying new approaches to curbing drug abuse and diverting first-time offenders to rehabilitation.

Public authorities must regain control of their correctional institutions, for we cannot allow prisons to become ethnic or racial battlegrounds. Persons jailed for whatever cause should be protected against cruel or degrading treatment by other inmates. In some cases, the institution of family-friendly policies may curtail prison violence and reduce the rate of recidivism, thus reducing the enormous fiscal and social costs of incarceration. Breaking the cycle of crime begins with the children of those who are prisoners. Deprived of a parent through no fault of their own, these youngsters should be a special concern of our schools, social services, and religious institutions. Thirty years ago, President Reagan’s Task Force on Victims of Crime, calling the neglect of crime victims a “national disgrace,” proposed a Constitutional amendment to secure their formal rights. While some progress has been made to rectify that situation, the need for national action still persists in the unacceptable treatment of innocent victims. We call on the States to make it a bipartisan priority to protect the rights of crime victims, who should also be assured of access to social and legal services; and we call on the Congress to make the federal courts a model in this regard for the rest of the country.

The resources of the federal government’s law enforcement and judicial systems have been strained by two unfortunate expansions: the over-criminalization of behavior and the over-federalization of offenses. The number of criminal offenses in the U.S. Code increased from 3,000 in the early 1980s to over 4,450 by 2008. Federal criminal law should focus on acts by federal employees or acts committed on federal property – and leave the rest to the States. Then Congress should withdraw from federal departments and agencies the power to criminalize behavior, a practice which, according to the Congressional Research Service, has created “tens of thousands” of criminal offenses. No one other than an elected representative should have the authority to define a criminal act and set criminal penalties. In the same way, Congress should reconsider the extent to which it has federalized offenses traditionally handled on the State or local level.

Photobucket

American Exceptionalism

We are the party of peace through strength. Professing American exceptionalism – the conviction that our country holds a unique place and role in human history – we proudly associate ourselves with those Americans of all political stripes who, more than three decades ago in a world as dangerous as today’s, came together to advance the cause of freedom. Repudiating the folly of an amateur foreign policy and defying a worldwide Marxist advance, they announced their strategy in the timeless slogan we repeat today: peace through strength – an enduring peace based on freedom and the will to defend it, and American democratic values and the will to promote them. While the twentieth century was undeniably an American century – with strong leadership, adherence to the principles of freedom and democracy our Founders’ enshrined in our nation’s Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and a continued reliance on Divine Providence – the twenty-first century will be one of American greatness as well.

Today’s adversaries are different, as are their weapons and their ideology, but this remains the same: the unity of Americans, beyond party, in gratitude to those who have defended our country, pursued its attackers to the ends of the earth, and today stand vigilant guard in our cities, on our coasts, and in alien lands. We pledge to our servicemen and women the authority and resources they need to protect the nation and defend America’s freedom. Continued vigilance, especially in travel and commerce, is necessary to prevent bioterrorism, cyber terrorism, and other asymmetric or non-traditional warfare attacks and to ensure that the horror of September 11, 2001 is never repeated on our soil.

Our country and its way of life have enemies both abroad and within our shores. We affirm the need for our military to protect the nation by finding and capturing our enemies and the necessity for the President to have the tools to deal with these threats. As history has sadly shown, even our fellow citizens may rarely become enemies of their country. Nevertheless, our government must continue to ensure the protections under our Constitution to all citizens, particularly the rights of habeas corpus and due process of law.

History proves that the best way to promote peace and prevent costly wars is to ensure that we constantly renew America’s economic strength. A healthy American economy is what underwrites and sustains American power. The current Administration is weakening America at home through anemic growth, high unemployment, and record-setting debt. We must therefore rebuild our economy and solve our fiscal crisis. In an American century, America will have the strongest economy and the strongest military in the world.

The Current Administration’s Failure: Leading From Behind  (Top)

The Republican Party is the advocate for a strong national defense as the pathway to peace, economic prosperity, and the protection of those yearning to be free. Since the end of World War II, American military superiority has been the cornerstone of a strategy that seeks to deter aggression or defeat those who threaten our national security interests. In 1981, President Reagan came to office with an agenda of strong American leadership, beginning with a restoration of our country’s military strength. The rest is history, written in the rubble of the Berlin Wall and the Iron Curtain.

We face a similar challenge today. The current Administration has responded with weakness to some of the gravest threats to our national security this country has faced, including the proliferation of transnational terrorism, continued belligerence by a nuclear-armed North Korea, an Iran in pursuit of nuclear weapons, rising Chinese hegemony in the Asia Pacific region, Russian activism, and threats from cyber espionage and terrorism. In response to these growing threats, President Obama has reduced the defense budget by over $487 billion over the next decade and fought Republican efforts to avoid another $500 billion in automatic budget cuts through a sequestration in early 2013 that will take a meat ax to all major defense programs.

The Dangers of A Hollow Force: The Looming Sequestration  (Top)

Sequestration – which is severe, automatic, across-the-board cuts in defense spending over the next decade – of the nation’s military budget would be a disaster for national security, imperiling the safety of our servicemen and women, accelerating the decline of our nation’s defense industrial base, and resulting in the layoff of more than 1 million skilled workers. Opposition to sequester is bipartisan; even the current Secretary of Defense has said the cuts will be “devastating” to America’s military. Yet the current President supported sequestration, signed it into law, and has threatened to veto Republican efforts to prevent it. If he allows an additional half trillion dollars to be cut from the defense budget, America will be left with the smallest ground force since 1940, the smallest number of ships since 1915, and the smallest Air Force in its history – at a time when our Nation faces a growing range of threats to our national security and a struggling economy that can ill afford to lose 1.5 million defense-related jobs.

Leaks for Political Purposes  (Top)

The current Administration’s leaks of classified information have imperiled intelligence assets which are vital to American security. This conduct is contemptible. It betrays our national interest. It compromises our men and women in the field. And it demands a full and prompt investigation by a special counsel. Equally threatening to the long-term strength and safety of our Armed Forces are the current Administration’s efforts to sacrifice our national security for political gain and a partisan agenda. We give the current President credit for maintaining his predecessor’s quiet determination and planning to bring to justice the man behind the 9/11 attack on America, but he has tolerated publicizing the details of the operation to kill the leader of Al Qaeda; those leaks exposed the tactics and techniques of our Special Operations forces and denied our nation an unprecedented intelligence opportunity. Subsequent leaks by senior Administration officials regarding cyber warfare, the use of drones against Al Qaeda and its operatives, and the targeting of our enemies – unprecedented leaks that compromised key sources and methods and damaged our national security – served the single purpose of propping up the image of a weak President.

A Failed National Security Strategy  (Top)

The current Administration’s most recent National Security Strategy reflects the extreme elements in its liberal domestic coalition. It is a budget-constrained blueprint that, if fully implemented, will diminish the capabilities of our Armed Forces. The strategy significantly increases the risk of future conflict by declaring to our adversaries that we will no longer maintain the forces necessary to fight and win more than one conflict at a time. It relies on the good intentions and capabilities of international organizations to justify constraining American military readiness. Finally, the strategy subordinates our national security interests to environmental, energy, and international health issues, and elevates “climate change” to the level of a “severe threat” equivalent to foreign aggression. The word “climate,” in fact, appears in the current President’s strategy more often than Al Qaeda, nuclear proliferation, radical Islam, or weapons of mass destruction. The phrase “global war on terror” does not appear at all, and has been purposely avoided and changed by his Administration to “overseas contingency operations.”

Conventional Forces in Decline  (Top)

More than a century ago, Republican President Theodore Roosevelt predicted that America’s future was in the Pacific. That future is here today, but it can develop peacefully only under the shield of American Naval and Air power. Yet the current Administration plans to significantly curtail production of our most advanced combat aircraft, decommission 6 of 60 Air Force tactical squadrons, and eliminate critical air mobility assets, including 27 giant C-5As and 65 C-130s, while divesting the nation of the brand new C-27.

The President plans to reduce our naval forces by retiring seven cruisers and slowing work on amphibious ships and attack submarines, further reducing the Navy that already has the smallest fleet since the early years of the twentieth century. And he will reduce ground forces by separating 100,000 soldiers and Marines – many of whom will be discharged after recently returning from combat – and another 100,000 under the sequester.

These plans limit our strategic flexibility in an increasingly dangerous world. The current President is repeating the disastrous cuts of the post-Vietnam war era, putting our nation in danger of returning to the “hollow force” of the Carter Administration, when the U.S. military was not respected in the world.

Nuclear Forces and Missile Defense Imperiled  (Top)

We recognize that the gravest terror threat we face – a nuclear attack made possible by nuclear proliferation – requires a comprehensive strategy for reducing the world’s nuclear stockpiles and preventing the spread of those armaments. But the U.S. can lead that effort only if it maintains an effective strategic arsenal at a level sufficient to fulfill its deterrent purposes, a notable failure of the current Administration.

The United States is the only nuclear power not modernizing its nuclear stockpile. It took the current Administration just one year to renege on the President’s commitment to modernize the neglected infrastructure of the nuclear weapons complex – a commitment made in exchange for approval of the New START treaty. In tandem with this, the current Administration has systematically undermined America’s missile defense, abandoning the missile defense bases in Poland and the Czech Republic, reducing the number of planned interceptors in Alaska, and cutting the budget for missile defense. In an embarrassing open microphone discussion with former Russian President Medvedev, the current President made clear that, if he wins a second term, he intends to exercise “more flexibility” to appease Russia, which means further undermining our missile defense capabilities. A Republican President will be honest and forthright with the American people about his policies and plans and not whisper promises to authoritarian leaders.

A strong and effective strategic arsenal is still necessary as a deterrent against competitors like Russia or China. But the danger in this age of asymmetric or non-traditional warfare comes from other quarters as well. With unstable regimes in Iran and North Korea determined to develop nuclear-tipped missiles capable of reaching the United States, with the possibility that a terrorist group could gain control of a nuclear weapon, it is folly to abandon a missile shield for the country.

A Twenty-First Century Threat: The Cybersecurity Danger  (Top)

The frequency, sophistication, and intensity of cyber-related incidents within the United States have increased steadily over the past decade and will continue to do so until it is made clear that a cyber attack against the United States will not be tolerated. The current Administration’s cyber security policies have failed to curb malicious actions by our adversaries, and no wonder, for there is no active deterrence protocol. The current deterrence framework is overly reliant on the development of defensive capabilities and has been unsuccessful in dissuading cyber-related aggression. The U.S. cannot afford to risk the cyber-equivalent of Pearl Harbor.

The government and private sector must work together to address the cyberthreats posed to the United States, help the free flow of information between network managers, and encourage innovation and investment in cybersecurity. The government must do a better job of protecting its own systems, which contain some of the most sensitive data and control some of our most important facilities. As such, we encourage an immediate update of the law that was drafted a decade ago to improve the security of government information systems. Additionally, we must invest in continuing research to develop cutting-edge cybersecurity technologies to protect the U.S. However, we acknowledge that the most effective way of combating potential cybersecurity threats is sharing cyberthreat information between the government and industry, as well as protecting the free flow of information within the private sector.

The current Administration’s laws and policies undermine what should be a collaborative relationship and put both the government and private entities at a severe disadvantage in proactively identifying potential cyberthreats. The costly and heavy-handed regulatory approach by the current Administration will increase the size and cost of the federal bureaucracy and harm innovation in cybersecurity. The government collects valuable information about potential threats that can and should be shared with private entities without compromising national security. We believe that companies should be free from legal and regulatory barriers that prevent or deter them from voluntarily sharing cyberthreat information with their government partners.

An America That Leads: The Republican National Security Strategy for the Future  (Top)

We will honor President Reagan’s legacy of peace through strength by advancing the most cost-effective programs and policies crucial to our national security, including our economic security and fiscal solvency. To do that, we must honestly assess the threats facing this country, and we must be able to articulate candidly to the American people our priorities for the use of taxpayer dollars to address those threats.

We must deter any adversary who would attack us or use terror as a tool of government. Every potential enemy must have no doubt that our capabilities, our commitment, and our will to defeat them are clear, unwavering, and unequivocal. We must immediately employ a new blueprint for a National Military Strategy that is based on an informed and validated assessment of the potential threats we face, one that restores as a principal objective the deterrence using the full spectrum of our military capabilities. As Ronald Reagan proved by the victorious conclusion of the Cold War, only our capability to wield overwhelming military power can truly deter the enemies of the United States from threatening our people and our national interests.

In order to deter aggression from nation-states, we must maintain military and technical superiority through innovation while upgrading legacy systems including aircraft and armored vehicles. We must deter the threat posed by rogue aggressors with the assurance that justice will be served through state-of-the-art surveillance, enhanced special operations capabilities, and unmanned aerial systems.

We will employ the full range of military and intelligence options to defeat Al Qaeda and its affiliates who threaten not just the West but the community of nations. We will have a comprehensive and just detainee policy that treats those who would attack our nation as enemy combatants. We will accept no arms control agreement that limits our right to self-defense; and we will fully deploy a missile defense shield for the people of the United States and for our allies.

We will pursue an effective cybersecurity strategy, supported by the necessary resources, that recognizes the importance of offensive capabilities. Whether it is a nation-state actively probing our national security networks, a terror organization seeking to obtain destructive cyber capabilities, or a criminal network’s theft of intellectual property, more must be done to deter, defeat, and respond to cyberthreats.

We will restore the morale and advance the capabilities of our intelligence community to ensure that the President and our military leaders are fully informed in an uncertain and increasingly dangerous world. We will restore accountability to ensure that our nation’s most sensitive information and activities are protected appropriately.

The Department of Defense, like all government agencies, needs to be careful to spend taxpayers’ dollars wisely. We will implement sound management policies to ensure the timely, cost-effective delivery of the tools our troops need to fight. We reject Congressional earmarks that put personal and parochial interests ahead of military effectiveness and the best interests of the nation. We recognize the need for, and value of, competition within a robust industrial base to most effectively maximize quality and drive down costs in everything the Department buys.

Supporting our Troops, Standing By Our Heroes  (Top)

The foundation of our military lies in the men and women who wear our country’s uniform, whether on active duty or in the Reserves and National Guard, and the families who support them. Under no circumstances will we reveal any secret or detail of a military operation that could put our people into additional harm’s way. The members of our military should be treated with the utmost respect and dignity. We reject the use of the military as a platform for social experimentation and will not accept attempts to undermine military priorities and mission readiness.

Consistent with this commitment, we believe compensation and conditions for our Armed Forces in place at the time military service is initiated should be sufficient to attract and retain quality men and women as we honor our promises and commitments to veterans, retirees, and their families. These shall continue and not be reduced or otherwise diminished while in service, or upon separation, or retirement. The combat readiness of our Armed Forces is the foundation of strength and deterrence. Readiness requires a consistent and sustained investment in the training and re-equipping of our military personnel. We will never assume the risk of reduced readiness, and we can never return to the “hollow” forces of the 1970s. Combat readiness also requires that we reserve troops for truly necessary operations by not overextending them around the world. We recognize that drastic cuts to our military’s end strength pose severe national security challenges. To avoid the overextension of our forces, we support a larger active force and oppose cuts to the National Guard and Reserves.

The all-volunteer force, begun on the watch of Republican Presidents, has carried America to victory from the Caribbean and Central America to the Balkans and Southwest Asia. We oppose the reinstatement of the draft whether directly or through compulsory national service. We support the advancement of women in the military, which has not only opened doors of opportunity for individuals but has also made possible the devoted, and often heroic, services of additional members of every branch of the Armed Forces. We support military women’s exemption from direct ground combat units and infantry battalions. We affirm the cultural values that encourage selfless service and superiority in battle, and we oppose anything which might divide or weaken team cohesion, including intra-military special interest demonstrations. We will support an objective and open-minded review of the current Administration’s management of military personnel policies and will correct problems with appropriate administrative, legal, or legislative action.

The National Guard and Reserves are a fully operational and battle-tested component of our Armed Forces. Many of them have heroically served for multiple deployments resulting in inadequate time between deployments, also known as dwell time. We pledge to maintain their manpower and equipment strength and to ensure their members receive the pay, benefits, and adequate training to continue their service and maintain mission readiness through Presidential leadership and Congressional budget support. Their historic and continuing role as citizen-soldiers is a proud tradition linking every community across America to the cause of freedom. We affirm service members’ legal right to return to their civilian jobs, whether in government or the private sector, and we urge greater transition assistance to and from employers as they return to the civilian world. Especially in light of the high unemployment rates faced by younger Reserve and Guard members, we salute those employers who have wisely decided that it is a smart and patriotic business decision to hire those who have served above and beyond the call of duty.

The spiritual welfare of our troops and retired service members should be a priority of our national leadership. With military suicides running at the rate of one a day, with post-service medical conditions, including addiction and mental illness, and with the financial stress and homelessness that is often related to these factors, there is an urgent need for the kind of counseling that faith-based institutions can best provide. We support rights of conscience and religious freedom for military chaplains and people of faith. A Republican Commander in Chief will protect religious independence of military chaplains and will not tolerate attempts to ban Bibles or religious symbols from military facilities. We will enforce and defend in court the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in the Armed Forces as well as in the civilian world.

We call upon the entire chain of command – from the President and the Secretary of Defense, to base and unit commanders – to ensure that our troops and retired service members, wherever stationed, have the opportunity to vote in the November elections, and that their ballots will be returned in time to be properly counted. Those who fight for and defend freedom around the world must not be disenfranchised.

Recognizing and Supporting Military Families  (Top)

The families of our military personnel currently serving, retired service members, and veterans must also be assured of the pay, health care, housing, education, and overall support they have earned. We will ensure that the federal government keeps its commitments to those who signed on the dotted line of enlistment with the assurance that those promises would be kept. We must also do more to retain the services of those service members who have borne the fight since 2001.

We must acknowledge that as our troops have experienced repeated deployments, so have their families. We are committed to providing programs that offer readjustment information and counseling to our military families, and urge States to offer support for job programs, license reciprocity, one-stop service centers, and education programs to support these families. The nation must also recognize the ultimate sacrifice of survivors and protect their benefits. We will work to protect service members and their families by not overextending their deployments.

Honoring and Supporting Our Veterans: A Sacred Obligation  (Top)

America has a sacred trust with our veterans, and we are committed to providing them and their families with care and dignity. This is particularly true because our nation’s warriors are volunteers, who served from a sense of duty. The work of the Department of Veterans Affairs – with a staff of 300,000 – is essential to meet our obligations to them: providing health, education, disability, survivor, and home loan benefit services and arranging memorial services upon death. All its branches in those various fields must be made more responsive, moving from an adversarial to an advocacy relationship with veterans. To that end we will consider a fundamental change in structure to make the regional directors of the Department presidential appointees rather than careerists.

Our wounded warriors, whether still in service or discharged, deserve the best medical care our country can provide. The nature of the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan has resulted in an unprecedented incidence of traumatic brain injury, loss of limbs, and post-traumatic stress disorder which calls for a new commitment of resources and personnel for its treatment and care to promote recovery. We must make military and veterans’ medicine the gold standard for mental health care, advances in prosthetics, and treatment of trauma and eye injuries. We must heed Abraham Lincoln’s command “to care for him who bore the battle.” To care, as well, for the families of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice, who must be assured of meaningful financial assistance, remains our solemn duty.

Because the conditions of warfare have changed dramatically since the war on terror began, today’s veterans face new challenges. Asymmetrical or non-traditional warfare results in a high incidence of severe conditions that must receive high priority and call for continued research into prevention and treatment.

We are committed to ending homelessness for our veterans. One key is to assist their reentry into the job market as soon as possible after military service ends. A job for a veteran is more than a source of income. It is a new mission, with a new status, and the transition can be difficult. It is a national scandal that veterans are one of the groups with the highest unemployment rates. We urge the private sector to make hiring vets a company policy and commend the many organizations that have specific programs to accomplish this. But the federal government must take the lead by simplifying the paper work required for a tax break for hiring a veteran and by giving vets their assured place at the head of the training and employment line.

Every State has an office dealing with veterans. The federal Department needs to consider these as partners in assisting vets, recognizing that those closest to the individual can best diagnose a problem and apply a remedy. This is especially important with regard to the determination of veterans’ disability claims. If private insurance companies can deal with car wrecks and hurricanes within weeks or months, it is inexplicable that the federal government takes, on average, a year to process a veteran’s claim. We urge immediate action to review the automatic denial of gun ownership to returning members of our Armed Forces who have had representatives appointed to manage their financial affairs.

Sovereign American Leadership in International Organizations  (Top)

Since the end of World War II, the United States, through the founding of the United Nations and NATO, has participated in a wide range of international organizations which can, but sometimes do not, serve the cause of peace and prosperity. While acting through them, our country must always reserve the right to go its own way. There can be no substitute for principled American leadership.

The United Nations remains in dire need of reform, starting with full transparency in the financial operations of its overpaid bureaucrats. As long as its scandal-ridden management continues, as long as some of the world’s worst tyrants hold seats on its Human Rights Council, and as long as Israel is treated as a pariah state, the U.N. cannot expect the full support of the American people.

The United Nations Population Fund has a shameful record of collaboration with China’s program of compulsory abortion. We affirm the Republican Party’s long-held position known as the Mexico City Policy, first announced by President Reagan in 1984, which prohibits the granting of federal monies to non-governmental organization that provide or promote abortion.

Under our Constitution, treaties become the law of the land. So it is all the more important that the Congress – the Senate through its ratifying power and the House through its appropriating power – shall reject agreements whose long-range impact on the American family is ominous or unclear. These include the U.N. Convention on Women’s Rights, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty as well as the various declarations from the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development. Because of our concern for American sovereignty, domestic management of our fisheries, and our country’s long-term energy needs, we have deep reservations about the regulatory, legal, and tax regimes inherent in the Law of the Sea Treaty and congratulate Senate Republicans for blocking its ratification. We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty, and we oppose any form of U.N. Global Tax. We oppose any diplomatic efforts that could result in giving the United Nations unprecedented control over the Internet. International regulatory control over the open and free Internet would have disastrous consequences for the United States and the world.

To shield members of our Armed Forces and others in service to America from ideological prosecutions overseas, the Republican Party does not accept the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. We support statutory protection for U.S. personnel and officials as they act abroad to meet our global security requirements.

Protecting Human Rights  (Top)

To those who stand in the darkness of tyranny, America has always been a beacon of hope, and so it must remain. That is why we strongly support the work of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, established by Congressional Republicans to advance the rights of persecuted peoples everywhere. It has been shunted aside by the current Administration at a time when its voice more than ever needs to be heard. Religious minorities across the Middle East are being driven from their ancient homelands, fanaticism leaves its bloody mark on both West and East Africa, and even among America’s Western friends and allies, pastors and families are penalized for their religious convictions. A Republican Administration will return the advocacy of religious liberty to a central place in our diplomacy.

America’s Generosity: International Assistance that Makes a Difference  (Top)

Americans are the most generous people in the world. Apart from the taxpayer dollars our government donates abroad, our foundations, educational institutions, faith-based groups, and committed men and women of charity devote billions of dollars and volunteer hours every year to help the poor and needy around the world. This effort, along with commercial investment from the private sector, dwarfs the results from official development assistance, most of which is based on an outdated, statist, government-to-government model, the proven breeding ground for corruption and mismanagement by foreign kleptocrats. Limiting foreign aid spending helps keep taxes lower, which frees more resources in the private and charitable sectors, whose giving tends to be more effective and efficient.

Foreign aid should serve our national interest, an essential part of which is the peaceful development of less advanced and vulnerable societies in critical parts of the world. Assistance should be seen as an alternative means of keeping the peace, far less costly in both dollars and human lives than military engagement. The economic success and political progress of former aid recipients, from Latin America to East Asia, has justified our investment in their future. U.S. aid should be based on the model of the Millennium Challenge Corporation, for which foreign governments must, in effect, compete for the dollars by showing respect for the rule of law, free enterprise, and measurable results. In short, aid money should follow positive outcomes, not pleas for more cash in the same corrupt official pockets.

The effectiveness of our foreign aid has been limited by the cultural agenda of the current Administration, attempting to impose on foreign countries, especially the peoples of Africa, legalized abortion and the homosexual rights agenda. At the same time, faith-based groups – the sector that has had the best track record in promoting lasting development – have been excluded from grants because they will not conform to the administration’s social agenda. We will reverse this tragic course, encourage more involvement by the most effective aid organizations, and trust developing peoples to build their future from the ground up.

Combating Human Trafficking  (Top)

As we approach the 150th anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation, issued by the first Republican President Abraham Lincoln, we are reminded to be vigilant against human bondage in whatever form it appears. We will use the full force of the law against those who engage in modern-day forms of slavery, including the commercial sexual exploitation of children and the forced labor of men, women, and children. Building on the accomplishments of the last Republican Administration in implementing the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, we call for increased diplomatic efforts with foreign governments to root out complicit public officials who facilitate or perpetrate this evil. We highlight the need for greater scrutiny of overseas labor contractors to prevent the imposition of usurious terms on temporary foreign workers brought to the United States. Our government must address the increasing role of vicious drug cartels and other gangs in controlling human smuggling across our southern border. The principle underlying our Megan’s Law – publicizing the identities of known offenders – should be extended to international travel in order to protect innocent children everywhere.

We affirm our country’s historic tradition of welcoming refugees from troubled lands. In some cases, they are people who stood with us during dangerous times, and they have first call on our hospitality.

Promoting a Free Marketplace of Ideas: Public Diplomacy  (Top)

International broadcasting of free and impartial information during the Cold War kept truth and hope alive in the Captive Nations. Today, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio/TV Marti do the same in other lands where freedom is unknown or endangered. We support these essential extensions of American values and culture and urge their expansion in the Middle East. Recognizing the vital role of social media in recent efforts to promote democracy, we support unrestricted access to the Internet throughout the world to advance the free marketplace of ideas.

Strengthening Ties in the Americas  (Top)

We will resist foreign influence in our hemisphere. We thereby seek not only to provide for our own security, but also to create a climate for democracy and self-determination throughout the Americas.

The current Administration has turned its back on Latin America, with predictable results. Rather than supporting our democratic allies in the region, the President has prioritized engagement with our enemies in the region. Venezuela represents an increasing threat to U.S. security, a threat which has grown much worse on the current President’s watch. In the last three years, Venezuela has become a narco-terrorist state, turning it into an Iranian outpost in the Western hemisphere. The current regime issues Venezuelan passports or visas to thousands of Middle Eastern terrorists offering safe haven to Hezbollah trainers, operatives, recruiters and fundraisers.

Alternatively, we will stand with the true democracies of the region against both Marxist subversion and the drug lords, helping them to become prosperous alternatives to the collapsing model of Venezuela and Cuba.

We affirm our friendship with the People of Cuba and look toward their reunion with the rest of our hemispheric family. The anachronistic regime in Havana which rules them is a mummified relic of the age of totalitarianism, a state-sponsor of terrorism. We reject any dynastic succession of power within the Castro family and affirm the principles codified in U.S. law as conditions for the lifting of trade, travel, and financial sanctions: the legalization of political parties, an independent media, and free and fair internationally-supervised elections. We renew our commitment to Cuba’s courageous pro-democracy movement as the protagonists of Cuba’s inevitable liberation and democratic future. We call for a dedicated platform for the transmission of Radio and TV Marti and for the promotion of Internet access and circumvention technology as tools to strengthen the pro-democracy movement. We support the work of the Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba and affirm the principles of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966, recognizing the rights of Cubans fleeing Communism.

The war on drugs and the war on terror have become a single enterprise. We salute our allies in this fight, especially the people of Mexico and Colombia. We propose a unified effort on crime and terrorism to coordinate intelligence and enforcement among our regional allies, as well as military-to-military training and intelligence sharing with Mexico, whose people are bearing the brunt of the drug cartels’ savage assault.

Our Canadian neighbors can count on our close cooperation and respect. As soon as possible, we will reverse the current Administration’s blocking of the Keystone XL Pipeline so that both our countries can profit from this vital venture and there will no need for hemispheric oil to be shipped to China.

Advancing Hope and Prosperity in Africa  (Top)

PEPFAR, President George W. Bush’s Plan for AIDS Relief, is one of the most successful global health programs in history. It has saved literally millions of lives. Along with the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, another initiative of President Bush, it represents America’s humanitarian commitment to the peoples of Africa, though these are only one aspect of our assistance to the nations of that continent. From Peace Corps volunteers teaching in one-room schools to U.S. Seabees building village projects, we will continue to strengthen the personal and commercial ties between our country and African nations.

We stand in solidarity with those African countries now under assault by the forces of radical Islam and urge other governments throughout the continent to recognize this threat to them as well. We support closer cooperation in both military and economic matters with those who are under attack by forces which seek our destruction.

U.S. Leadership in the Asian-Pacific Community  (Top)

We are a Pacific nation with economic, military, and cultural ties to all the countries of the oceanic rim, from Australia, the Philippines, and our Freely Associated States in the Pacific Islands to Japan and the Republic of Korea. With them, we look toward the restoration of human rights to the suffering people of North Korea and the fulfillment of their wish to be one in peace and freedom. The U.S. will continue to demand the complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantlement of North Korea’s nuclear weapons programs with a full accounting of its proliferation activities.

We celebrate the political and economic development of most of the nations of Southeast Asia. Their example of material progress through hard work and free enterprise, in tandem with greater democracy should encourage their less fortunate neighbors to set aside crippling ideologies and embrace a more humane future. While our relations with Vietnam have improved, and U.S. investment is welcomed, we need unceasing efforts to obtain an accounting for, and repatriation of the remains of, Americans who gave their lives in the cause of Vietnamese freedom. We cannot overlook the continued repression of human rights and religious freedom, as well as retribution against ethnic minorities and others who assisted U.S. forces during the conflict there.

South Asia  (Top)

We welcome a stronger relationship with the world’s largest democracy, India, both economic and cultural, as well as in terms of national security. We hereby affirm and declare that India is our geopolitical ally and a strategic trading partner. We encourage India to permit greater foreign investment and trade. We urge protection for adherents of all India’s religions. Both as Republicans and as Americans, we note with pride the contributions to this country that are being made by our fellow citizens of Indian ancestry. The aftermath of the last decade’s conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has put enormous pressure on the political and military infrastructure of Pakistan, which faces both internal terrorism and external dangers. The working relationship between our two countries is a necessary, though sometimes difficult, benefit to both, and we look toward the renewal of historic ties that have frayed under the weight of international conflict.

The imminent withdrawal from Afghanistan of the 30,000 “surge” troops sent there two years ago comes weeks before this year’s presidential election and against the advice of the current President’s top military commanders. Future decisions by a Republican President will never subordinate military necessity to domestic politics or an artificial timetable. Afghans, Pakistanis, and Americans have a common interest in ridding the region of the Taliban and other insurgent groups, but we cannot expect others to remain resolute unless we show the same determination ourselves. We will expect the Afghan government to crackdown on corruption, respect free elections, and assist our fight against the narcotic trade that fuels the insurgency. We must likewise expect the Pakistan government to sever any connection between its security and intelligence forces and the insurgents. No Pakistani citizen should be punished for helping the United States against the terrorists.

Taiwan  (Top)

We salute the people of Taiwan, a sound democracy and economic model for mainland China. Our relations must continue to be based upon the provisions of the Taiwan Relations Act. America and Taiwan are united in our shared belief in fair elections, personal liberty, and free enterprise. We oppose any unilateral steps by either side to alter the status quo in the Taiwan Straits on the principle that all issues regarding the island’s future must be resolved peacefully, through dialogue, and be agreeable to the people of Taiwan. If China were to violate those principles, the U.S., in accord with the Taiwan Relations Act, will help Taiwan defend itself. We praise steps taken by both sides of the Taiwan Strait to reduce tension and strengthen economic ties. As a loyal friend of America, Taiwan has merited our strong support, including free trade agreements status, as well as the timely sale of defensive arms and full participation in the World Health Organization, International Civil Aviation Organization, and other multilateral institutions.

China  (Top)

We will welcome the emergence of a peaceful and prosperous China, and we will welcome even more the development of a democratic China. Its rulers have discovered that economic freedom leads to national wealth. The next lesson is that political and religious freedom leads to national greatness. The exposure of the Chinese people to our way of life can be the greatest force for change in their country. We should make it easier for the people of China to experience our vibrant democracy and to see for themselves how freedom works. We welcome the increase in trade and education alliances with the U.S. and the opening of Chinese markets to American companies.

The Chinese government has engaged in a number of activities that we condemn: China’s pursuit of advanced military capabilities without any apparent need; suppression of human rights in Tibet, Xinjiang, and other areas; religious persecution; a barbaric one-child policy involving forced abortion; the erosion of democracy in Hong Kong; and its destabilizing claims in the South China Sea. Our serious trade disputes, especially China’s failure to enforce international standards for the protection of intellectual property and copyrights, as well as its manipulation of its currency, call for a firm response from a new Republican Administration.

Europe  (Top)

The West has been the bulwark of democracy and freedom, providing hope and faith to the oppressed around the globe. Our historic ties to the peoples of Europe have been based on shared culture and values, common interests and goals. Their endurance cannot be taken for granted, especially in light of the continent’s economic upheaval and demographic changes. Ensuring the continued vitality of our political alliance with Europe through NATO will require effort and understanding on both sides of the Atlantic. We honor our special relationship with the United Kingdom and appreciate its staunch support for our fight against terrorism worldwide. We thank the several other nations of Europe which have contributed to a united effort in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. Their sacrifice will not soon be forgotten. We are heartened by the ongoing reconciliation in Northern Ireland and hopeful that its success might be replicated in Cyprus.

Russia  (Top)

The heroism – and the suffering – of the people of Russia over the last century demand the world’s respect. As our allies in their Great Patriotic War, they lost 28 million fighting Nazism. As our allies in spirit, they ended the Soviet terror that had consumed so many millions more. They deserve our admiration and support as they now seek to reestablish their rich national identity. We do have common imperatives: ending terrorism, combating nuclear proliferation, promoting trade, and more. To advance those causes, we urge the leaders of their government to reconsider the path they have been following: suppression of opposition parties, the press, and institutions of civil society; unprovoked invasion of the Republic of Georgia, alignment with tyrants in the Middle East; and bullying their neighbors while protecting the last Stalinist regime in Belarus. The Russian people deserve better, as we look to their full participation in the ranks of modern democracies.

Russia should be granted Permanent Normal Trade Relations, but not without sanctions on Russian officials who have used the government to violate human rights. We support enactment of the Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act as a condition of expanded trade relations with Russia.

Our Unequivocal Support of Israel  (Top)

Israel and the United States are part of the great fellowship of democracies who speak the same language of freedom and justice, and the right of every person to live in peace. The security of Israel is in the vital national security interest of the United States; our alliance is based not only on shared interests, but also shared values. We affirm our unequivocal commitment to Israel’s security and will ensure that it maintains a qualitative edge in military technology over any potential adversaries. We support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state with secure, defensible borders; and we envision two democratic states – Israel with Jerusalem as its capital and Palestine – living in peace and security. For that to happen, the Palestinian people must support leaders who reject terror, embrace the institutions and ethos of democracy, and respect the rule of law. We call on Arab governments throughout the region to help advance that goal. Israel should not be expected to negotiate with entities pledged to her destruction. We call on the new government in Egypt to fully uphold its peace treaty with Israel.

The U.S. seeks a comprehensive and lasting peace in the Middle East, negotiated between the parties themselves with the assistance of the U.S., without the imposition of an artificial timetable. Essential to that process will be a just, fair, and realistic framework for dealing with the issues that can be settled on the basis of mutually agreed changes reflecting today’s realities as well as tomorrow’s hopes.

The Challenges of a Changing Middle East  (Top)

We recognize the historic nature of the events of the past two years – the Arab Spring – that have unleashed democratic movements leading to the overthrow of dictators who have been menaces to global security for decades. In a season of upheaval, it is necessary to be prepared for anything. That is true on the ground in the Middle East, and it will be equally true in the next Administration, particularly with a new President unbound by the failures of the past. We welcome the aspirations of the Arab peoples and others for greater freedom, and we hope that greater liberty – and with it, a greater chance for peace – will result from the recent turmoil. Many governments in the region have given substantial assistance to the U.S. over the last decade because they understood that our struggle against terror is not an ethnic or religious fight, and that violent extremists are abusers of their faith, not its champions.

On the other hand, radical elements like Hamas and Hezbollah must be isolated because they do not meet the standards of peace and diplomacy of the international community. We call for the restoration of Lebanon’s independence, which those groups have virtually destroyed. We support the transition to a post-Assad Syrian government that is representative of its people, protects the rights of all minorities and religions, respects the territorial integrity of its neighbors, and contributes to peace and stability in the region. We offer a continuing partnership with the people of Iraq, who have endured extremist terror to now have a chance to build their own security and democracy. We urge special efforts to preserve and protect the ethnic and religious diversity of their nation.

Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons capability threatens America, Israel, and the world. That threat has only become worse during the current Administration. A continuation of its failed engagement policy with Iran will lead to nuclear cascade. In solidarity with the international community, America must lead the effort to prevent Iran from building and possessing nuclear weapons capability. We express our respect for the people of Iran, who seek peace and aspire to freedom. Their current regime is unworthy of them. It exports terror and provided weapons that killed our troops in Iraq. We affirm the unanimous resolution of the U.S. Senate calling for “elections that are free, fair, and meet international standards” and “a representative and responsive democratic government that respects human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law.” We urge the next Republican President to unequivocally assert his support for the Iranian people as they protest their despotic regime. We must retain all options in dealing with a situation that gravely threatens our security, our interests, and the safety of our friends.

Stars01.gif picture by kempite

The Platform Committee

Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus

Chairman Governor Bob McDonnell

Co-Chairmen Senator John Hoeven Congressman Marsha Blackburn

Subcommittee Chairs

Restoring the American Dream: Rebuilding the Economy and Creating Jobs Co-Chairman Jonathan Barnett Co-Chairman Lynn Fitch Co-Chairman Andy Puzder

We The People: A Restoration of Constitutional Government Co-Chairman Jim Bopp Co-Chairman Jane Timken

America’s Natural Resources: Energy,Agriculture and the Environment Co-Chairman Mary Dye Co-Chairman Ed Whitfield

Reforming Government to Serve the People Co-Chairman Jim Cawley Co-Chairman Rachel Kemp

Renewing American Values to Build Healthy Families,Great Schools and Safe Neighborhoods Co-Chairman Tom Luna Co-Chairman Carolyn McLarty Co-Chairman Sam Olens

American Exceptionalism Co-Chairman Donna Cain Co-Chairman Jim Talent

Committee Members

Alabama: Jacqueline Curtiss Cam Ward

Alaska: Ric Davidge Debbie Joslin

American Samoa: Salote Schuster Brandon Smart

Arizona: Kip Kempton Heather Sandstrom

Arkansas: Jonathan Barnett Julie Harris

California: Andrew Puzder Audra Strickland

Colorado: Suzanne Sharkey Guy Short

Connecticut: L. Scott Frantz Themis Klarides

Delaware: Ruth Briggs King John Sigler

District of Columbia: Teri Galvez Edward Newton

Florida: Allen Bense Remedios Diaz

Georgia: Sue Everhart Sam Olens

Guam: Arthur Boyd Clark Telo Taitague

Hawaii: Lynne Hansen Philip Hellreich

Idaho: Gayann DeMordaunt Tom Luna

Illinois: Steve Kim Sharee Langenstein

Indiana: James Bopp Jr. Deborah Fleming

Iowa: Gopal T.K. Krishna Kimberly Lehman

Kansas: Beverly Caley Kris Kobach

Kentucky: Ed Whitfield Shirley Wiseman

Louisiana: Ambia Baker Tony Perkins

Maine: Linda Bean Mike Wallace

Maryland: Christian Cavey Kathy Szeliga

Massachusetts: Jay Barrows Rachel Kemp

Michigan: Krista Haroutunian Norm Shinkle

Minnesota: Kevin Erickson Juliette Jordal

Mississippi: Lynn Fitch Delbert Hosemann

Missouri: Phyllis Schlafly Jim Talent

Montana: Mark Baker Tamara Hall

Nebraska: Brian Buescher Darlene Starman

Nevada: Cynthia Kennedy Pat Kerby

New Hampshire: David Boutin Beverly Bruce

New Jersey: Aubrey Fenton Lynda Pagliughi

New Mexico: James Damron Rocky Galassini

New York: John Cahill Adele Malpass

North Carolina: Wayne King Mary Summa

North Dakota: Kyle Handegard Paul Henderson

Northern Mariana Islands: Ellsbeth Alepuyo Juan Diego Blanco

Ohio: Clarence Mingo Jane Timken

Oklahoma: Anthony Lauinger Carolyn McLarty

Oregon: Donna Cain Russ Walker

Pennsylvania: Jim Cawley Joyce Haas

Puerto Rico: Jorge San Miguel Vanessa Viera

Rhode Island: Barbara Ann Fenton Richard Ford

South Carolina: Randy Page LaDonna Ryggs

South Dakota: Mary Jean Jensen Dana Randall

Tennessee: Marsha Blackburn Chris Devaney

Texas: David Barton Denise McNamara

Utah: Margaret Dayton Brad Dee

Vermont: Rick Cochran Darcie Johnston

Virginia: Chris Stearns Kathy Terry

Virgin Islands: April Newland Herbert Schoenbohm

Washington: Mary Dye Lew Moore

West Virginia: Conrad Lucas II

Wisconsin: Daniel Feyen Susan Lynch

Wyoming: Cynthia Cloud Dan Dockstader

Platform Staff

Ben Key, Executive Director Elise Stefanik, Policy Director Bill Gribbin, Editor Gracey Roskam, Executive Assistant Bob Dove, Parliamentarian Laura Dove, Clerk Jeff Rosen, Counsel Tim Flanigan, Counsel Kirsten Kukowski, Press Secretary Gary Howard, Press Secretary Leslie Rutledge, RNC Associate Counsel Jon Waclawski, RNC Advisor and Associate Counsel Karen Portik, Graphic Designer Marcia Brown, Production

Administrative Team: Gregg Edgar, Brian O’Malley, Mallory Loring

Court Reporter: Raymond Heer III, Alderson Court Reporting

Policy Staff

Economy Subcommittee Andrew Olmem Matt Weidinger

Restoring Constitutional Government Ed Corrigan William Henderson Billy Gribbin

Energy Subcommittee Tony Eberhard Mary Neumayr

Government Reform Subcommittee George Fishman Jonathan Slemrod

Health, Education & Crime Cynthia Herrle Mike O’Rielly Keith Studdard

National Security Subcommittee Neil Bradley Robert Wilkie

Special thanks to the following for their valuable insights:

Former Executive Directors: Ambassador John Bolton, 1984; William Martin, 1992; Judy VanRest, 1996; Mitch Bainwol, 2000; Anne Phelps, 2004; Steven Duffield, 2008

Former Policy Director: Candi Wolff, 2000

Senior Advisors: Tony Feather, James Tobin, Brian Noyes

Special thanks to:

Betsy Ankney, Sara Armstrong, Julia Biebighauser, Tyler Brown, Britt Carter, Brittany Cohan, Cesar deGuzman, Sharon Day, Dirk Eyman, Mike Gilding, Wells Griffith, Bill Harris, Anne Hathaway, Rebecca Heilig, Aly Higgins, Colleen House, Mark Isaacson, Bettina Inclain, Jeff Larson, Jeremy Kenney, Tom Kise, Tory Maguire, James Min, Johanna Persing, Joe Pounder, Ryan Price, Matt Sauvage, Tim Schigel, Sean Spicer, Elizabeth Steil, Bill Steiner, Christine Samuelian, Matt Terrill, Jennifer Voldness, Rick Wiley, Larissa Ziemann and all our volunteers.

Stars01.gif picture by kempite

Click here to view the 2008 Republican Platform

177 Responses

  1. Katy, on June 2, 2011 at 1:13 pm said:

    hi.

    Reply
    • Tom, on August 23, 2012 at 10:51 am said:

      This platform is pretty watered down. They really don’t go into the true detail of tax policy and re definition of social policies. I think that they need to write it so that it spells out what is really going to happen. I am disappointed to see such a foggy document.

      Reply
      • Kempite, on August 23, 2012 at 4:49 pm said:

        Actually Tom, I can understand that you might be diaspaoointed in not finding any detail regarding tax policy and social policies in the 2008 platform. But if you understood that platforms are suppose to create a general guidline for policies, than you would understand that you do not look for details in a platform. Party platforms are simply the foundation for which the details are built on. Now given that purpose I would suggest that the 2008 republican platform that you are reffering to, serves its purpose quite well and the 2012 platform will do the same. Now if you want details, I suggest you vist Romney’s website where you will find those details regarding his trax policies and plan as well as his positions on the social issues.

        Reply
      • R J Bruno, on September 8, 2012 at 11:31 am said:

        They present a view and goal, but knowing there are many ideas, leave it open for debate. Or would you rather have the way obama does it; no talk, all executive orders?

        Reply
    • Marilyn Joan Murphy, on August 27, 2012 at 9:24 pm said:

      I am a Republican, registering in KS and living the past 25 years in AZ, so I was interested to review the platform with the convention ready to start. I am not a tea party member like one of my siblings, nor an “independent” like another, just a moderate conservative and a proud American citizen. Unfortunately, I consider most of the retoric in the platform to be just that—statements designed to pander to the most extreme members of MY party. Oh for the good old Goldwater days when we believed in personal decision making and responsibility, and didn’t want government telling us how to live our lives on every level! Joanie

      Reply
      • Kempite, on August 27, 2012 at 9:43 pm said:

        Oh well. I guess your first mistake is assuming that its all rhetorical. Perhaps its time for you to change your registration and become a Green Party member. Perhaps you’ll be more content with their rhetoric.

        Reply
    • Paul, on September 6, 2012 at 12:58 am said:

      to do better would be a shot across the bow of the socialist plan ! a heavy repel of regs ,nationalization of the federal reserve and most of all federal land given to the states and kick out the u.n. out …stop all human sacrifice to a pagan god aka abortion etc end the income tax on the people …..

      Reply
    • amy, on September 6, 2012 at 9:29 am said:

      i vote romney

      Reply
  2. Katy, on June 2, 2011 at 1:15 pm said:

    I strongly agree. I have been a Republican for 40 years and am 100% on the right wing.

    Reply
  3. Jeff Sheets, on September 27, 2011 at 4:34 pm said:

    As a lifelong conservative I am concerned that freedom and privacy must take a backseat to security. The Patriot act and corresponding terrorism laws are taking us down the garden path to an unintended world where we will have neither freedom, nor privacy, nor security. It is time to protect private citizens’ personal privacy rights from exploitation by Internet, government, business, and medical/research.

    Secondly, recreational drug prohibition is creating a narco-terrorist state out of Mexico, and though I applaud the GOP efforts to enforce our borders and reduce crime, efforts to do so will remain ineffectual until we remove the enticement to create black markets and gang power. Spend that money on rehabilitation and prevention, rather than interdiction and prisons. Repealing prohibition was correct at the turn of the last century and it it is still right. Make laws that equate alcohol misuse with recreational drug misuse and let society work it out.

    Thirdly, though I believe that a fair and flat tax is an improvement over the current system, a flat tax is ineffectual unless it equally taxes big business, recreational drugs, financial institutions, religious organizations, political organizations, and unions; in addition to private citizens. It is time to level the playing field and set an example for the rest of the world.

    Finally, Accountability – Severely limit the ability of government agencies to keep nonmilitary secrets from the public, and strengthen the Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment to force Congress and all government agencies to LITERALLY abide by ALL the laws they pass; And to make them accountable for breaking those laws, same as any private citizen. Again, level the playing field and eliminate special rights of the elite.

    Mankind may never progress unless we reassert our god-given rights to freedom in this time of accelerating change, and set the bar for the rest of the world.

    Reply
    • MACK WHEELER, on June 12, 2012 at 5:19 pm said:

      AMEN !!!!! WELL SAID JEFF SHEETS !!!!

      Reply
    • Tigre57, on August 28, 2012 at 1:36 pm said:

      Well said Jeff. Only thing I would add is to get the Federal Govt out of our schools. Do away with the Dept of Education, it is a useless agency. Individual states should decide how their schools are run and what ciriculum is taught.

      Reply
      • Kempite, on August 28, 2012 at 1:53 pm said:

        Unfortunately the opinions here regarding the Patriot Act are based on the misinformation proliferated by Pauliacs and liberals who are intentionally misinformation and false characterizing the patriot Act. The offer arguments that view the Patriot Act with references to “excessive powers granted to federal authorities” and “overreaching.” The fact is, those sections of the Patriot Act generating the greatest outcry are those that simply give law enforcement the benefit of the same tools in the war on terrorism that they have long had in the war on crime.

        For example, the media vociferously point to the Patriot Act as a means by which government agents can now review our library records. Yet, long before enactment of the Patriot Act, library records have been subpoenaed and used in criminal prosecutions when such evidence would be relevant to the crime being investigated.

        In 1996, a federal grand jury subpoenaed library records in the investigation of the Unabomber. Library records were subpoenaed to crack the case against Gianni Versace’s murderer in 1997. Here in Washington state, library records were used to gather critical evidence against Stella Nickel, convicted in 1988 of poisoning her husband and another woman with cyanide-tainted medications. The power to subpoena records of any kind, including library records, business records or financial records, has been a longstanding and fundamental resource in law enforcement’s ability to investigate and prosecute criminal conduct.

        Why, then, should law enforcement be denied this fundamental tool in its investigation and prosecution of terrorism? Terrorism is, after all, the ultimate form of criminal conduct. Section 215 of the Patriot Act simply gives the government the ability to obtain business records and other tangible things pursuant to an order from the federal Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court. Ironically, as of March 30, the Patriot Act authority has never been used to request library records. However, the authority to do so is critical, just as the authority to subpoena other kinds of records is critical to law enforcement’s efforts.

        Critics of the Patriot Act also point to the “sneak and peek” searches authorized in Section 213 to conjure up images of excessive federal powers. In essence, delayed notification searches authorize federal agents to conduct a search, after getting a federal search warrant signed by a federal judge, without having to give immediate notification to the target of the investigation. Such delayed notification is permitted when good reason is shown, and when a federal judge authorizes it.

        Once again, these kinds of delayed-notice searches have been allowed by courts in criminal prosecutions for decades. They were used, for example, in building the case against Mafia don John Gotti. They have been upheld as constitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. They are nothing new. They are used primarily in cases in which the criminal conduct is long-term, multifaceted and involves many targets. Some of the targets may be unidentified. These are precisely the characteristics we would expect in terrorist operations in this country.

        The Patriot Act simply permits use of this longstanding tool in cases involving terrorism. As such, under the act, a federal judge can authorize temporarily delaying notice of a search if notice could result in danger to an individual, the destruction of evidence or seriously jeopardize an investigation. Clearly, as law enforcement tries to identify and protect against terror plots, this is an essential means by which to investigate terrorists, their operations and their intentions.

        Moreover, since its enactment through Jan. 31 of this year, the Department of Justice has requested only 155 delayed-notice search warrants. That amounts to less than one-fifth of 1 percent of the more than 77,000 search warrants obtained by the department during this time period.

        Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has already supported some clarifications in the act. One change will make it clear that anyone receiving a Patriot Act order (a request for records, for example) may consult with his attorney and challenge the order in court. Additionally, Gonzales supports explicit language that the government will seek, and the court require, only the production of records that are relevant to a national-security investigation. This creates a similar standard to the one that applies to grand-jury subpoenas in criminal cases.

        Even critics of the Patriot Act agree that it has helped remove a “wall” between law enforcement and intelligence communities. Getting rid of this wall means investigators can now work together and more productively uncover terrorist plots before they claim innocent lives.

        This is a good result.

        For years, law enforcement has used court-approved tools to go after the mob, drug traffickers, gangs and other criminals. The Patriot Act allows use of those same court-approved tools to go after terrorists.

        Those are the facts andn if one is willing to base their opinions of the Patriot Act on facts and not the disengenuous partisan political rhetoric of irresponsible, Kool Aid drinking Ron Paul supporters or lunatic Nancy Pelosi fans, than they would understand that the Patriot Act is neccessary, constitutional tool in the plight to defend Americans from terrorism and to preserve liberty and justice for all.

        Reply
      • Amused., on August 30, 2012 at 11:56 am said:

        Well said, Tigre57. We should also leave it to the individual States to determine how “curriculum” ought to be spelled.

        Reply
  4. Debbie, on October 7, 2011 at 12:31 pm said:

    My dad is a republican and I was reading through this to see what the republican party is all about. I completely agree with all of this, its only too bad I wont be able to vote until 2014 when I turn 18! I hope you win!

    Reply
    • Lisa, on April 7, 2012 at 3:08 pm said:

      You poor child! If you read it, and agree with it, you obviously don’t understand it. Nobody should ever say, “well my dad was, or my mother was, or my grandfather was.” You need to educate yourself and make up your own mind and not on a political website which slants the most frightful statements into sweet drops of sugary goo which sound so nice it must be something good. Look up topics or things you read here on non-political websites if you want to get anything close to the truth. Still don’t understand? Several times in this platform you see the term “empower or empowerment of the individual”. Do know what that means?…you better be able to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps if you’ve suffered a setback or are in need, cause we got nothin’ for ya!

      Reply
      • stan, on April 17, 2012 at 3:19 am said:

        Lisa, you are the “poor child!” You liberals always believe it is someone else’s job to fit the bill for you. This is a wise young lady who wants to be a productive person in society! HOW TERRIBLE! I work with the Welfare Dept. and see all the corruption and waste of those who refuse to work for a living and abuse the system while taking advantage of hard working folks who sacrifice for them while they do not show up for work because it is cold, hot, or just too lazy to get out of bed! YES! THAT HAPPENS IN MOST OF THE CASES I HAVE SEEN!!!!! Republicans are not against helping those who are truly in need, we just do not believe it is our responsibly to make a way for another person who is capable of making it for themselves! We must us our own gifts, educate ourselves, get or create a job, and be productive in society! So before you give suggestions to this young lady, know the facts first hand and do not give advise to find the truth off websites! You GO, Debbie, people like you are what is going to turn this country around from impending bankruptcy to a country that takes care of oneself and then aids truly needy others.

        Reply
        • B.W. MaGurk, on August 28, 2012 at 10:17 am said:

          Get a grip Stan. Have another glass of that Kool-Aid you’re drinking. What the woman said, in essence, was doubt everything.
          “If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things”. Rene Descartes

          I cannot think of better advice to give the young man.

          Reply
        • Maggie Donnelly, on August 30, 2012 at 3:55 pm said:

          Stan, you forgot to tell us what you don’t like about the way Lisa looks. And oh Stan, you work for the government…for the most part I would venture to say you are way over paid for what you do. And, who will it be who decides who is “truly in need?” You? Oh yeah, that’s your job already, silly me.
          And it seems to me that it was the Bush administration that let the Clinton welfare reform measures lapse,

          Reply
          • Patricia L. Oswalt, on September 4, 2012 at 11:00 pm said:

            Don’t assume everyone who works for the government is overpaid. If that were true, I wouldn’t be trying so hard to find a job in the private sector. It’s crap money unless you are an elected official or one of their pets.

        • yourstupid69, on September 6, 2012 at 3:18 pm said:

          your stupid she needs to know the issues before she just says she understands…shes still to young. she needs to go on her own thoughts not her parents or familys.

          Reply
          • AC SEvy, on November 1, 2012 at 10:39 pm said:

            While each person does need to know the issues, when a person hears or reads good ideas that person can understand and agree.

            All of us start with our parents. From there we, and she, will begin to develop our/her own thoughts. Each person must study and ponder how something works to discover whether the outcome is productive or unproductive, good or bad. Doubt everything? I don’t know. Question everything? I agree with that. We can question with faith, which is confidence, hope and belief.

      • arkady967, on July 4, 2012 at 9:47 am said:

        “You poor child! If you read it, and agree with it, you obviously don’t understand it.”

        How arrogant to insist that someone doesn’t understand what they read if you don’t like what they read.

        Reply
      • nevadansagainstgarbage, on September 3, 2012 at 2:30 am said:

        Lisa I just reviewed the 2008 Democratic platform (all 59 pages) and found 12 references to empowerment. Which meaning of empowerment do you prefer “to give somebody power or authority” or “to give somebody a greater sense of confidence or self-esteem”? I believe your response to Ms. Debbie was trite and disrespectful. It is really a shame when one disagrees with another and resorts to degrading language instead of being constructive in their dialogue.
        Ms. Debbie said she read the platform and agrees with it entirely. Why should she go to a non political website and have to sort through someone else’s analysis of what this document says? This is akin to voting for a candidate on the basis of what they say rather than their record and how they have voted on issues that matter to me.
        My only suggestion to Ms. Debbie is that she might consider reading through the 2008 Democratic platform and see how much she agrees with and how well the platform has been adhered to over the last three and a half years.

        Reply
      • Renee, on September 7, 2012 at 10:28 am said:

        Exactly…WE pull ourselves up by our bootstraps with the help of our family and friends! We take reponsibility! The government wants control and they do that with the almighty dollar. WAKE UP!

        Reply
    • Ray Gillies, on August 21, 2012 at 3:39 pm said:

      If you strongly agree with this you are too young to vote. You need to experience the world some and find out what the hate,fear and intolerance the right espouses is all about. Visit some sites like Freerepublic. see what this is really about.

      Reply
  5. Boscoe, on October 19, 2011 at 11:30 am said:

    “From the time of Lincoln, equality of individuals has been a cornerstone of the Republican Party.” …except for blacks, native americans and women until recently, atheist, gays and the 25 million plus americans without health care…

    “Today’s Democratic Party views the tax code as a tool for social engineering. They use it to control our behavior, steer our choices, and change the way we live our lives. ” …oh, bless their little christian hearts for not imposing their believes on me.

    Reply
    • Debbie, on October 19, 2011 at 12:35 pm said:

      Some might be offended by this but I understand it and it’s cool.

      Reply
    • Kerry, on January 18, 2012 at 11:04 am said:

      Ah Boscoe, and man after my own heart! I just used this exact same quote to put forth the same point, adding that the right wing use religion in the same way they say we use the tax code!

      Reply
  6. Debbie, on October 19, 2011 at 12:34 pm said:

    I agree with this platform. My dad has been a republican for at least 20+ years, and I plan on being one once I register.

    Reply
  7. Jayleen, on October 26, 2011 at 4:10 pm said:

    We believe all races are equal and are fully capable of charting their own course. That’s the difference between Republicans and Democrats, Democrats don’t see these people as capable, so they buy their votes with handouts. Handouts only enslave people and prevent them from getting out of poverty. Every single city that has been controlled by Democrats for the last 50 years is now in shambles. Do your own homework and find out the truth of what happens to cities controlled by Democrats.

    Blacks and Native Americans are among the poorest of the population because Democrats control them with handouts. Look at what is happened to these communities and you will see proof positive that handouts do not work. They need to be empowered and help to understand that education, hard work and ingenuity is the path to both freedom and prosperity. And they are smart and capable and can make it on their own if they would stop being fed the message that they can’t make it on their own and that they need handouts to do nothing.

    Reply
  8. Abigail, on December 20, 2011 at 11:32 pm said:

    I see things to like, but am amazed at the amount of creeping socialism. We’re supposed to help eachother—not pay the government do it. Time to revisit the Constitution and back out of the non-enumerated roles of federal government: housing, agriculture, welfare, energy, education, etc. And especially health! Federal taxation should be going for none of this. Leave it to the free market and private enterprise.

    Reply
    • AC SEvy, on November 1, 2012 at 11:04 pm said:

      Right on target, Abigail. It was the Democratic presidents, especially FDR who brought in so many of the federal agencies. Hollywood was behind it at that time, too. If you watch some of the old movies you will see how the man from Washington, the Federal agent, the G-man (Gov’t-man) so often was relied upon to save the day when the people themselves were helpless.

      You may have heard of the “Alphabet soup agencies” established in the “New Deal” era of FDR. When America needed a hand up, Washington, not to miss out on a good crisis, taxed the rich and started giving to the poor. The mantra was, “Tax, Tax, Spend, Spend, Elect, Elect”, or “get elected again and again”.

      Reply
  9. emerson e. archbold, on December 21, 2011 at 9:56 am said:

    I was a registered Republican for about 50 years Ronald Regan was
    one sorry president,and it has gotten even worse since his time.
    Bush,Cheney and there gang,should be serving time in priison for
    the damage they did to this country.
    Boehner & Cantor are complete idiots along with there followers.
    Fox news,Rupert Murdocks,conservative propaganda machine,
    brain washes a lot of the country,mentally disturbed fools like
    Hannity,O’Reilly and others spread there biased crap daily.
    Your party has turned this country into socialized welfare
    dictatorship,catering to the wealthy.
    What happened of the people by the people for the people!!!

    Reply
    • Kempite, on December 21, 2011 at 11:45 am said:

      Are you expecting your comment to be taken seriously? If you are, I would suggest that you crack open a history book and get your facts staright.

      While you may have been a Republican five decades ago, I have not yet lived that long but I can tell you that in my lifetime, Americans have lived lives that werre much more prosperous, and had far more security under every Republican President we have had than under any Democrat we had. That goes for the current socialist-liberal extremist occupying the Oval office. I would also suggest that if you believe that the G.O.P. has been the Party moving our nation down a path of socialism and dependency on government through social welfare programs, then you should see a doctor. Perhaps you are suffering from Alzhiemers. The way I see it, liberal democrats have expanded the welfare state with every chance they had and they have created a culture of dependency that is leaving our nation in a moral and financial deficit that is destorying the very essence of freedom which founded our nation.

      And as for comparing congressional leaders….Really? Do you really want to compare Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, to Boehener and McConnell? If you do, you are one extremely ignorant man.

      Reply
      • Mark1986, on March 10, 2012 at 5:08 pm said:

        Kempite,

        I truly love people such as yourself. I am a swing voter. I am here to tell you. You have a persuasive ability I have not seen in many. The problem, however, is you stray far from fact. Recently, 46 out of the 50 states expanded welfare and Medicaid coverage. This means Democrats and Republicans both expanded these programs. Perhaps it is you who should read a history book. The Republicans have always stood for wealth. I won’t even bother replying to your answer. You are persuasive, as I said. But you alter the truth and twist it to fit your beliefs. This is called belief armor. Regardless of what you want to believe, the Republicans are as corrupt as the Democrats. Swing voters use both sides to maintain control of both parties. The only institution safe from swing voting, at least once elected, is the Executive Branch. Presidents almost always serve two terms. Go out and drive your Lexus and BMW and let those of us who are younger and make less drive our vehicles. Your party has repeatedly disenfranchised; Blacks, Hispanics, women, the impoverished, and the youth ages 18 to 30. I will qualify this statement by saying those minorities and youth who come from the right families are accepted by your party. Along this line, these groups all have one thing in common. These groups all make up a majority of the bottom 60 percent of society in income and wealth. In case you missed it, I just twisted the truth the same way you have. By starting with a truth about disenfranchisement and making a false statement about income inequality. This was a generalization without qualification. Just like when you paired Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, and Boehner and McConnell. Boehner and McConnell are not quite equal. Boehner is a northern Republican, and McConnell is a southern Republican. Two very different group, even though the groups are within the same party and often vote together. There is a divergence on beliefs. These groups vote together so the party isn’t weakened by division, like the Democratic party is. The Democratic party is weaker than the Republican party because the Democratic party allows people in who diverge from the party line voting. I would not make the mistake you have, which is to believe you can group the people within a party into a generalized group with the same beliefs. Democrats run on the ticket because there is an agreement on most beliefs with the Democrats. Same with Republicans. I do not assault you, only point out differences between you and myself. And I do not believe in fairness. Only a naive blowhard, who takes himself or herself way too seriously and attacks everyone who disagrees with himself or herself could hold such a belief. There I go again. I just can’t help making inaccurate statements.

        Reply
      • Dennis, on May 7, 2012 at 2:00 pm said:

        “Americans have lived lives that werre [sic] much more prosperous and had far more security under every Republican President we have had than under any Democrat we [have] had.”

        Pop quiz: Under which President did 9/11 occur?
        Pop quiz: Under which President did we achieve a balanced budget and a financial surplus?

        Before you make sweeping generalizations make sure that you are not, in fact, completely wrong.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on May 7, 2012 at 2:38 pm said:

          Shit head. Which President found himself with a balanced budget budget only after a Republican controlled House and Senate forced it upon him?

          Which President made the decision to not take out Osama bin Laden when the CIA begged for the go ahead?

          Before you use Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher as your fact checkers, get a brain and deal with the facts, not the distortions.

          Reply
      • joseph hugh o'brien, on August 22, 2012 at 3:15 pm said:

        hey … kempite … do you enjoy name calling or being a bully … anything good or substantial has happened under a liberal democrats watch … we won world war two and world war one … we exited a bogus war in iraq under our current president … veterans have done better under democrats … your right wing reality is at best skewed at worst drug induced delusional … reagan was the beginning of the worst possible ideology … what you think has been prosperity is nothing more than legalized criminal activity … that’s all the right is today along with being afraid of gays and women and minorities and the poor … so stop parading your personal ignorance and stupidity and self imposed superiority … if we are close to a civil war the right would definitely be wearing the grey of the south and if so then you know that the union will win again …

        Reply
        • joseph hugh o'brien, on August 22, 2012 at 3:23 pm said:

          also unlike you chicken hawks i use my real name … i was am and always will be a marine ready to fight … too bad many of you on the right only talk the talk … pretty much cowards who make up excuses for secrecy and act belligerent until you are confronted face to face …

          Reply
          • Kempite, on August 23, 2012 at 12:20 am said:

            Shithead…..the name is Anthony Del Pellegrino….if you knew how to read, you would see that it is identified plain as day, you ignorant ass.

        • Kempite, on August 23, 2012 at 12:18 am said:

          Joey, You seen to be allegric to facts. I suggest you see a doctor and take something for it because it is making you sound like a retartded Occupy protester. And if you don’t the responses you get….Get off my site! It’s that’s easy.

          Reply
      • Tom, on August 27, 2012 at 8:51 am said:

        Kempite,
        You are absolutely wrong. After WWII, America prospered under liberal policies. It wasn’t until Reagan that the middle class began to see lower wages and less influence in the affairs of government. After Reagan big business and the very rich began to run the country for their benefit only.
        Secondly, stop the nonsense about liberals causing people to be dependent. The rich are dependent on themselves. A rich person helps another rich person. This is how they get ahead.
        Spending on helping people who are poor and uneducated is a small 10% of the national spending. The national programs have done more to help the poor advance than any nonsense from the republican party.

        Reply
    • Mary Ann Sealey, on July 22, 2012 at 6:48 pm said:

      You are right on target, Mr Archbold!!!!

      Reply
    • AC SEvy, on November 2, 2012 at 12:19 am said:

      Mr. Emerson has made some excellent points here, after which comes some foul mouthed, hair-brained “conservative” who makes rude comments, disgusting suggestions and mostly plain stupid statements. The name is “Kempite”.

      This Kempite person may very well be a sabateur of this website. Posing as a Republican conservative commenting against progressive, liberal Democrats, this person succeeds in offending just about every common-sense person who writes here. I’m certain this person will comment profanely and offensively regarding this post.

      All you well-intentioned readers, beware. Very few conservative Republicans are as repulsive as Kempite.

      Reply
  10. emerson e. archbold, on December 21, 2011 at 9:36 pm said:

    i;m the 83 year old ignorant man,retired army,spent 3 years at
    NSA,coulld not stand the wast of time & money.
    My experiences in live includes woking on farms,service stations
    restaurants,driving cab,selling real,estate & cars & driving truck.
    Since 1961 I have specalized on oil fired furnaces & boilers,service
    and installation, during that time,did work for farm coop.several
    oil companies,prince william co.&fairfax co. va. schools,last 21
    years,run my own business.
    I’m old enough to remember when there was some freedom &
    liberty in this country, not regulations,mandates & laws that
    have killed it.
    The heart &soul of this country was small towns,small farms &
    small family businesses,these were the arteries & veins that
    bound it together.
    Neither party is doing the country a proper governing job.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on January 6, 2012 at 2:40 pm said:

      And whose fault is that? Who puts the people in control of the parties in ot power?

      Perhaps if people lived up to their basic civic responsibilities, they would have less to complain about.

      When was the last time you went to the polls and voted for your local Republican or Democrat precinct leader?

      Most people don’t even know that there are such elections. As a result, these positions become vacancies that get filled by the existing people in power and of course they fill these vacancies with their supporters.

      But if all the people who complain did what they were they were suppose to, they would elect the righnt people to represent them as county committeemen. In turn those county cimmitteemen wouyld elect an effective County Chairmen. Those county chairmen would then elect the right state chairmen who would elect the right national chairmen.

      Problem is, the complainers and whiners who want to point blame, do not particpate in a way that is significant enough toi influence the two parties.

      But in addition to that, the problem is not “both parties”.

      A Third Party is not the answer. A third party will still have to participate in the same process which is poisoned by greed, egos, and the need to make deals and compromises in order to get the support that one needs to get things done. A third Party will suffer the same problems of the human conditions that the two established do.

      So don’t give me this garbage about the two Parties killikng this nation. Look in the mirror and then point your finger at the image you see in that mirror.

      Reply
      • GWjr, on March 31, 2012 at 11:32 pm said:

        You are 100% correct–We the People need to become the Government, surround the current “Professional Politicians” by sheer numbers, and honor the Constitution and Declaration again. The basic system is still there, all we have to do is get Off the Couch and into government, for a term or two, then back to private life. No more pensions for ELECTED officials. Government is not their personal pig trough.
        BTW, the green energy/carbon footprint ideas in this 2008 platform are totally bogus–hope they’re out of the new one!

        Reply
      • Anthony C Stewart--2016, on April 22, 2012 at 4:51 am said:

        oh Kempite, perhaps you should take your head out of your party’s ass long enough to learn what it is to be the average US citizen.
        you say people dont vote in the right elections (i agree) but the reason behind it is because they are not slammed with ads at every commercial break like during the bigger races. the reason for that, you also answered, because the vacancies are filled by the existing people. why advertise when you get to place your pawn there?
        if the people who complain were properly educated (something politicians often fear) then things would change. but in the mean time, people are forced to focus more on paying bills and insuring their child has medical coverage, and a college education, and more, all while neither party gives a damn about it.
        you are wrong in your claim that the problem isnt both parties; it is. the people who run the parties, are the parties, and in my 30+ years i have yet to see either side do much in the way of worthy, and nothing in the way of making me proud.
        a third, fourth, fifth party might not be an answer, but they may provide some help. if we had more parties running then we would have more in the way of balance as folks take office, one would keep the other in check. if we keep our citizens educated then they would be able to make these decisions and further keep the parties in check. our current system is flawed and failing. the two parties in charge spend so much time bitching between themselves they can hardly do their jobs. furthermore, their jobs are a privilege, and legislation needs to be passed which would prevent them from becoming a career.
        the two parties are choking this nation and everything it ever stood for, even at the nation’s best.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on April 22, 2012 at 11:41 am said:

          Speaking of asses, take your fat head out of your own fat ass schmuck. You are actually trying argue that people don’t know things like who the Vice President of the United States is because they are busy paying for college or paying their electirc bill?. Do you actually expect me to accept that people only vote in presidential and gubernatorial elections becuase those are the campaigns that advertise most and so people don’t know or think about the others?

          I am not sure what America you live in, but the one I know did not see its people engage the King’s men in battle because Coca-Cola or Ben Franklin were running ads for Independence on MTV.

          And to say that people do not know things because there aren’t enough political parties exposing people to their propoganda is like saying that MSNBC is a reliable news outfit.

          Sorry, but your attempt to make excuses for ignorant people who simply believe what any Party, thrid, fourth, fifth, or sixteenth, tells them, is as ludicrous as your own plans to run for President in 2016.

          People can sing the lyrics to everyone of Lady Gaga’s songs, but they can’t tell you how much our national debt is? People can tell you how many times Lindsay Lohan was arrested in the past two years, but they can’t tell you the name of their Congressional Representative and I am suppose to believe it’s because Democrats and Republicans don’t advertise enough? And you want me to believe that some fantasy third Party will advertise enough and correctly inform voters of the issues and their civic responsinbilities?

          Sorry, but I do not buy your excuses. I do not buy into your rationalizing the inadequaciers of the American electorate by blaming the two pareties and claiminmg that the average American is so busy trying to pay their cell phone bills, that they don’t have the time to know when to vote, the issues of importance, who the candidates are, and where the candidates stand on those issues.

          It sounds to me like you’re one of those liberal fools who actually believe that the people don’t have time to be bothered by the issues, so they should send you to do the job for them because you’ll pay attention to the issues for them. You also sound to me like someone who can’t make it in real world politics, so you’re trying to create your own political world with your own political Party.

          But that said, there is a reason there are two main political parties in the United States and that is because each one represents the two basic political ideologies that we as a people must confront. Do we want to run our own lives, or do we want the government to run our lives for us. It is the same ideological question that gave birth to the American Revolution and it is the same question of direction that our nation faces in this election and every election. Now you may claim that there is more to an election than ideology and you might even be right, to a certain extent. However, any and all the other issues eventually come down to the basic idelogical question at hand and which are represented by the two Parties. Now if you feel the two parties are not represresenting their ideologies properly, then get involved and do the work and put in the time to change the Parties, but don’t pretend that a third party is the answer or that your naive ass becoming President of the United States will solve our problems. Besides, how can you say in one breath that the political parties are the problem and then in another breath try to claim that having more of those political parties that are problem, will solve the problem.

          Sorry dude, but your thinking and arguments are bass ackwards.

          Reply
      • Christy, on August 28, 2012 at 1:19 pm said:

        You might be right about a third party no being a solution, but that doesn’t really disapprove the idea that both parties are bad. Which, in my opinion, is definitely true. Until you give me evidence to believe one (or perhaps both) party is truly making this country more free, then you might have a point.

        Reply
      • Christina, on September 3, 2012 at 4:04 am said:

        Kempite, it’s people like you who made me leave the republican party. And the church. You, sir, are an asshole.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on September 3, 2012 at 2:51 pm said:

          Coming from a ditzy bitch like you, I take that as a compliment and am proud to have successfuly flushed brainless posers like you out. Mission accomplished.

          Reply
  11. Mary, on January 14, 2012 at 12:47 pm said:

    I am not a Republican, and never will be, but i wanted to read the Republican platform to see what it says. Most of it is very nice words. Very reasonable words. Words neither side could object to. I feel like the Republicans’ actions do not follow their lovely words.

    And, Obama is certainly not a socialist. Far from it. Quit shouting horrible things like that to scare the pants off people. He’s not a socialist. He’s not a muslim.

    Quit taking only the side of the corporations and big money. People are contributing members of our society…and should be in charge. Work with everyone to abolish corporate personhood.

    I wish we could all meet somewhere in the middle. You don’t get your radical ideas, I don’t get mine…but we get something better and we ratchet down the fear mongering. I’m tired of being afraid. We shouldn’t have gotten into Iraq, we were lied to. We shouldn’t have gotten into Afganistan. And we definitely do not, cannot need to attack Iran. That is very very dangerous. Yes, i know you will say it’s dangerous if we don’t. I don’t believe you.

    and Debbie, i’m glad you are following in your father’s footsteps and want to be Republican when you can vote. Please just look around, learn from people other than people you know or your family knows. There are many many other perspectives in the world. Please have an open mind. I try not to only look at the world through my liberal/progressive mind set. I learn a lot that way, some of it i can understand and see why the conservatives feel that way…some of it i can’t. It’s something we should all be doing.

    Thanks

    Reply
    • Kempite, on January 14, 2012 at 1:58 pm said:

      Dear Liberal;

      I am afraid you might need to take the time to actually study the things you try to address. You might want to look up the word socialism and understand its meaning in the context of government. Then you might want to take the facts surrounding the initiatives and actions of President Obama and your Party and compare them the the actual meaning of the word socialism. If you were sincere, you would discover that the liberal agenda which disengenuous leftist like yourself, who try to cloak under the label of progressivism, is nothing other than totally antithetical to the founding principles of this nation. The left’s agenda is one that believes government is the only source of life and that it needs to regulate everything from what products are produced, what food we eat, and what lightbulbs we use, to how much a person can earn. That is nothing other than socialism.

      Your attempts to deny that are indicative of one of two things. You are either incredibly ignorant or just another lying tool of the left’s vast propaganda machine.

      Furthermore, what you do not even begin to realize is that while you claim our President and the ideology you share with him are not examples of socialism, you try to argue against the opposing ideology by using socialist talking points and attacking the free market and capitalism. That is just hypcritical and to be expected since hypocrisy is a trademark of American liberalism.

      And lastly, I do not find defending the free market to be radical. I find it to be an essentialy part of being an American. Such ideas may be considered radical by socialists, but not by most Americans. What I do find radical is your defense of socialism and your inability to be courageous enough to call it what is. Instead you try to rebrand soicialism by calling it progressivism. That in and of itself undermines your attempts to paint the G.O.P as evil corporatists. And I might add, that while you are trying to suggest that there is some unholy alliance between Republicans and corporations, you might want to take a look at your standardberaers financial filings. if you did, you will find that he has solicitied and accepted more donations from his corporate allies than any other Republican candidate running for President. It was President Obama who not so long ago accepted a million dollars from BP, then made them exempt from certain regulations and gave them a safety award right before BP created the nation’s worst ecological disaster in history as BP Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and gushed oil in to the Gulf of Mexico for months.

      So the next time you wish to make accusations, again, I suggest ypou get your facts straight. Getting your information from Keith Olbermann is not exacxtly research and does not exactly make you a very reliable critic. You can’t even be honest about your beliefs.

      In closing, remember this……LiberalsRlosers@aol.com. Based upon your recent email to that address, I couldn’t help but reinforce the point.

      Reply
  12. Mary, on January 14, 2012 at 5:07 pm said:

    you know, i went to your website to learn something. i wanted to see what the republican platfform is. and i get attacked. sure i said i would never be republican because i can’t possibly believe what you believe. but why must you always attack people. if you would have a decent, adult, calm chat with people about things, maybe we could learn from each other and move our country along.

    as it is, we are on opposite poles. don’t assume all liberals or progressives are ignorant or spouting blah blah blha

    i am so tired of you conservatives…as you are of us liberals.

    just step back and listen to someone else for once.
    TRY to find some comment ground.
    it can’t be your way or the highway
    as it can’t be my way or the high way.

    conservative economics has gotten us into this mess
    greed has gotten us into this mess

    good bye

    Reply
    • Kempite, on January 14, 2012 at 5:32 pm said:

      Wa…waaa, waaa…….. Typical liberal cry baby. It is okay for you to email me and call me names because you do not like my email address LiberalsRlosers@aol.com, and then it is okay for you to accuse Republicans of being aginast the people, but when I offer you several examples that contradict your blanket statements and level a response that was in line with your own personal attacks, sudeenly that is unfair.

      If liberals like you would just begin to use some brains, include some facts in thinking, and drop your double standard, most people might be able to take you more seriously. Instead, liberals like you go out of your way to prove just how hypocritical you are. And so for me, it is my way or the highway when it comes to conservatism vs. liberalism. I reject contemporary liberalism in every way, shape, and form. It is what has led to a culture of dependency that is responsible for a growth in government that is antithetical to the intended goals which gave bith to our nation.

      Nostrovia, comrade!

      Reply
      • Dennis, on May 7, 2012 at 2:17 pm said:

        Typical conservative bullying jerk. You have not contributed a single factual point or theory in support of conservatism, yet you jump at the chance to antagonize liberals.

        You refuse to actually open your eyes and pay attention to what’s going on, both in your party and in the world. Yet you insist on spewing ignorant and sometimes hateful language at people. Your ignorance on things like socialism, war, and the market system is almost appalling, especially when you turn around and call liberals ignorant. There is nothing remotely socialist about any American policy that has ever been produced by any President ever, and your mischaracterization of the left’s viewpoints is horribly unfounded and misguided.

        Please turn off FOX News, read a book, and come back when you actually have a clue what’s going on.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on May 7, 2012 at 2:36 pm said:

          Are you for real? Each of the more than 1,000 posts I have person ally written here contain facts which prove the failings of liberalism and hypocritical liberal foot soldiers like yourself. It is clear that that like most liberals you have no grasp for reality or the facts that dictate reality. And to claim that there is nothing remotely sociualist abolut any policy any President has enacted is about as ludicrous as the claim that you could be taken seriously or a legitimate and unbiased defender of the truth.

          You’re actually a funny guy. Perhaps you try out for a stint on the Jon Stewart Show.

          Reply
      • Frank, on August 22, 2012 at 8:42 pm said:

        Right-wing politics are the enemy of democracies everywhere they rear their ugly heads. If we survive the next 100 years, conservative politics will be just another nightmare memory.

        Reply
    • Ginger Smith, on February 18, 2012 at 10:40 pm said:

      Mary–why are you here? Obviously not to learn, only to spout ignorant-hate filled diatribes. With what do you disagree? If you disagree, do you have a better suggestion? In your entire post there is not one debate of the issues, only grammatically incorrect line after line of nothing!

      Reply
  13. Tyler, on February 7, 2012 at 9:24 am said:

    Well…This has been interesting…I came to this page to learn, not to read an endless arguement between “liberals and “conservatives” although i do enjoy a nice, healthy political arguement every now and then.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on February 7, 2012 at 11:28 am said:

      Well Tyler, if you came to this page to learn about the 2008 G.o.P. platform, after reading it, I am sure you were able to learn whatever it is you intended to. If you read the comments, you will find opinions, and how much you can learn from those comments is simply based on how much faith you have in the arguments presented in those opinions.

      So what it comes down to is to how much you learn is all a matter of how much you can comprehend. The platform is what is it is and if you came here to learn what’s in it, you should easily be able to.

      Reply
  14. Aaron, on February 8, 2012 at 12:14 am said:

    I’m from Australia and this is one of the whackiest party platforms I have ever read. Hilarious, keep up the comedy America!

    Reply
    • Kempite, on February 8, 2012 at 12:24 am said:

      Aaron, And you’ve read a lot of platforms have you? Give me a break dude. I luv Aussie’s. Most of the ones I know understand the meaning of independence, self-reliance, and individual empowerment. Most of the Austrailian citizens I have had the fortune to meet care little for the weekness and culture of dependency that is promoted by the principles contained within less conservative platforms. But I guess it’s the same everywhere. There are always a few brainless, mamby-pamby, rotten apples in every crowd. Including Austrailia. Do your country a favor, spend more time at an Occupy protest and less time at the voting booth. It will keep you busy while the rest of your countrymen fight for the stregnth and prosperity of your nation.

      Meanwhile, I and my Party will do the same for my nation without the burden of your ignorance and socilaist tendencies.

      Reply
    • Bobby, on February 14, 2012 at 12:25 pm said:

      i’m an american have been for 17 years and 8 months and i am not ignorant i support the right to have your own beliefs don’t dog on people for having “whacky beliefs”. fagot.

      Reply
    • Ginger Smith, on February 18, 2012 at 10:41 pm said:

      An attack, by yet you fail to explain which planks are “whacky.” Can you not do so?

      Reply
  15. James, on February 27, 2012 at 9:22 pm said:

    The Parties keep swapping issues. Are we as voters supposed to swap our views 180* every time the Powers That Be decide what we’re supposed to believe this decade? What are Republicans supposed to believe?

    Reply
  16. Gary, on February 28, 2012 at 2:48 pm said:

    I am trying to save a ‘platform’ for the party I have been a member of for 64 years. I have saved one for the Democrat and Libertarian parties, and that was fairly simple. I can’t cut and paste the huge document above, and the comments are also so verbose that I am discouraged from reading them. Can’t we distill our thoughts a little more?

    Reply
  17. Eric David Zuelke, on March 24, 2012 at 8:27 pm said:

    @ Kempite
    What do you think our government leaders should do to pass legislation with the opposing opinions of “liberal hypocrites” and republicans? As you have said before, “And so for me, it is my way or the highway when it comes to conservatism vs. liberalism,” so obviously you do not want to compromise. I know of a few ways other countries create legislation but these methods are unnamable to the Constitution. Again I am just curious as to what you would do?

    Reply
    • Kempite, on April 1, 2012 at 2:03 pm said:

      I would simply find the areas where agreement can be reached and move ahead in those areas of agreement. And as for that which which agreement and compromise cannot be reached, I would leave it up to the voters who have the ultimate say. If there is an issue so important and so desireable and which a majority of Americans want decided in either a conservative or liberal direction, they will elect a Congress that will take them in that direction. For all the complaints about Congress not being able to work together, it is the opinions of the American people which are reflected in the makeup of Congress.

      Despite all the complaints about voters being disatisfied with Congress as whole, a majority of those same voters support their own Representative(s). They just don’t like the other members who are representing everyone else. So what it comes down to is this. The people decide and if they can’t decide, that indecision and inability to reach compromise is reflectedc by the Congress that they elect.

      If I were a member of Congress, I would see my job as one which reflects the prevailing opinion of my constituents. But another part of my job would be to come before the people of my district and layout the issues and my solutions in a way that is convincing and that they can eventually agree with. It is called building support for your position. If I can not build support for my positions, I am either not very good at convincing people of my opinion or I am just not in synch with the people I represent. Either way, those people I represent will eventually have the ability to judge both my abiity to lead and whether or not I share their thinking and can represent that thinking in Washington by reelecting me or voting me out.

      A representative is elected to represent the views of his or her people. They are not elected to neglect ignore their beliefs and the beliefs of those they represent, inorder to simply agree with the people of another district and of another opinion. Compromise sounds wonderful in theory but in reality it is not Congress that has the problem with making comprimises, it is the people whom they represent who have a problem making compromises. Voters say they want compromise but they do not realize that they approve the theory and not the reality of compromise. For example, senior citizens want Congress to compromise and work together. But when it comes to Social Security, they don’t want their Congressman to compromise on things like raising the Social Security eligibility age, or reducing benefits. People on unemployment want Congress to compromise and work together, or so they think. But when it comes to extending unemployment benefits beyond 99 weeks, they do not want a compromise, they simply want an extension.

      So the answer to your question is, government leaders should stick to their guns, do their best to demonstrate the rightgeousness of their positions and try to convince others of why it is the right thing to do, and stand up for what they believe in. It is all up to the voters and the opinions that they elect to be represented by.

      Reply
  18. Karl, on March 29, 2012 at 7:22 pm said:

    IT IS TIME TO UPDATE THE GOP PLATFORM….AT LEAST REMOVE JOHN MCCAIN AS “OUR CANDIDATE”

    Reply
    • Kempite, on April 1, 2012 at 12:00 pm said:

      Karl…………….I guess maybe someone has not told you yet…………..but parties write their platforms every four years, you know, when they have that little thing called their National Convention where they elect that person called their presidential nominee. And I guess no one has told you yet that the G.O.P. has not held their convention and not yet officially nominated their candidate. In other words…………get up to speed and stop spouting stupid shit! The Republican Partry platform will be updated when the Republican Party, as well as the Democrat Party write their new platforms at their respective conventions.

      Reply
      • Karl, on April 14, 2012 at 12:05 pm said:

        I was trying to get up to speed by reading what I thought was the GOP official site which turned out to be your blog. Sorry to have offended the high an mighty with my “stupid shit” but I think the GOP should update the introduction at least annually. Is this too much to ask??

        Reply
  19. melaniett, on April 1, 2012 at 9:47 am said:

    Why the topic list I see here is ‘distorted’?

    It seems like all links to the topics are posted in one line.

    Could you guys fix it? It is really bad looking.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on April 1, 2012 at 1:37 pm said:

      Sorry but it must be your display screen and the dimension parameters set forth by WordPress that create a distrotion on your end because I do not see any distrotions on this end.

      Reply
  20. Lone Puma, on June 25, 2012 at 9:16 am said:

    The 2012 election may be the first election we may not vote. Out of all the so qualified people in Congress, Senate or the the general public, this is what we have to choose from? I don’t think the Republican party is actually interested in the White House, but has given up on the idea as most have. America has become a country of despotic laws, usurping our Constitution at will. The God of the Bible has been traded for the unrighteousness greed of men without any to realize America’s lost her moral compass. Politicians continue to give way to idolatry. Calling what is good evil and what is evil good. America’s politicians will have no effect in preventing America come to knees with the impending judgments of God for her wickedness. That is the sure bet!
    It no longer matters if you believe in God or not, He’s about to show what it is to dismiss righteousness for wickedness and all will see and mourn for her destruction. We have those who don’t know God to thank for our nation’s destruction and God will not relent. It may be too late for America to repent and turn from her wickedness, but I hope for those who have, will keep their eyes looking up, as we’re at the end of the age.
    Bear this in mind: But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost; In whom the god of this world (Satan) hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus’ sake. For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

    America has chosen to walk in darkness rather then the light because their deeds are filled with wickedness and greed, but not to fret, God is about to judge the wicked, lets not be here when it comes!

    Reply
  21. Karen Etlinger, on June 28, 2012 at 5:53 pm said:

    Will somebody tell Romney that he has to have a plan about CREATING JOBS, IMMIGRATION, HEALTH CARE. He needs to
    talk about these three issues immediately, and comtinuing speaking to these issues until the election, over and over again. Where has
    he been. This is almost July. No plan, no presidency!!

    Reply
    • Kempite, on June 29, 2012 at 1:25 am said:

      Karen, apparently someone needs to tell you that you need to do some reading. I suggest you visit Romney’s website where you will find the answers to your questions. Youir problem is that want to sit in front of the TV and have the liberal hosts of MSNBC tell you what you think are the facts. But the truth is Romney has been quite publicly presenting his agenda and proposals for more than a year now. The question is where have you been?

      Reply
      • Karen Etlinger, on June 29, 2012 at 11:42 am said:

        I live in Santa Fe, NM. Apparently, Romney’s message has not gotten here yet. And, I would not lower my standards by listing to MSNBC,
        CNN or any other liberal. I am not the only one that thinks Romney
        has not spoken to these issues. The few conservatives that live
        here are also waiting for Romney to lay out his plans.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on June 29, 2012 at 1:58 pm said:

          Have you gone to his website yet to read the plans you are asking for? The answers at at your finger tips. I knoiw California is out of synch with most Americans but i do believe they still have the internet out there. Don’t they?

          Reply
          • Karen Etlinger, on June 30, 2012 at 5:40 pm said:

            I have always planned to vote for the Republican candidate. I want Obama to lose. If I do not know what I asked you about, then many other people do not either. This means that Romney will not be elected. Have you ever listed to Larry Kudlow, or do you even know who he is? If the Republican party does not get on top of this, we will have another failed candidate as we did last time with John McCain.

          • Kempite, on July 23, 2012 at 1:01 pm said:

            Karen, Funny you should ask about Larry Kudlow. But let me answer your question about him with a question? Did you know that I was in talks to get Kudlow’s candidacy for Mayor of New York City off the ground? Did you even know that Kudlkow was once contemplating a run for Mayor? Now to answer your question, not only do I know who Kudlow is, I know him, and know more about him than you ever will. I also know this, you know little about anything you try to discuss, including the candidates and people you claim to support.

            It might also be worth while for you to understand that most Americans are not yet paying attention to the election and for that reason, most of the meat of the Romney campaign is not being thrown out to the public in droves at this time because news is only news if it new. If Romney were to introduce all his proposals right now, the news would cover while most Americans are not paying attention and they won’t cover it later when most Americans are paying attention.

            I mean even you, a so called supporter of Romney has not taken the time to answer yopur own questions and read the economic platform that he has put out. Even you, someone who claims to be paying attention to the election, totally missed when Mitt Romney introduced his 59 point economic plan. something he did last Fall.

            So get a grip and get some facts.

  22. MorningJava, on July 6, 2012 at 5:43 pm said:

    Decriminalizing Marijuana would be a bold and sensible addition to the Republican Platform in 2012, even Rev. Pat Robertson is calling for decriminalization calling the current situation “insanity.” 1 in 6 people in American Prisons are there because of Marijuana; this does more to destroy the lives of young people than the drugs does, ruining educational and employment opportunities and costing Billions in tax dollars every year. Certainly, this would capture the youth vote and catch Democrats in their huge hypocrisy on this issue – with a President that has bragged about “smoking weed” no less!

    Reply
  23. MorningJava, on July 6, 2012 at 5:44 pm said:

    Decriminalizing Marijuana would be a bold and sensible addition to the Republican Platform in 2012, even Rev. Pat Robertson is calling for decriminalization calling the current situation “insanity.” 1 in 6 people in American Prisons are there because of Marijuana; this does more to destroy the lives of young people than the drugs does, ruining educational and employment opportunities and costing Billions in tax dollars every year. Certainly, this would capture the youth vote and catch Democrats in their huge hypocrisy on this issue – with a President that has bragged about “smoking weed” no less!

    Reply
  24. frank pontillo, on July 12, 2012 at 5:19 pm said:

    • In the 1970s, one in 50 Americans were on food stamps — today that figure is one in seven. Food Stamp spending has doubled since 2008 and quadrupled since 2001.
    Democrats want to raise taxes so they can buy more votes. This message should be broadcast loud and clear!!!!!!!

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/12/usda-uses-spanish-soap-operas-to-push-food-stamp-participation-among-non-citizens-citizens/#ixzz20RY5NpJq
    •
    USDA uses Spanish soap operas to push food stamps among non-citizens, citizens [AUDIO]
    dailycaller.com
    The government has been targeting Spanish speakers with radio “novelas” promoting food stamp usage as part of a stated mission to increase participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

    Reply
  25. LynnDee Bradley, on July 12, 2012 at 9:53 pm said:

    Gay rights??? I have been a republican all my life and can only say Abraham Lincoln would roll over in his grave if he knew what you guys have done to our GOP—-am so disappointed in this platform–Women’s Rights, Abortion, Birth Control not mentioned. Get a grip guys the far right is very wrong-the culture has changed–pay attention. I used to be proud to be a Republican –now I am only ashamed

    Reply
    • Kempite, on July 13, 2012 at 6:00 pm said:

      And Rerpublicans are ashamed by you. So join forces with liberals, rewrite the Constitution, and continue to support the progressive agenda which denies our unalienable rights in support of government control of everything from how much you can earn to your healthcare decisions.

      Reply
  26. wayne yamamura, on July 17, 2012 at 8:21 pm said:

    if Romney does not present a valid plan to create jobs and leave the medicare account alone I do not believe he can win anything.
    why? because obama is a gifted liar and we need a valid plan that Romney if elected will and can put into action within the first year as president. if voters do not believe it , then the republican party is in deep doo doo and the lying democrates will suceed in ruining this great country of ours. we need someone running the country who is proud of it just as we are.

    Reply
  27. Peggy, on August 11, 2012 at 2:54 pm said:

    This has to be the worst move the Republican party has done yet. They gave away the last presidential election when they picked Sarah Palin. Granted I like her but she was no match for Biden in the debates and at the time she was a total unkown. Romney is already seen as an out of touch with reality rich dude. Now they add Ryan to that mix. What is going on with the Republican party? Michael Savage hit the nail on the head! What are they thinking?

    Reply
  28. Patricia Riley, on August 12, 2012 at 11:21 am said:

    Dear Mr. Romney and Mr. Ryan, I believe that your platform is for the rich and the rich only. Thank you so much. I will have to vote Democrat for the first time in my life. I might as well change my party, too. I have four college degrees and still can’t get a job because I don’t speak Spanish and have been out of the job market for four years due to breast cancer. I have to go back and get one more degree in hopes of there being a job when I finish next year. I live on welfare, cash assistance of $180 and food stamps $200 thank goodness for that or i would not eat. I live on the edge of being homeless. Your policies are not good for the people of the US because most of us are now on welfare and homeless because there are no jobs. We need to stop giving other countries our money. Give it to us the American people who need it and deserve it. I will not vote Republican this time and any time in the future. Thank you, you have let me down and i’m sure i am not the only one. Good Luck.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on August 12, 2012 at 12:07 pm said:

      The first thing that strikes me is the fact that you have 4 college degrees. That is a sure sign of just how much trouble the American education system is in. If you have 4 college degrees and are actually as stupid as one can gleem from your comment, than it is obvious that college degrees are meaningless. And I also have a feeliong that you can get 500 different college degrees and will still be unable to get a job because you are an absolute blithering idiot.

      If you need a job, you might want to elect a President who knows how to create a job. But thanks for commenting. Your ignorant remarks exemplify how idiotic liberals are and are honey, you are a liberal. Attamptrs to claim you never for Democrasts before are overshadowed by the suspicion that you probably never even voted before. One thing for sure though is that you never votede for Republicans before. Someone of your mindset obviuously never believed in the freedom articulated by our constitution. Someone of your thinking never believed in limited government or an opportunity based society. So you never supported Republicans before and you never will. Why? Because you are a liberal and your attempots to suggest that picking Ryan as his running mate will hurt Mitt Romney is understood to be the opinion of another brainless liberal who is trying to evoke an emotional conclusion instead of a logical conclusion.

      Reply
    • Alan, on August 31, 2012 at 4:07 pm said:

      Yeah, you’re lying.

      If you have four college degrees then that shows that you are either a professional academic who hasn’t been trying to get a job, someone who has plenty of money and uses it to go to school instead of putting it away into savings, you have been milking the federal government for Pell Grants, or you have four worthless certificates from a community college that you are calling degrees. You are living off welfare, cash assistance, and food stamps and making about as much money as I am working and trying to provide for a family. You aren’t struggling, you are just a worthless human being.

      Any way you slice it, you are lying and you have many opportunities that you aren’t taking. Voting for President Obama is not going to help you get a job, but it will help you continue your self-delusion and reward you for your lies.

      Reply
    • jimincolo, on September 3, 2012 at 11:57 pm said:

      That’s unbelievable… four degrees?? What are they in and what are you planning for the next one?

      Reply
  29. Lou, on August 18, 2012 at 11:52 pm said:

    Me thinks the Republican Party platform is a bit on the rhetoric side and too much critical talk about the other party. This doesn’t seem so much as a platform as a bunch of planks on some questionable beams that have questionable supports not well grounded in the foundation of the real sources that were responsible for the invention of the United States of America.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on August 19, 2012 at 12:05 am said:

      Methinks you’re an ass and that your opinion lacks any support to prove your conclusion. But I am sure you have read the Democrat Party platform and found that it is chock full of substance and strong on constitutional values. Right? And in case your low I.Q. didn’t allow you to understand, the question was rhetorical.

      Reply
  30. Leon Buckberrough, on August 20, 2012 at 1:34 pm said:

    Their were two TV clips, I saw, which would make two great commerical”s against Obana, One, having him talking about, how our service men & women should pay for the care thay receive, after being wounded, because our armed services were all volunteer military, and the second clip caught Obana on a open mike, telling a VP from Russia,to tell Putin, that he would do everything he promised after He was relected.

    Reply
  31. Glinda Olson, on August 21, 2012 at 11:04 am said:

    If the Republican Party chooses to put the banning of abortion on the platform, I will vote democratic for the first time in my life. They will lose my vote.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on August 23, 2012 at 12:25 am said:

      Glinda, are you slow or just a Democrat? Republicans have held the same position on abortion for over four decades, so if keeping the same position in 2012 that they had in the past is what causes you to voite Democrat for the first time, than you are either just turning 18 or never voted before. Either way, you’re not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you?

      Reply
      • Dr.J, on September 9, 2012 at 10:43 pm said:

        It is absolutely not true that “Republicans have held the same position on abortion for over four decades.” Nixon did not publicly comment on Roe v. Wade. Please listen to the tapes for his actual position. He said, “There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white. Or a rape.” (Here he revealed his continued commitment to racial prejudice, too.) In 1967, then Governor Ronald Reagan signed into law the California Therapeutic Abortion Act, to reduce back-alley abortions. He only became anti-abortion later. The 1972 Republican Party platform did not mention God or religion even once, and does not even mention abortion until 1976. “Over four decades?” Do the math: who’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer now? But rather than focus on something minor like actual historical facts, I see that you’re more content to accuse others of not doing so. Glass houses, my friend. Glass houses.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on September 12, 2012 at 11:01 pm said:

          Hey Dr. J…….please show me the Republican Party platform that has held a position that is different from the one taken on the issue today. Please use your brain and please stay on topic. Did I say anything about Richard Nicon? Did I say anything about Ronald Reagan? Stay on tpoic buddy and you might be able to actually add something of value to it.

          Reply
  32. Michael A. Butler, on August 21, 2012 at 3:53 pm said:

    As a very Conservative Republican, I agree with much of this platform, but not all. I do think we need to seriously consider adding into this platform under the Maintaining The Sanctity and Dignity of Human Life section the option for abortion in the cases of rape, incest, the absolute non-viability of the child, or the health of the mother. I also feel that while you can preserve the sanctity of marriage, we Republicans can also see the need for Civil Unions between Gays and Lesbians. To deny this is against everything I stand for as a Conservative Republican. I want the same rights and responsibilities for all, straight or gay, and with that, I would like to see at a minimum Same Sex Unions be added.

    Reply
  33. Father Pete, on August 21, 2012 at 9:16 pm said:

    Dear Kempite,
    You have way too much time on your hands, my child. Please calm yourself down and get a life.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on August 23, 2012 at 12:22 am said:

      Father Pete, If you’re taking the time to conclde that I have too much time on my hand and then have the time to tell me that I have too much time on my hand, than I suggest you have proven your own point but in regards to yourself.

      Reply
  34. joseph hugh o'brien, on August 22, 2012 at 3:46 pm said:

    my apologies kempite … i thought i had arrived at a government page or party page on the gop’s 2012 platform and not rush limbaughs many mouth pieces … my apologies to those poor fools who follow such propaganda … and would vote for adolf hitler just to get the black guy out of office … fly your confederate flag for now … enjoy your white trash ignorance for now … nice page except for you …

    Reply
    • Kempite, on August 23, 2012 at 12:15 am said:

      Joe, don’t apologize, just provide some facts. Short of that your words as meaningless as the Marxist agenda you support. Don’t forget to vote now. Remember Election Day is November 7th, 2012.

      Reply
      • Carla Kelly, on September 3, 2012 at 2:50 am said:

        Kempite, you speak of someone supporting “the Marxist agenda” but do not delineate which one. Do you mean Euro communism, Marxism-Leninism, Marxism-Leninism after Stalin, Post-Stalin Moscow-aligned communism, Hoxhaism, Marxist feminism, Marxist humanism, Anti-revisionism, Maoism, Trotskyism, Left Communism, Western Marxism, Structural Marxism, Autonomist Marxism, Marxism-Deleonism, or what? Please study up and be specific, as you so often council others to do.

        What I see is that you have as little respect for others as your beloved party has. And when you resort to name calling, which you so frequently do, you have acknowledged that you have no valid argument.

        Reply
        • Kempite, on September 3, 2012 at 3:21 pm said:

          Carla, your attempt to take the conversation into a discussion of macro-Marxism is a traditional egg-headed liberal diversion which is based upon the anti-American premise that any form of Marxism is tolerable in our Republic. You see, that’s the problem with liberals like you. You look for any excuse you can find to consider having my nation adopt any form of Marxism. However; I address all forms of Marxism under their rightful name….”Marxism” and I consider the agendas of all forms of Marxism to be illegitimate. So in essence, what you have done is proven yourself to be intellectually disingenuous. Your attempt to try to seem like some high browed intellectual actually just proved you are a pinhead who trips over textbook knowledge and fails to actually ever comprehend what you cut and paste from Wikipedia. As for the name calling, it is a direct acknowledgement of my total lack of respect for the left, who rarely if ever present valid arguments and never seem to be able to base a debate on facts. If you don’t like that. While your very tired and overused quote about name calling might sometimes be right, there are other times when even in your alternate universe of political correctness, those names which people are called are simply accurate and honest descriptions of the fools who those names are attributed to. If you do not like that degree of honesty, I suggest you take yourself and your intolerant liberal ideology over to Think Progress where I am sure you can discover several new forms of Marxism to praise.

          Reply
          • batman, on September 30, 2012 at 7:46 pm said:

            so, if i were to say you were an ignorant douche, who tells people to provide more facts without giving any yourself, that would be alright? i mean, who is to say what qualifies someone to name calling? keep in mind, this has nothing to do with who one is voting for for president. i would not consider myself conservative or liberal (though on the one hand, i do believe gays should have the rights of anyone else, and talk of liberty while trying to deny them their “god given rights” contains a touch of hypocrisy). everyone has good and bad ideas. obama might ruin the country, romney might, we wont know until 2016. all im saying is if youre going to keep pretending to take a respectful, objective point of veiw from the right as long as those from the left do as well, at least attempt to do what you say. and by the way, a list of all the forms of marxism does not make one a marxist. ignorant douche.

          • Kempite, on September 30, 2012 at 8:14 pm said:

            Dickface… I provide the facts in my posts. If you understood how to read, youy might realize that. So the question is, do you know how to read or are do you just have a comprehension problem? As for gays, being gay myself, I still can’t seem to find where the Constitution or the Bible tells me that marrying another man is my “God given right”. But that simply takes us right back to your inability to read and your comprehension problem. As for those of us who have IQ’s that are higher than our shoe size, there are several basic understandings here which useless tools like you can’t grasp. First, this is not a federal issues. States issue marriage licenses, not the federal government. Second, I do believe that the word “marriage” is traditionally defined as the union between a man and a woman. It also has a religious connection and as such, I believe that the government has no say. However, I do believe that states should offer the same legal recognition of same sex couples that they do for opposite sex couples. This in my opinion should be done by issuing domestic partnerships which allows the government to offer equal treatment to both hetero and homosexual unions. And by the way… your list doeds make you look like a pinheaded fool who just doesn’t get the point. Asshole.

          • batman, on October 3, 2012 at 9:11 pm said:

            kempite, you have a good point. and after reveiwing certain facts, i agree with you on some of these things, however i still do beleive that not calling the same thing with the same rights marriage idiotic. i would jsut like to say you are not a very nice person/ this disrespect is mutual yes? lets talk about obamacare, ooh fun.

  35. Robert Becker, on August 23, 2012 at 7:46 pm said:

    I am an independent and a moderate and came her to see what the Republican party has to offer in there platform. I believe that both radical liberals and radical conservatives are both dangerous. If both parties would remember that is country was formed by people with different outlooks then we would all be better off. Our congressmen sure have no problem agreeing to give themselves raises each year. What we really need is an amendment to limit the terms of our elected officials, not amendments to control people. I do not believe in abortion, but being a man I cannot attest to how a women would feel being forced to carry a child of someone who had raped her, let alone raise the child. If she chooses to abort then it is her that will answer to God and not the members of a political party who think it is there duty to control what the people do.

    I do completely agree with fiscal responsibility which also includes those on the upper end as well. i am not an Obama supporter but I also have a hard time trusting Romney. The fact that my income in about 30k and Romney and I paid the same tax rate is appalling. The rich have created all these loopholes to prevent paying taxes. I pay my fair share and do not look for ways to get out of taxes. I am trying very hard to support Romney but I am not sure if I can. I can not help but wonder what he has to hide by refusing to release more of his tax records.

    I do know this that if someone in political office does not act quickly to stop the run away spending we will be big trouble and had better learn quickly to speak Chinese.

    Reply
    • Alan, on August 31, 2012 at 4:10 pm said:

      You and Romney pay the same tax rate, but do you pay the same tax amount? Nope, he makes 100x as much as you, so he pays 100x as much as you, there’s nothing unfair about that. Why should he pay a higher percentage as a penalty for success?

      You’re just trolling with the income tax thing. Not releasing his income taxes is totally meaningless, and a diversion to the real issues.

      Reply
  36. Robert Becker, on August 24, 2012 at 10:31 pm said:

    Entitlement is the pension plan, health coverage and benefits our intrepid members of congress have approved for themselves.

    Reply
  37. Marilyn Joan Murphy, on August 27, 2012 at 9:30 pm said:

    Interesting that the Reply box and required information stated that there would be some confidentiality, but the information had to be supplied—I thought to verify that responders are who they say they are. Perhaps I misunderstood??? Why are Matt and “Republican Conservative” allowed to list a “blogger” name while some of us are not? I certainly don’t want a mailbox full of responses when I get up tomorrow.

    Reply
  38. Tom, on August 30, 2012 at 12:34 pm said:

    I can’t believe that the platform committee thought that it would be a good thing not to restrict the size of a magizine on an automatic weapon. The right to bear arms is important and the right to protect ones property is paramount. However, an automatic weapon that will spew out rounds in a rapid fire mode is only for the purpose of killing many people in a very short amount of time. This is not the weapon that one would need for protection of property. Bow down to the all powerful NRA. I’m betting a very large percentage of the American people would agree that restricting automatic weapons including limiting the size of the magazines is something that should be considered.

    Reply
  39. Robert Becker, on August 30, 2012 at 5:36 pm said:

    Automatic weapons are not necessary for protection, nor I they fair to animals when hunting and downright dangerous.

    Reply
  40. Sam Johnson, on August 30, 2012 at 6:40 pm said:

    This made me vomit.

    Reply
  41. Robert Becker, on August 31, 2012 at 8:38 pm said:

    Well Alan, I believe you are describing a flat tax. Last time I checked we do not have a flat tax in this country. I am all for a flat tax but the worthless congress have would not even consider it. I just looked up the tax for 2010 and according to that Mr. Romney must have made less then $100,000. Since he has been bragging about all the money he makes the only way he could have qualified for 15% was to have either cheated on his taxes or taken advantage of all the loopholes the rich have given themselves. The man makes more in two months then I did in my lifetime. I came to this site to see if I could support the Republican ticket. All I see here is a bunch greedy antagonistic people. I listened to his speech last night and do agree with a few things but the most part heard the same old Republican BS. There has never been a Republican in power that did not look out first for the rich and if there is a little bit of money left for the middle class and poor people so be it. I do not like Obama but I am not sold that Romney will be any better. At best just the lesser of two evils and after disaster of the last 8 years of a Republican president I am not sure if that is good enough. Coming to this site has been a very negative experience. I have voted the republican for congress in my district last election which was pretty much a waste of time. The republican led House of Representatives managed to pass a whole 61 bills….wow so impressive, they will have to double that to beat the worst. I guess I missed that flat tax bill they passed that you refer to. Yes Mr Alan it is relevant that a Presidential candidate release his tax records. I have numerous members of your own party calling for that as well. What does Mr. Romney have to hide??? Good luck your going to need it.

    Reply
  42. JL, on September 1, 2012 at 10:32 am said:

    Could someone add an index to the different sections? It is hard to find different sections and keep up with my place if I have to leave & come back later. I see there are indices in each section, but not all of the links work, and it would help to have an index at the very beginning to get to the beginning of each section. Hope that made sense.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on September 3, 2012 at 3:24 pm said:

      Sorry for any inconvenience JL. When I can, I will try to find what links you say are not working and try to create a main index. That will take a while though. But thank you for your very legitimate suggestion.

      Reply
  43. Dwight Christofferse, on September 4, 2012 at 5:51 pm said:

    Really enjoyed this post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

    Reply
  44. The, on September 4, 2012 at 9:56 pm said:

    Not a reply to anything but regarding the issue about Romney hiding his taxes…. WHICH President hid his, and is still hidiing his, birth certificate for YEARS?!?!?! It’s not illegal to be successful. But it IS illegal to be President without being a natural born citizen !

    Reply
  45. Peter Ungar, on September 6, 2012 at 11:09 am said:

    It is shocking that Democrats had to be shamed into putting God into their platform, but it is almost equally unfortunate that the Republican platform does not mention Jesus who must guide all our actions.

    Reply
  46. smoker reviews, on September 6, 2012 at 10:34 pm said:

    We’re a bunch of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your web site provided us with helpful info to work on. You have performed an impressive task and our whole community will likely be thankful to you.

    Reply
  47. Michi Billy, on September 7, 2012 at 10:24 am said:

    I think it would be great if we had the division of church and state. If gays need to settle for ‘Civil Union’ then so should everybody else; marriage in terms of government actually IS a Civil Union, with all the associated status, tax breaks, etc., and marriage through the church of your choice is a religious rite; two different things that have been muddied and need to be separated. Everybody deserves equal rights.. EVERYBODY!

    Reply
  48. Dee, on September 7, 2012 at 11:54 am said:

    No matter what is said about separation of church and state, the fact remains that our country was founded on Christian values. Also, since the DOJ has now ruled that poker is not a gamble, but rather a ‘game of skill’, internet poker should and must be legalized.

    Reply
  49. Steve, on September 7, 2012 at 12:44 pm said:

    As an Independent I was hoping to compare the DP platform with the RP platform.
    This website does not have a visible place to download the platform in a .DOC or a .PDF format for convenient comparison. I was able to download a PDF at the Democrats website. Why is that?
    Steve

    Reply
  50. Ragnarb, on September 8, 2012 at 11:52 am said:

    Listen all you nitpicking wackos. You want to read something really bad? Try reading the dems platform; nothing by stupidity, ante freedom rants, half truths and lies attacking republicans, and the past; offering nothing. The republican platform is a forward thinking, freedom loving document that clearly respects our Constitution. It is a master’s thesis compared to the idiotic rant of the democrat platform, which in itself, is hardly readable or intelligible. Much like an obama speech! This document needs to gotten out, far and wide. The party should condense parts of it and get it all over the place, even you tube with our candidates reading it. It’s actually quite impressive. You can see the influence of the Tea Party, Ron Paul’s Libertarians and, in general, the real conservatives of the party. It’s a big step forward.

    Reply
  51. preston, on September 13, 2012 at 1:28 pm said:

    please edit the paragraph links within each major topic. current ones seem to bring up unrelated paragraphs generally above the link.
    thanx, preston

    Reply
  52. star.studded.love.94@gmail.com, on September 15, 2012 at 12:49 pm said:

    Had to read both platforms for school. I find this one to be pathetic in many ways….like for example slandering Obama endlessly. This platform also says they want a “freer” America, “Freer” as in if your not gay or a woman. Just goes to show I will not be voting republican.

    Reply
  53. Joanne E. Smith, on September 16, 2012 at 5:29 pm said:

    The commercials for Mitt Romney need to be more specific: ie, just what is the economic plan. What does it include? The commercials need to refute that the middle class will bear the burden of the economy. They need to point out specifically how Obama’s plan has failed. This is a crucial election and the middle class will definitely suffer if Obama wins. We were a once proud country where everyone’s opinion was respected. We have been made to feel we don’t deserve to have anything without giving to everybody. The work ethic that built this country is disappearing and being replaced by the handout from the government ethic.

    Reply
  54. G, on September 17, 2012 at 10:43 am said:

    Completely lacking of details. Vague language, loaded with buzz words.

    Reply
    • Kempite, on September 22, 2012 at 7:52 pm said:

      G… Your opinion might be valid if it were in reference to something such as legislation which needs to be specific. But a platform is just that… a platform. It is not a base for the specifics. A base that forms the foundation for the specifics by outlining the ideological thinking behind those specifics. Your statement simply reveals how truly ignorant you are about what a platform is.

      Reply
  55. mica long, on September 21, 2012 at 3:10 am said:

    I worked on the platform committee at the grassroots. We viewed the platform as essentially a philosophical document. But, without mentioning specific legislative demands, legislators may not be able and/or willing to apply the philosophy we espouse. Philosophy + legislative demands = no excuses. BTW I’m reading the GOP national platform and I know many of our county officials who have read our local GOP platform.

    Reply
  56. Working One, on September 23, 2012 at 2:14 pm said:

    Nobody will ever agree with the total package. You have to vote for the best candidate according to your conscience. I will vote Republican due to the non-negotiables of my Catholic faith. I hope our right to vote this way is never challenged. I am college educated (by past standards). I have worked all my life, by no means wealthy. If the paycheck is short, I cut back. That is the way it should be. Federal Funding is a joke….getting paid to do nothing! If I don’t put my time in each week, I don’t get anything out….So much said!! Oh, by the way, I am a single mother, raised two fine children (now fine adults); who, also, work and pay their own way! See….it can be done!! It is in the way they are brought up!!

    Reply
  57. Pete, on September 24, 2012 at 6:27 pm said:

    Take off the gloves! Here we go again another stooge for a candidate in an empty suit!

    Reply
  58. Alex, on September 27, 2012 at 2:21 pm said:

    I am a student and I am writing a research essay on the idea of taxation of the middle class. I need to present the accurate views of both the democrats and the republicans. I found a little evidence, but not enough to provide sufficient research background. Can anyone suggest another website where it accurately lists this subject for either Democrats or Republicans? (Preferably Republican)

    Reply
  59. Daniels Michael, on September 28, 2012 at 9:17 pm said:

    Please remind seniors what Obama did to seniors his first two years of office. That being a two year freeze on Social Security as well as lowering Medicare payments to providers. This only meant frozen income but higher out of pocket expenses for treatment.

    Reply
  60. JCNisbet, on October 13, 2012 at 2:57 am said:

    Because of many circumstances in my life I left then Christian foundational faith I thought I knew and believed. Like far too many I had spent the time warming the church pew, but failing to enter into a relationship with our heavenly Father. I started doing things I’d long thought wrong and the more I did wrong, it got easier, plus I felt the need to do more just to prove to myself and other just how much of a low down piece of scum I was. The point to all this is I started living a transsexual lifestyle, and even sold myself on the streets, Part of the finally piece that fell to push me over the edge was when I had an accident on a job drug out I lost everything, I lost my wife, and then my mother was discovered to have altimeters. When I finally lost everything and ended up in a shelt5her where I spent the time connecting with my God I could see the path from which I had strayed. Before I could read the Bible and have it say pretty much anything I wanted, even though deep down I knew better. When you ask God to come live inside,, as you read He reveals truth. When God comes to live inside you understand in truth what it means to repent and surrender all to Him. I wish the government had learned this. If they had we would not be in this mess. Repent to willfully turn from one’s sins, Surrender, to understand that I own nothing of my own ,not even my life, it all belongs to God. So I quit worrying, and ask God every minute of the day for guidance in my actions what I should do. If I’m going to spend His money I best be realty sure how He wants it spent. You might consider me as now not having much, see just four years ago I was living at a shelter having become homeless loosing everything. Wrong, while there I managed to go to a Bible College and I am two course short of a Bachelors. I have a nice apartment, furnished a car and peace of mind and heart. A good God fearing church, that doesn’t just talk the talk, but walks the walk too..
    .I only wrote to comment on the VP debate and the grinning laughing man. It hit me what we need to do. We need a clip of his grinning laughing face on on of those bobbble head dolls just bouncing and swaying and in the background all the serious questions that where being asked being played. Then comes the pause and then the question, do you reall want this man next in line to become president.

    Reply
  61. James L. McNulty, on October 14, 2012 at 9:31 pm said:

    To J.C. Nisbet: Bully for you! He is what life is all about. We are on the very edge of His return. He will set everything right and we’ll experience “joy unspeakable and full of glory.” If you wish to write me, I’ll show you the veritable mountain of SECULAR evidence that’s pointing to His absolutely imminent Return. His Return is our only hope. Not the Republicans, Not the Democrats, Both of those parties work for the same people bringing in the NWO at breakneck speed. The glorious promised return of Jesus Chriist is our only real hope.. And when He returns he will NOT be in a good mood and will remove everyone out of this world that offends Him. (Matt 13:41) And for that reason I maintain we won’t see the overwhelming majority of the Washington “gang of 545” ever again! Lord, please bless Bless J.C. Nisbet. James McNulty (jamesmcnulty87@yahoo.com)

    Reply
  62. ZACK, on October 31, 2012 at 10:05 pm said:

    YOU DIDN’T BUILD THAT

    Reply
  63. Molly, on October 31, 2012 at 10:15 pm said:

    Hoooly buckets, parties can be so aggressive towards each other! I’m young and I probably don’t know as much as a lot of the people here, but I do know that the opinions that I’m going to respect most are the ones presented in a civil manner! Tip for everyone from an undecided: you’re not going to convince me of anything if you have a petty, rude nickname for the other party. Also profanity is fine and all, it just looks pretty unprofessional.

    Reply
  64. Immigration Solicitor in Hackney, on November 1, 2012 at 3:12 pm said:

    It’s truly very difficult in this full of activity life to listen news on Television, so I only use web for that reason, and obtain the hottest news.

    Reply

Leave a reply to Mary Cancel reply