New Hampshire Union Leader Endorsement of Newt Gingrich: What Difference Will It Make?

Click here to read the actual endorsement

Bookmark and Share    The New Hampshire Union Leader is the Granite State’s largest newspaper and while it’s endorsements have not always been a make or break proposition for candidates running for President, it has almost always bucked popular thinking and strongly influenced the state of the presidential primary itself.   This time around, the Union Leader has again gone against the grain of popular opinion in New Hampshire and in a somewhat surprising turn of events, endorsed New Gingrich for President.

The endorsement comes at a very interesting time.  In the short history of the 2012 Republican presidential election cycle, a merry-go-round of flavors of the month have emerged with one candidate after the other suddenly rising to frontrunner status only to fall out of favor almost as quickly as they fell in to favor.  Based upon that trend, Newt’s time in the spotlight would seem to be coming to an end.  But with this endorsement from the Union Leader, Newt may get the type of help he needs to not peak too early in this race.

While the New Hampshire primary is still 6 weeks out, the Union Leader does not simply print an endorsement and leave it at that.  The paper’s publisher, Joe McQuaid once stated:

“The Union Leader’s style is we don’t just endorse once. We endorse every damn day. We started endorsing Reagan in 1975 and never stopped.”

In other words, from a point of journalistic integrity, whether it is moral or not, the Union Leader continues to make their case for their endorsed candidate.  That entails a process which often finds the Union Leader shaping the debate and interjecting certain issues in to the race.

But aside from the obvious help that this endorsement and the support that will continue to come because of it, Newt also benefits from the paper’s reputation for supporting the anti-establishment conservatives.

In 1972, the Union Leader endorsed Ohio Congressman John Ashbrook in the primary against incumbent President Richard Nixon.  That is an endorsement of particular interest to this author, who views Ashbrook as one of his personal conservative hero’s

In 1975, the Union Leader endorsed former California Governor Ronald Reagan over incumbent President Gerald Ford.

In 1988, the paper endorsed then former Delaware Governor Pete DuPont.  Back then, while I endorsed Jack Kemp, DuPont was my second choice.  In many ways he was an anti-establishmentarian and even had an idea about privatizing Social Security (I like people who are ahead of their time).

By the time 1992 rolled around, the Union Leader still found itself bucking the establishment and in both that year and in 1996, endorsed Pat Buchanan.  When 2000 rolled around, the paper backed the so-called “maverick”, John  McCain and they again endorsed him in 2008.  McCain lost the nomination in 2000 and the general election in’08, but he did win the New Hampshire primary both times.

So when  it comes to picking winners, the Union Leader has picked more losers than winners but in 2012, the paper’s almost TEA Party-like anti-establishment streak does nothing but help Newt Gingrich.  And not only in New Hampshire where Mitt Romney leads Gingrich by almost 25%.  The early endorsement by this major New Hampshire newspaper will have a spillover effect in states like Iowa and South Carolina where right now, momentum is the name of the game.  This endorsement will go a long way in helping to give Newt that momentum and  helps to reaffirm many of the positive aspects that Republican voters are looking for and even appeals to the TEA Party.

With quotes from the endorsement such as;We are in critical need of the innovative, forward-looking strategy and positive leadership that Gingrich has shown he is capable of providing.”  and “A lot of candidates say they’re going to improve Washington. Newt Gingrich has actually done that, and in this race he offers the best shot of doing it again”, Newt can make a strong case for why he is best suited to lead Republicans to victory in 2012, and the nation to prosperity in the years to follow.

Some of the most interesting things to come out of this endorsement came not from  what was written in it but what the editorial board members behind the endorsement said about the endorsement.

On CNN, Drew Cline, the paper’s editorial editor, contrasted Newt with his main rival in New Hampshire, Mitt Romney by calling Romney  “a very play-it-safe candidate”  and then going further by adding

“Imagine what that would look like as president,” “We need a candidate that is bold in his leadership, has a vision for where he wants to take the country, and knows how to get there.”

The Union Leader’s publisher, Joe McQuaide alluded to Romney in the actual endosement by writing;

” We would rather back someone with whom we may sometimes disagree than one who tells us what he thinks we want to hear.”

As stated at the beginning of this post, endorsements like that of the Union Leader don’t necessarily make or break a candidate, but if used properly, they can go a long way in helping a candidate and so far, Newt is using it properly.  In an initial response to the  support given to him from the Union Leader, the campaign called  the newspaper;

 “one of the country’s most important conservative barometer[s],”

And said it was;

“among the first to champion Ronald Reagan.” 

Such characterizations of the endorsement will have legs not just in the Granite State but in the Hawkeye and Palmetto State’s as well.

Bookmark and Share

Independence Day. It’s More Than Just a Day at the Beach


Bookmark and Share   On this day in 1776 was born a concept that blossomed into a government that founded the greatest nation in the world.  The concept of a government that believed freedom came first and that government’s main purpose was to defend our freedoms,  inspired a force that brought an end to tyranny and gave birth to a Republic that became a beacon of hope for the world.

The celebration of our nation’s birth is not partisan.  It is a celebration shared by us all.   Yet as we struggle with the responsibilities that come with freedom, there exists a partisan divide regarding how we proceed to keep our nation strong.  For me though, there is no question about the direction we must go in.  I believe that the very concepts and principles which gave birth to our nation, are the very principles and concepts that we must adhere to.   That direction is found within the conservative ideology.

As evidence, I would like to present the arguments once made by one of my political heroes,  a former member of the House of Representatives named John Ashbrook.

On the topic of overegulation, Ashbrook once wrote;

“This nation was founded on a number of principles. One of the main ones was the concept of limited government.

The virtues of limited government seem to have been forgotten by many political leaders. Government bureaucracy has grown. Regulations stifle more and more aspects of life. Regulation by government has taken on awesome dimensions. Proof of this can be seen in the regulatory agencies.

Federal agencies have steadily grown in number, in size, in complexity, and in the number of regulations issued. Just stop and think for a minute. There are so many agencies: EPA, FCC, FPC, FTC, ICC, EEOC, OSHA, CAB, CPSE, FAA, and the SEC. And this is only a partial list. I am sure that if you gave a few more seconds of thought, you could easily add another half dozen to the list.”

Ashbrook’s statement was not intended to commemorate our nation’s birth, but on its birthday, those words offer us a reminder of why we became a nation and what our government is supposed to be about.  The statement was made several decades ago, yet Ashbrook’s contention that the virtues of limited government  have been forgotten by many political leaders, still applies today.  Especially in the case of our President.

More government means less freedom.  Yet today, while we celebrate our independence, our political leaders are burdening us with more government and less freedom.  To debate the issue, the dynamic of left versus right, liberal versus conservative, Democrat versus Republican, is inevitable.  But if one were to base the argument on the principles that founded this nation, the debate is not as much left versus right as it is right versus wrong.  Many may disagree and at times such basic ideological differences can become heated and create greater divides than they should.  But on this day we can all unite in celebration of  the fact that thanks to the limited government principles that created us, we are free to disagree.  For that we thank God ……and America.

%d bloggers like this: