The debt. The deficit. The debt ceiling. Default. Social security checks. Medicare payments. Balanced Budgets. Tax increases. Gang of six. Cut, Cap and Balance. Headlines all in the past week. Headlines that, for the most part, the Republican candidates for President have been able to take a stand on without actually having to take a solid position. That is unless you are Ron Paul or Michele Bachmann, the 2 candidates who are sitting members of the House Of Representatives.
2012 GOP Presidential leader and former MA Governor Mitt Romney has stated that “The answer for the country is for the president to agree to cut federal spending, to cap federal spending and to put in place a balanced budget amendment.” “If the president were to do those things, this whole debt issue would disappear.” He has declined to say whether he would support a compromise.
Former MN Governor Tim Pawlenty said in Iowa this week, “Eventually you run out of money, but what you do is you buy yourself a bunch of time to have the debate about real reform.” A vague statement but one that allows him to offer an opinion without having to land solidly behind a plan.
Paul and Bachmann however are forced, through their House seats, to vote for or against the actual plans. They are not afforded the luxury to simply make broad statements without taking a position that the other candidates are. Both Paul and Bachmann were also among the nine House Republicans who voted Tuesday night against the ‘cut, cap and balance’ bill that would reduce 2012 spending by more than $100 billion, cap it over the next decade and prohibit more government borrowing until Congress passes a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget. Harry Reid has vowed it will not pass the Senate and the President has vowed to veto it if it does.
Ron Paul said it wouldn’t live up to it’s promises, passing the cuts off for years and Bachmann said it didn’t go far enough to cut spending.
So are candidates that hold seats in Congress at a disadvantage when it comes to being able to use the rhetoric on an issue? Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who was a top economic policy adviser to Republican Party presidential nominee John McCain in 2008 but not aligned with any of the contenders this time around stated, “What they would like to have is the issue and that’s the difference between them and the congressional leaders. They need an issue. The congressional leaders need a result.”
We will see in the coming days and months leading up to the Iowa caucus if the other candidates try to pull the votes of Paul and Bachmann into the fray. While the other candidates can rely on rhetoric and easily take the stance that the polls dictate are popular, sitting members of Congress have to take a solid stand on the bills before them. A disadvantage for sure in a large candidate field with a mere 2 current legislators in it’s ranks.
Filed under: Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul | Tagged: 2012 election sites, 2012 election strategy, 2012 Presidential Election, 2012 primary schedule, 2012 race for president, 2012 Republican caucuses, 2012 Republican Presidential Primaries, 2012 republican primary, about the republican presidential candidates, campaign 2012, campaign tactics, candidate bios, cap and balance, Congressman Ron Paul, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, cut, Debt, debt ceiling, debt ceiling talks, election 2012, G.O.P., GOP, Iowa Caucus, Iowa straw poll, Libertarian Party, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, Michele Bachmann, Michele Bachmann TEA Party, Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney for President, national debt, political strategy, race for the white house, Republican caucuses, Republican presidential candidate biographies, Republican primaries, republican race for the white house, republicans running for president in 2012, Ron Paul, Ron Paul 2012, ron Paul for President, Ron Paul Revolution, the 2012 presidential campaign, the 2012 presidential election, The presidential election, the republican race for President, Tim Pawlenty, White House 2012, White House 2012 on Twitter, Whitehouse, whitehouse2012, Who is running for President, Who will win the presidential election, wordpress political blogs | 1 Comment »